Jump to content

Recommended Posts

TheArtfulDogger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ed_pete Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > TheArtfulDogger Wrote:

> >

> > > So yes bring it on as I would seriously love

> to

> > go

> > > swimming in a local lido

> >

> > How local d'you want ? Brockwell Lido is 2

> miles

> > from corner of Peckham Rye.

>

> Ed_pete, what a silly comment, as Peckham lido

> will be 2 minutes walk, thus reducing the need for

> me to pollute the atmosphere by driving or getting

> a bus to brockwell lido.



I guess my point is if you "seriously" want to swim in a Lido then 2 miles is hardly much distance-wise, even in London.

Besides, if you got a bike then it would only take 10 minutes and you'd not generate any fumes. It's funny how relative "local" is.

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I can't see this happening. Until a definite

> route is selected for the Bakerloo line extension

> is formailzed (right now Old Kent Roaad is

> preferred but not selected), nothing will happen

> there. I believe from threads on the tube line

> extension that it would run to that spot.


That bit of the park feels a bit odd - even

if no Lido it needs something there.

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I can't see this happening. Until a definite

> route is selected for the Bakerloo line extension

> is formailzed (right now Old Kent Roaad is

> preferred but not selected), nothing will happen

> there. I believe from threads on the tube line

> extension that it would run to that spot.


I believe the suggestion of extending the Bakerloo line to Elephant and Castle and then onto Hayes via a new station on Peckham Rye Common has fallen by the wayside, certainly the alternatives that were consulted on in 2014 were an extension to New Cross via either Camberwell and then on to Peckham, or via the Old Kent Road.


The odds on there ever being a tube station on Peckham Rye Common are very long and would meet with opposition (as well as support), even I would join a Save Peckham Woods campaign.


The odds on a new renovated Lido being built are much shorter and it's a wonderful idea. Here's hoping.

Not sure the site is big enough for the amphitheatre, Restaurant, gym, dance studio etc. from I remember, but it would be nice to have an open air pool.


Also, as someone mentioned, it's a bit too near to the busy junction.


Nunheadbelle



early_doors Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> A 50 meter heated Olympic standard poolOutdoor

> cinema with amphitheatre seatingRoof-top

> sunbathing areasRestaurantGymYoga/dance

> studioFunction room for hireWild-swimming ? phase

> two will bring a separate natural pool, tapping

> into the buried River Peck that flows beneath

Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> " The money would be used to develop plans and

> apply to Lambeth council for planning permission."

>


Well, who'd pay good money for a hole in the ground*?



*Disclaimer: This is not intended to annoy, alarm or distress anyone who is, was or has ever been annoyed, alarmed or distressed by those who claim to believe a decent religious/humanist burial is an assault on the planet in a way that comfortable homes and dropped-kerb driveways somehow aren't.

Love the idea, but that section of the park is now essentially a piece of grass between a junction.

Has a site survey been carried out? It's an open piece of land surrounded by busy roads ..... Really want this to work yet seems unrealistic?


(Which reminds me - whatever happened to the coal line project?)

I think it will work but wouldn't be too surprised if the original plans (re size/scope) have to change somewhat. Even if that were the case I think it would be a great addition and I'd support it in spirit and in cash.

As for the Coal Line, it managed to get its crowdsourcing funds and is, ahead, now full steam ahead: https://www.london.gov.uk/what-we-do/regeneration/funding-opportunities/crowdfunding-pilot-programme/peckham-coal-line-urban

I am loving all the nay and doom Sayers on this post.


The area where the old pool was is very large and I am sure that the plans have taken into account what is available for all of the facilities mentioned.


Yes it is a busy road, but let's look at where brockwell lido is, that's also on a busy road, with a busy junction nearby. I am sure the road and junction will be addressed in the plans once the project moves forward.


Rather than being negative about projects like this, people should be grateful that exciting projects are being planned for an area that has been so neglected for so many years.

Absolutely love the idea of another lido in the area!! I swim in Brockwell Lido every day, starting when the temperature reaches 12C which is usually sometime in April. Big difference will be that the Peckham lido would be heated and people can swim outdoors the whole year around. The outdoor swimming season at the Brockwell lido is for most people really short as not many people fancy swimming in water less than 19C (which still feels cold as an indoor pool is usually around 28C). I believe it would be very popular; outdoor swimming is absolutely wonderful!

Resurrect Peckham Lido! I swam in it regularly right up to the legendary storm of October 1987 - which caused surrounding trees to fall into the pool. It suffered irreparable damage and never re-opened.


You don't need parking. Everyone used to walk there anyway and there are still enough trees to form a protective leafy and woody barrier from the surrounding traffic which has not noticeably increased that much since then - unless I am completely mistaken.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
    • Very sorry to hear this, but surely the landlord is responsible for fixing the electrics?  Surely they must be insured for things like this? I hope you get it all sorted out quickly.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...