Huguenot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > So is HAL9000 suggesting that there should be no > regulation at all, that regulation should be > optional based on the driver's opinion of their > need, or just no regulation for him? ;-) Ah, you are in full swing Huguenot. I don't think HAL9000 is suggesting anything of the kind (and, to be frank, I do not believe you do either). As I understand the situation, (though the computer will probably come along soon and tell me I've completely miscontrued) he is merely expressing his concern over this apparent expansion of monitoring of driver behaviour when, as he points out, "we already have "more CCTV surveillance cameras per capita than any other country in the world". He is also (again, as I see it) by exclaiming "Isn't this going too far!", simply encouraging debate on the matter. So, never mind the winky-smiley-thingamigib at the end there, just put away that enormous wooden spoon of yours (yes I can see it). (Note: fisk free post - special effort, just for you Huguenot!)