Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Marvellous times. I recall that. The woman's champion Barry Runner of 2012.



Siduhe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have a few photos and vids from 2012 - the year

> we were supposed to take my boss?s daughter to the

> Picture Gallery and instead she drank beer, took

> on three Marines and mostly beat

> them...USA...USA...

>

> https://melford.smugmug.com/Competitions/BarryBarr

> yRoadRace/

Only 7 for me in this incarnation. There was once a thread about me written when I was on a break. It's like reading what people really thought of you after you died. Someone thought it was RPC what killed me..........Quite a few of the posters on this thread have gone now, or merely resting.


http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,1477511,page=1

holloway Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Nine years for me! Not the most active poster but

> agree with all the comments, it's a cracking forum

> and long may it continue. Good job Admin for

> maintaining it.

> Where is '????' incidentally?


In the wedding excess thread earlier, defending the royal family.

Only because this is your thread and I just read the other thread. Nothing sinister and it wasn't true either. I found the speculation amusing. Please don't be offended. I've upset one person on Twitter this week-end who thought I was rude when I didn't mean to be. I don't want to make a habit of pissing people off.

OK. When I first read it, it did seem like trying to start something, so glad to hear that wasn't your intention!


When I started this thread I looked back at the last posts of my previous profile and was a bit horrified to remember how aggressive the lounge sometimes felt. I'd bow out rather than go through that again.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Only because this is your thread and I just read

> the other thread. Nothing sinister and it wasn't

> true either. I found the speculation amusing.

> Please don't be offended. I've upset one person on

> Twitter this week-end who thought I was rude when

> I didn't mean to be. I don't want to make a habit

> of pissing people off.


that's well below default twitter offending rate :) Gradually twitters getting worse reckon but we accept it as it's happening slowly.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...