Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Steve, I'd not looked at this thread for ages, so missed your posts. I have signed the petition, and hope it works! I knew things were bad, but genuinely had no idea just how bad they'd become!


I am a regular of the CPT, and I worry for it's future. The "owner" or lease holder wants rid, because she's making nothing on it. People avoid it because they think it's scruffy, but she's not going to spend the money it needs to do it up, because she doesn't have it, and the pub is never going to make it. She wants rid, but can't flog it, and Punch Taverns still have it on their website for a hefty amount for the 10 year lease.


As things stand, the pub doesn't have much of a future, and this saddens me, as it has been the place I have met many of my best friends. I even met my wife through someone I knew in there, and I stayed in Australia with the parents of the current manager. It may sound corny, but it's more than just a boozer to me, it has an old school pub feel (not like the Castle in case you're reading DPF) that you don't get down Lordship Lane, and I fear that in a couple of years it will be a memory.


Anyway blah blah blah, didn't realise the problem was so wide spread. Hope something gets done, but unfortunately I'm not confident.

Come to The Ivy House 40, stuart Rd just accross the park. The Beer is reeasonably priced,

Tonight is the first night of "Pull the other one"

A chance to meet some local luanries!!


DOORS 7.30 SHOW 8.30. ?5 entry

With gifts from Martin Soan the master of prop comedy. The great Voltini sending several thousands volts through his Madame, Nick Revell satirical Raconteur saying " however rewarding it is making TV and radio programmes, there's nothing quite like a live gig. Hopefully that cuts both ways - for the audience as well as the performer."

This exploration of the Art of Comedy should be an unmissable evening for those with curiosity for what has gone before and what is likely to be in the ever growing business of Comedy.

The gloves are off?.

Interesting article in this morning?s Daily Mail, page 34/35

Paul Kingsnorth is probably the first journalist to speak out against the pubcos in his article - The murder of the English pub. Those who have walked before him have always moderated their arguments through fear of libel action from the pubcos. Bob Roberts wrote a similar article in Fridays Mirror but he skirted around the real issues. He quoted Mark Hastings from The BBPA. The BBPA have their routes deeply ingrained with the pubcos and are not representative of the ?real? pub industry.


Fine job Mr Kingsnorth, the first of many articles and editorials you will see this summer. As I said at the start of this post, the gloves are off?.

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Pubcos/

Great post Macroban, Share price across the whole pub sector have dropped on average by 50% in the last 12 months, due in the main to the smoking ban but also lack of confidence from the city bods. Wetherspoon?s turnover is down 14%, Laurel Pubs in administration, Massive Pubs in admin and Regent Inns just about to go that way as well. Obviously these companies aren?t pubcos (tied pubs) but it shows the lack of confidence from the financial powers. All that said, the pubcos are both powerful and arrogant and they will bounce back. The pubcos have 31,000 freehold properties across the UK so the City is not going to let the economy become unstable by allowing these property cartels to topple.

Punch Taverns' debt


The data are a little out of date, but I doubt things have improved since. Could be with commerical propety prices falling they now really have negative net assets. With turnover down and input costs up they could be having difficulty meeting interest payments and borrowing covenants.


Bounce back? Perhaps not this time.

With 10,000 pubs set to close this year, that?s up to 25% of the pubco estate, then please tell me why the CEO of the second biggest pubco has been aggressively buying up shares in his own company?


Now humour me for a moment, here?s a conspiracy theory for you;


The pubcos (FTSE100) are geared up so highly that they have backed themselves into a corner. With 10,000 pubs set to close this year, lots of them in affluent areas, what better way to realise the true worth than to sell them off as residential properties. In fact why not use your own valuers and transfer them to your own managed residential property arm? 12 months ago Enterprise Inns applied to the Government for a REIT status (Real Estate Investment Trust).


Of course the Government would need to be party to all of this so why not spread lots of propaganda about binge drinking (out of 57,00 pub licenses there are only 22 pubs with 24 hour licenses) Increase tax on alcohol, Introduce an illegal smoking ban and then when these boarded up pubs become an eyesore, relax local planning restrictions and turn them into residential.


Win, win, win for the pubcos!! But what about the 10,000 publicans who have been destroyed and lost everything?


Answers on the back of a postcard??

There seems to be a financial dividing line between Peckham Rye East and West. East Dulwich prices are pretty steep compared to Nunhead across the common. Ivy House: Stella, Kronenburg, Guinness ?2.85; Fosters, Carling ?2.65. Wetherspoons is cheaper, but I don't fancy downtown Peckham as a socialising area. Waverly Arms 5p a pint cheaper still, but you may feel out of place(very cliquish). Man of Kent 25p more. Incidentally, brewery increases plus the budget would require about 25p increase minimum to maintain gross profit margins.

Snorky wrote:I went o surrey Quays yesterday, to the cinema

Along the ( backstreets ) route , I passed 3 pubs shut down that were open maybe a month ago , when I last passed them.



Thats why they closed down then, because everyone else passed them by too.

Whilst you can buy beer cheap at supermarkets, include a dvd, and come out with money in your pocket, pubs will remain under threat.


Like the name 'Stereforth' it takes me right back to David Copperfield.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Oh yes, it could have been about there, I can't remember exactly. At one point there seemed to be a load of pizza places opening on NCR. I vaguely remember the one we used to use was put out of business by another one which opened. Wasn't Grace and Favour's food offering more of a tea shop at the back of the actual shop? If memory serves the owner, whose name escapes me now, was one of the earliest people I know to move to Hastings. Which must now be crammed with South East Londoners 🤣
    • That Neal Street veggie cafe was great. Food For Thought ❤️
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, You won't be aware that i proposed infill sites for housing in East Dulwich - the garages on Bassano Street and Henslowe that respectively became 1-4 Dill Terrace family houses and the 78, 80, 80A Henslowe Street family houses. These were council owned garages and it was frustrating how slow the council was to go from my idea to completion (roughly eight years). East Dulwich has some other vacant WW2 bomb sites I'm guessing that the private land owners have been sitting on.Owe for a land tax for vacant land.  WRT to the builders yard by East dulwich station. Southwark Council has an agreed policy the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum. But the approved scheme is 9 storeys of student accommodation. Very hard to put this genie back in the bottle. The council has recently publicly stated lower ratios of social housing will be required. I will be amazed if the developer doesn't submit another application now they have the 9 storeys approved but with significantly less social housing. The less social housing the higher the land values. The higher the land values the less social housing viability reports state are possible.  If we really want to increase home supply - Southwark have over 6,000 empty homes. Vancouver charges a low % of the value of empty homes and rapidly eased this problem. Parts of Wales have introduced under Article 4 planning permission is required for second homes seeing within 12 months a dramatic decrease in property prices. Southwark Council have Article 4 requirements - why not add this one? It takes National political will to solve this AND regional and local authorities such as the second home council tax premium and these being used promptly. 
    • https://www.letslinkuk.net/ I'm interested to know why the OP didn't find this sort of scheme to work, as I would have thought it was much harder to find someone to do a direct exchange with? Does anybody else have experience of a scheme like this? Happy to be persuaded! 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...