Jump to content

Suggestions for this forum


Mark

Recommended Posts

In all fairness a decent GUI could be a nice way of accessing the forum especially from the fidliness of iPhone. Even on iPad that text box can be a bit of a pita on longer posts.

Not a bad idea Polly.


I might have a bit of crack though as a pc man I can only do a dodgy version, might need a mac man to let me take the source code over and integrate some proper iOS sdk elements in and get it legitimised.


Admin, does the forum software have an api at all?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
I'd love to be able to view "FS & Offered" where the threads are ordered by the date when they were started rather than when the latest message was posted. That's so that new items can easily be found. Or is this already possible and I miss something?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
If it shows up as an attachment, you have successfully uploaded it, and anyone who wants to see it can download it (as on eg this page). Do you really want to force it to be downloaded and visible to everyone who loads the page, irrespective of their interest, wish or bandwidth?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
  • Administrator

Hi


It is a good idea but unfortunately we do not have the facilities, time or a team who can implement such a system. There are other sites out there with such systems in place but they are sites set up as businesses with money behind them, this was set up by Mark as a hobby/fun thing to do. Maybe a business would like to assist the forum by investing in it and helping to introduce such a system, it has 34,000 registered users so it would certainly reach a good few customers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

gm99 thats a very good idea. I think the forum on the whole needs a formal feedback section. Even though the forum started out as a hobby for Mark, it was clear Mark was trying to turn this into a business, in the early days. However a free community forum who rely on donations and sponsors to cover the expenses, was never going to be a business.

Good luck in finding your investors Admin.

:)-D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 7 months later...

Dear Mark


I think the Forum is brilliant and very helpful in finding out things about East Dulwich that I didn't know about (even though I have lived here for 20 years !).


I recently noticed on one of the threads that someone had tried to download a photograph and was unable to do so. I recently had a similar problem and therefore was unable to re-home an armchair which ended up being taken away by the Council - sad. Many moons ago I was able to download a photo but the rules on this seem to have changed. I wondered whether it would help if you deleted some of the really really old stuff on the forum - is it getting clogged up? If that were to happen perhaps we might be able to download pics of any size? Just a thought.


Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Hi Administrator. Is there a way to delete one's own old posts so they don't become superfluous. Especially in the sell/wanted and family clasifieds there are a lot of these. E.g., things that have already been sold and collected or simply things that are no loger relevant. I am only talking about having 'control' over my own posts, not deleting other people's, of course. That would be plain rude and wrong. Thanks!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I believe around 57% of the 5,538 people who were part of the self selecting sample making up the original consultation, opposed the LTN. So just over 3,000 people. This was around 3 years ago now. I think there’s something like 40,000+ living across se22 and SE21 🤷‍♂️  The LTN is a minority interest at best. Whilst it’s an obsession for a small number on the transport thread who strongly oppose it, I suspect most locals quietly approve of the improvements made to that junction. …and we still haven’t heard who has supposedly been pressurising the emergency services and how? Or who genuinely believes that people are partially covering their plates and driving through the filters due to inadequate signage as ‘One’ are claiming? Again, it all sounds a little ridiculous / desperate. Feels like it may be time for them to start coming to terms with the changes.
    • Okay Earl, of those 'consulted' how many voices were in favour of the junction and how many against? Were there more responses in favour or more against? This local junction change is being driven by Southwark Labour Councillors- not as you assert by Central Govt. Also, if consultations are so irrelevant as indicators of meaningful local support in the way you seem to imply, why do organisations like Southwark Cyclists constantly ask their members to respond to all and any consultation on LTN's and CPZ's?  
    • You could apply the same argument to any kind of penalty as an effective deterrent.  Better than doing nothing. 
    • Check the link I provided above. It gives a very full account of where the push for LTNs came from, (in brief, central government). The consultation did not show that the majority of local residents were against the LTN. Not for the first time, you’ve confused a ‘consultation’ with a ‘referendum’. The outcome of local elections (which many opposed to LTNs excitedly promoted as a referendum on the scheme at the time…until they lost), suggests they are actually quite popular. All the polling on LTNs generally, also shows strong majority support across London.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...