Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just to add my concerns regarding this, esp in light of the two other recent threads regarding street violence in the area. Glad you are being so rational/reasonable about it Blue10 and trust you are recovering from bri=uises and bruised pride. As the Police have said, such an occurance is rare in ED. Glad that the Forum is giving an opportunity for us to air concerns and share experiences. If it helps to engender that elusive community spirit.
I am really shocked to hear this - I used to run all around the bellenden streets at night and never, ever, felt threatened. There used to be (?) people around, walking about, and so I felt very comfortable. I am also surprised that no-one heard any 'rumpus' and came out. Please be assured, this is a real one-off and you were jolly unluckey. Surprisingly, i feel more uneasy pounding the steets in the deserted wasteland of 'the upper east side' where people really do seem to be locked behind closed doors (sorry chaps - you've heard this rant before). the other nasty side to this is, I am looking at every non-white bunch of girls for distinguishing marks - white puffa jacket and red bunches, which is horrible. I hate the idea that we can slide into 'daily mail' land and their generalisations, but I am checking out every gang of girls (not boys tho so there is hope) Hang on in there - it really is a very nice area

Blue10, I hope you are okay - you poor thing. Thanks for sharing the information. About what time did it happen? That could help jog people's minds if they were around at the time (coming home from the station perhaps) and saw the girls hanging around.


Also, if you can/don't mind saying, did they want to steal anything? I'm surprised no one came out - you're right, we must all look out for each other.

Jan T,

Enough with the self-flagellation. If the alleged perps were all men, white and over 6' wearing red jackets, you'd be checking out all white men of that description. If they were all female, Chinese and under 5' wearing trainers, you'd do likewise. It's not horrible, it's human nature so don't give yourself a hard time (unless, of course, you actually are racist.) Nero

Ko Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Blue10, I hope you are okay - you poor thing.

> Thanks for sharing the information. About what

> time did it happen? That could help jog people's

> minds if they were around at the time (coming home

> from the station perhaps) and saw the girls

> hanging around.

>

> Also, if you can/don't mind saying, did they want

> to steal anything? I'm surprised no one came out -

> you're right, we must all look out for each other.



Unfortunately, psychology research tells us that the prospects of people going to the aid of others in such situations is far from guaranteed. I recall a famous case in America many years ago when (the details are a little fuzzy) a woman was attacked and brutally murdered in the street at night and despite the prolonged attack being heard by a large number of people no-one intervened or even, until the last moments, even called the police. The case, particularly the lack of reaction, was so notorious that it attracted researchers to conduct a range of experiments into bystander apathy and the results were not at all encouraging.


If folk are interested I will try and dig out further references.

I can attest that the residents of teh Oglander are- in my experience - one of the only only roads I know here this kind of event would get people out of the doors and onto the streets


Og is a strange one in that at the top end / one way section, everyone knows each other...



C

The case was surrounding Kitty Genovene and yes, diffusion of responsibility is the term used to describe bystander behaviour.


They asked for a pound and then my bag but the focus was really on the violence, I managed to keep hold of everything some how.

The only real problem I've ever had round here is when a kid snatched my phone a couple of years ago. I ran after him and gave him a bit of a kicking, only for his mate to turn up and snatch it again! Was too exhausted to chase again. Loads of people saw it, but obviously nobody helped out...

I was screaming for help. People are frightened to intervene, i absolutely understand that however just a call to the police, a front door opening or a shout from a window would have diffused the situation. It's possible that nobody heard me but being such a quiet road I would think that was unlikely.


I think it's important to remember that if five people call the police they will not send five cars, they will send one. Never assume that someone else will make that call.

I was thinking about this last night on the way home in the dark. Do people have some sort of subconscious thought that if they get pounced on by a kid(s) in the street that they can't fight back, because their attacker(s) are in fact only children?

I asked Mr MW74 who said that regardless if the attacker was 15 or 50 he'd fight back if it meant he escaped; as much as possible, unharmed.

What does everyone else think on this?

And I agree, I can't stand people who see an incident happening and say "It's not my business" and just walk away. That makes my blood boil. I am always ringing the cops about something or other. Call me a curtain twitcher but if it means I help someone in distress who cares!

maybe true CWALD, but legally what's the position?


I'm not sure If I was to apprehend one of these girls (go with it, it's hypothetical after all) and bring them to the familial doorstep I would be greeted by an anxious parent all to pleased I informed them of their daughter's early forays into rapscallion-hood before it was all too late

I tend to see red and attack but it is not always the most sensible option. It has got me into trouble before. When the mist clears and you realise that you are lying on the floor and it is not in a cunning attempt to head-butt people?s shoes but rather a very unpleasant place to be.


Don't know what I would do if it were a group of young girls though. There would be 2 inbred instincts competing with each other.

I got attacked by 2 guys in Paris ages ago at about 4 in the morning and my first instinct was to fight. They didn't get my bag and I was a bit messed up afterwards, but at the time I just reacted instinctively.


I've been in a few potentially life threatening situations and my first instinct has always been to protect myself, my friends or family and fight.


I don't think the age of a group of attackers is really going to be foremost in your mind when attacked, and there is no way a court would hold you responsible for instinctively fighting back, unless you go beyond neccessary force and run after them to beat them up or something.

I'll do everything I can to avoid it, and walk away, but if some teenager decides to get violent with me, I'll smack him, and bo!!ocks to legal position.


Besides, a lot of the 15-16 year olds I see these days are taller than me, and twice as wide!

It would depend on the situation and whether or not I thought they were armed. Instinctively I would fight them off but bearing in mind their physicality (i.e. male; female; large; small) I would exert as much force as I thought was necessary to get away or, if only one person, apprehend.
I agree with CWALD. I would see red I think (hard to say sat at a desk safely indoors) and go hell for leather. Knowing my luck and the fecked up legal system in this country, I would be up on assault charges and the little sh*ts would probably be taking me to court. Defend yourself and you enter dangerous territory. It's almost as if you're meant to roll over and take it.
I honestly don't think you know how you would react when something like that actually happens. Sometimes fear can act like adrenalin and spur you into action, and sometimes it leaves you unable to move - you literally are 'frozen with fear'. I'd like to think that I would be brave and help someone else, but the mind and body don't always act in accordance with each other.
A good friend of mine is a cop and from what he has said to me you are a lot less likely to get done for defending yourself than we tend to think. You can also use a weapon as long as you weren?t carrying it with intent. So an umbrella, walking stick or set of keys are fine but you can?t carry a taser around.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...