Jump to content

Recommended Posts

> A new community hospital is to be built on the

> site, together with other local health facilities.


Or so they have been saying for the last 15 years. They don't think they will need all of the land taken up by the existing hospital (plus large pile of rubble), and there has been a long-standing dispute about what to do with the rest of the land: key worker housing? a school? or luxury executive apartments?

"Or so they have been saying for the last 15 years. They don't think they will need all of the land taken up by the existing hospital (plus large pile of rubble), and there has been a long-standing dispute about what to do with the rest of the land: key worker housing? a school? or luxury executive apartments?"


I thought it was more like five years. Dulwich was part of Kings until five years ago, and in the run-up to the Jubilee Wing opening proposals for alternative use were being put forward.


Here's the architect's refurbishment feasibility report: http://www.dulwichcommunityhospital.nhs.uk/document_view.php?DID=00000000000000000193


And here is the business case from March 2007: http://www.southwarkpct.nhs.uk/document_view.php?PID=0000000745&DID=00000000000000001659


It's disappointing that there doesn't seem to have been any community consultation information issued recently and the last Dulwich Community Hospital Project Board and Community Involvement and Communications Group meeting scheduled to take place on Thursday 12 July 2007 doesn't appear to have been reconvened. If anyone is interested in finding out more, apparently they can contact Wendy Foreman, by email: [email protected] or phone: 020 7525 2245.

Frisco Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Or so they have been saying for the last 15

> years. "

>

> I thought it was more like five years.


I was maybe exaggerating a little, but it goes back to the 1990s I think. I went to an (angry) public meeting about it at Thomas More hall attended by Tessa J. and that must have been seven years ago.

I would question the whole premise of a hospital on the site.


It is possible to walk from East Dulwich Hospital to Kings in 20 m ins, drive there in 5 - 8 mins, travel by public transport in 20 - 30 mins. When I lived in Devon and N. Cornwall having a hospital within 90 drive time was considered pretty good going.


If the East Dulwich Hospital is to become a step down / rehab facility to enable bed blockers to be moved out of the main acute hospital - then I'm for it. If it is to be a minin acute hospital with full diagnostic facilities I would not. It makes more sense to concentrate high cost services (Imaging and path in particular) on one site in an area rather than many sites.

"I would question the whole premise of a hospital on the site."


While it may be possible walk to Kings from Dulwich Hospital, the types on facilities planned for the new community hospital are not those that would be provided at a general and teaching hospital like Kings.


It could very well contain facilities for recuperation and rehabilitation, with treatments like physiotherapy, which are now mostly provided by the PCT. As I understand it, there's no intention of duplicating the services at Kings, and certainly not acute services.

A year or so ago I read in the news that Ruth Kelly (or was it Tessa Jowell? - it might have been Jowell, and then Kelly when she got the job) said they would be building new high density housing on the Dulwich Hospital site - no debate. What happened to that ill-thought out plan? It baffles me how the hospital was half pulled down, instead of being refurbished, which it could so easily have been done. It was a solidly built, historic local landmark.

There's no truth whatsoever in the first assertion re high density housing.


As for why the old building could not be utilised for a modern community hospital - see Frisco's contribution above:


Frisco said:

Here's the architect's refurbishment feasibility report: http://www.dulwichcommunityhospital.nhs.uk/document_view.php?DID=00000000000000000193

"Architects NEVER recommend the reuse of a beautiful old building. What's the fun for them in that?"


I don't know if you've ever been a regular patient or user of Dulwich Hospital as I have, but, in my opinion, its external visual appeal (which I appreciate) is really its only saving grace.

  • 2 months later...
  • 1 month later...

LibraCarr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Has anyone noticed the increase in rats since they

> pulled the hospital down?



Yep. The demoliation of the hospital resulted in the release of an infestation of rats under the hospital, which were living under the East Dulwich Site.


They have spent a considerable amount trying to rid the problem, though how this affects the people around them, your guess is good as mine.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have a warning from EE that they're undertaking work locally to me, I'm assuming the south end of Underhill, over the next 5 days so there may be a temporary reduction in service. Otherwise it's fine. In case you suddenly hear adverse comments, problems may only be short lived. 
    • For those of us in Forest Hill this is great news.  As well as a better connection to Clapham, a quicker route to Catford is very welcome, as we often use Catford stations a lot for the Thameslink and to go down to Bromley and Beckenham. A stop in Brixton would be welcome.  Yes we have the P4.  But have you ever used the P4?
    • Sophie, I have to thank you for bringing me squarely into 2025.  I was aware of 4G/5G USB dongles for single computers, and of being able to use smartphones for tethering 4G/5G, but hadn't realised that the four mobile networks were now providing home hub/routers, effectively mimicking the cabled broadband suppliers.  I'd personally stick to calling the mobile networks 4G/5G rather than wifi, so as not to confuse them with the wifi that we use within home or from external wifi hotspots. 4G/5G is a whole diffferent, wide-area set of  networks, and uses its own distinct wavebands. So, when you're saying wi-fi, I assume you're actually referring to the wide-area networks, and that it's not a matter of just having poor connections within your home local area network, or a router which is deficient.   If any doubt, the best test will be with a computer connected directly to the router by cable; possibly  trying different locations as well. Which really leaves me with only one maybe useful thing to say.  :) The Which pages at https://www.which.co.uk/reviews/broadband/article/what-is-broadband/what-is-4g-broadband-aUWwk1O9J0cW look pretty useful and informative. They include local area quality of coverage maps for the four providers (including 5G user reports I think) , where they say (and I guess it too is pretty common knowledge): Our survey of the best and worst UK mobile networks found that the most common issues mobile customers have are constantly poor phone signal and continuous brief network dropouts – and in fact no network in our survey received a five star rating for network reliability. 
    • 5G has a shorter range and is worse at penetrating obstacles between you and the cell tower, try logging into the router and knocking it back to 4G (LTE) You also need to establish if the problem is WiFi or cellular. Change the WiFi from 5GHz to 2.4GHz and you will get better WiFi coverage within your house If your WiFi is fine and moving to 4G doesn't help then you might be in a dead spot. There's lots of fibre deployed in East Dulwich
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...