Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It wasn't edge of the seat stuff, and it kept skipping back and forth from jungle warfare, to a state visit to the US some years later, where he made a speech at a conference of leaders. Not sure it flowed that well, but it had plenty of good points, not least the portrayal of the lead.


There are voice overs of Che being interviewed in English, and I think this was to keep you abreast of the story if you got lazy with the subtitles (or didn't speak the language obviously).


It would have been far too long to do as a single film, but I feel like I've stopped half way through, so will be able to give a more full opinion once I've watched part 2, which hopefully will be winging it's way from LOVEFILM shortly...

Keef,


I totally agree about the storyline jumping all over the shop concerning Che's routine of Guerrilla warfare and thrusting politics.


I did get a bit frustrated with it being in Spanish with subtitles but I think Steven Soderburgh made the right decision. The story is set in a Spanish speaking country affecting Spanish speaking people. It would be wrong and unconvincing for it to be otherwise.


However,


Lets not spoil the film for Mockney eh.

annaj Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Probably way too mainstream for this thread, but

> has anyone seen The Time Traveller's Wife yet?

> I loved the book and I'm torn between really

> wanting to see it and afraid that they will have

> ruined it.



They have ruined it- please save your cash! Remembering the last scene in the book, I was waiting for it and it didn't happen! (i mean when Claire is an old lady) Best film recently has been indie called 'Sleep Furiously' saw it twice-nice doc set in tiny Welsh village and daily life, it's got music from Aphex Twin too, just lovely...

I saw the Constant Gardner last night by Brazilian director Fernando Meirelles (of City of God fame) starring Ralph Fiennes and Rachel Weisz.


It dealt with a couple working together to uncover the wrongs being perpetrated against Africa by European and American corporations under the ever paranoid observation of the Foreign office's Africa desk who actively sought to destroy the couple outright, by whatever means possible.


I've never really been a great fan of Fiennes but he was an undeniably good compliment to Weisz's role. They were both very good.


The feature also served as a great big 'up yours' against the shady collaborations of big business and official agencies.


Bill Nighy's portrayal of a backstabbing diplomat was also a crucially breathtaking piece of acting further reinforcing the hope that I'll one day follow his example in how to grow old mischieviously. I also have no shame in admitting that I'll cry when he shuffles off his mortal coil.

Has anyone seen Sin Nombre yet?


I saw it yesterday and I really enjoyed it although it was pretty grim.


Few things bugged me though.


1. The overuse of the word 'homey' amongst the gang members

2. When they are sat on the roof of the train, I thought I saw Willy throw the digital camera onto the tracks. 10 mins later he's looking at it??

3. If it was just as quick to go by road (which it was as the old gang members kept catching up with the train), why didn't they just try and hitch or hide in a lorry or something, rather than sit on that roof for weeks?!


Maybe I've missed something.


Overall a very good film. Glad I had the subtitles though. I speak pretty good Spanish and found the girl easy enough to understand, but he was impossible.

Sorry guys,


I just thought that it came out a little bit too late after The Thick Of It. Don't get me wrong, there were some funny scenes (Steve Coogan was a welcome surprise) but I just found the storyline a little bit baffling since it was centred on the lead up to the invasion where as the original series (I genuinely loved that) was set after the whole mess had started.


I'm going to stick my neck out here and by all means savage me guys, but I wondered if perhaps having one or two members from the West Wing would've been fun in respect of the original series being a bit of a pisstake of government politicians and their policies. I just thought it would be fun for the U.S delegation to have included members of a cast that was doing the same thing as The Thick Of It.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have had multiple jobs completed at my home by T.D. PLUMBFIX SOLUTIONS LTD, and I wouldn't go to anyone else now. They always come at the agreed day/time, I have never been asked to rearrange. The jobs have always been completed to extremely high standards, and as a perfectionist myself, I appreciate this level of care and detail. I'm grateful of the clear up afterward too, leaving me very little to do after the job is done. I am always blown away by the speed and efficiency  - no waffle, no flannel, just sheer hard work from start to finish. In summary - a highly professional first class service. Don't hesitate to call T.D. PLUMBFIX SOLUTIONS LTD, if you like excellence and trade people that will respect your home. 
    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...