Jump to content

Football Focus

jenniejenjen10

By jenniejenjen10
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Ladymuck

Ladymuck

Posted
Posted

SimonM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmmm....Manchester Utd can get to the final

> without meeting either Arsenal, Barcelona or

> Inter? Sir Alex must be laughing!


I don't see why he should be laughing (a little smile maybe;-))...Man. U are more than capable of giving those teams a run for their money (in my most biased opinion).

matthew123

matthew123

Posted
Posted
It's a bit of a shame really that Inter and Barcelona are in the same half of the draw, surely it is time for UEFA to mess about with the CL one more time and seed teams from QF to Final (e.g. such as in Tennis). It's almost like a dead rubber now having a French team in the semi final whilst the only real semi final of interest is likely to be Barca v Inter.
Annasfield

Annasfield

Posted
Posted

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Saturday

> Arsenal 2 West Ham 2

> Aston Villa 2 Wolves 0

> Everton 2 Bolton 1

> Portsmouth 3 Hull City 0

> Stoke City 0 Tottenham 0

> Sunderland 1 Birmingham 1

> Wigan Athletic 1 Burnley 2

>

> Sunday

> Blackburn 3 Chelsea 2

> Fulham 0 Man City 2

> Man Utd 4 Liverpool 1


This wouldn't surprise me. And judging from Fergie's comments about Rafa today he has clearly bumped his head.

ruffers

ruffers

Posted
Posted

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's a bit of a shame really that Inter and

> Barcelona are in the same half of the draw, surely

> it is time for UEFA to mess about with the CL one

> more time and seed teams from QF to Final (e.g.

> such as in Tennis). It's almost like a dead rubber

> now having a French team in the semi final whilst

> the only real semi final of interest is likely to

> be Barca v Inter.


Disagree, I'd like to see all seeding, avoidance of country clashes etc removed. The magic of the Cup and all that!

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Saturday

> > Arsenal 2 West Ham 2

> > Aston Villa 2 Wolves 0

> > Everton 2 Bolton 1

> > Portsmouth 3 Hull City 0

> > Stoke City 0 Tottenham 0

> > Sunderland 1 Birmingham 1

> > Wigan Athletic 1 Burnley 2

> >

> > Sunday

> > Blackburn 3 Chelsea 2

> > Fulham 0 Man City 2

> > Man Utd 4 Liverpool 1

>

> This wouldn't surprise me. And judging from

> Fergie's comments about Rafa today he has clearly

> bumped his head.



I'm not going to the game Anna (LUHG and all that) but have read stories that Utd and 'pool fans might have some sort of joint protest about their respective American 'owners', personally can't see it happening but any news about this from the other end of the East Lancs Road?

Annasfield

Annasfield

Posted
Posted

SOS have been in discussions with the FSF about joint protests with several clubs, but never with just United and Liverpool. One comment about Munich or Hillsborough and there would be carnage.


We did a joint protest with Pompey the other night though, but it seemed to be missed in the press.Some pics here

Annasfield

Annasfield

Posted
Posted

We tend to get shouted down by some of our fans when we protest as they seem to be blinkered to our financial problems. I imagine that when Torres is sold to fund our debt they may well open their eyes.


That said SOS has only been around for a couple of years, so to have as many members as we do, we are doing quite well.

matthew123

matthew123

Posted
Posted

The only way United and Liverpool fans will march shoulder to shoulder is if the country is invaded by alien forces ;-)


Agree about Ferguson throwing his toys out of the pram. Yes Gerrard should have got a ban but the Ref dealt with it on the pitch (if wrongly) which means the FA cannot then act. I doubt any of the hacks who cover the press conference would have the bottle to mention that but there we are.


As for the game, Liverpool have built up enough confidence this week to give United a very good game Sunday even if they did play last night so may be a little tired. My only real concern as is usual with a trip to OT is who is the Ref...

Ladygooner

Ladygooner

Posted
Posted

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I love you ladygooner.

> Even when you're prediciting west ham a decent

> beating you're nice enough to say we'll score

> twice. You MUST have a west ham soft spot in there

> somewhere :)


I have lots of soft spots Mr Mockney!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • march46
      Application for Londis Off-Licence next to Charter East Entrance

      By march46 · Posted

      Big Bellies didn’t have permission.  
    • CP_ED
      Application for Londis Off-Licence next to Charter East Entrance

      By CP_ED · Posted

      Link to petition if anyone would like to object: Londis Off-License Petition https://chng.it/9X4DwTDRdW
    • teddyboy23
      New Empanada Place on LL

      By teddyboy23 · Posted

      The lady is called Janet 
    • FellbriggSam
      Tree Killer – Seeking Advice on Dealing with Toxic Neighbours

      By FellbriggSam · Posted

      He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...