Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It was exciting to hear about the plans to redevelop Peckham Rye Station a while ago. However, now it seems like everything has gone quiet, and I can't find any information on what the latest news is. Does anyone have an update? Last I heard the council were talking to the 60 (can't believe there's that many!) businesses in front of the station to discuss renegotiating their leases and moving them elsewhere.


I just hope this project goes ahead, it would be a great shame if not.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/34541-peckham-rye-station/
Share on other sites

zeban Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What's wrong with the station as it is?



It smells bad, and there's always a lot of rubbish littering the street - food, clumps of hair from the hairdressers etc. Plus the station building is practically hidden from view by the ugly building built in front of it. Peckham Vision's plans to open up that square again sound great.

zeban


Have you seen threads on this subject in the past? The front and area of that station is/was pretty stunning


The dark alleys created by the shops out front are horrible and them being smelly isn't an opionion


The businesses themselves don't offer anything different to the 20 bazillion other shops along Rye Lane


I like Rye Lane and go there often, but to suggest there isn nothing wrong with the station and things couldn't be improved is a bit harsh

Also, I care a lot what the building I use / go by look like. The built environment has been shown to have an impact on people psychologically. There is a beautiful historic building hiding there and its great that the funds have been put together for its renovation. Peckham has some great architecture and it should be celebrated.
I don't think Rye Lane is ripe for gentrification any time soon. It's very hard to see it happening, and that's fine. But as SJ says, the area in front of the station is horrible. It would be great to see the building returned to its former glory, and the space around it opened up a bit.

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Also, I care a lot what the building I use / go by

> look like. The built environment has been shown

> to have an impact on people psychologically.

> There is a beautiful historic building hiding

> there and its great that the funds have been put

> together for its renovation. Peckham has some

> great architecture and it should be celebrated.


Exactly - I don't see how anyone could not want that to be honest!


So does anyone have an update on where this project is at ?

zeban Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In your opinion of course. Isn't the answer to

> littering to employ more rubbish collectors,

> wouldn't that be a simpler and cheaper solution? I

> agree the station is hidden but who cares. You go

> there once and then hey presto, you know where to

> go the second time!



I wouldn't say the statement that it smells unpleasant or that there's an unusually high amount of litter is an opinion. I'd say it's a fact!

I like a bit of 1930s - like many. If you ignore the tatty state of this building and redressed the Lloyds frontage, put back the windows that I assume were originally there, and removed the blue porch, it could easily fit along some Metroland station approach in north west London.


And maybe that's where it should be. Perhaps, and rather unfortunately, what we have is a decent enough (no more than that) building in the wrong place.


Does that make it worth saving versus the Peckham Vision plan for the Plaza/Gateway?


That really depends how far back we want to go to get to where we want to be (and also on where we want to be).


http://i39.tinypic.com/rixhxe.jpg



(PS This above is a comment about the buildings, not the livelihoods/businesses of those inside, btw. )

Well there's a 7 floor block of flats being built opposite Co-op house

Maple house (L&Q opposite Peckham Rye)


All these are shared ownership - but will attract the sort who wants gentrification

if just for a property profit.




Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't think Rye Lane is ripe for gentrification

> any time soon. It's very hard to see it happening,

> and that's fine. But as SJ says, the area in front

> of the station is horrible. It would be great to

> see the building returned to its former glory, and

> the space around it opened up a bit.

Not to me


But I can't appreciate anything 30s (nor could my mum - Spivs and Gangsters she used to say) .


edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't know what a "false arcade" is.

>

> Give me a clue?

>

> I am not suggesting, but stating, that the

> building in front of the station has an attractive

> inter-war retail facade.

>

> John K

I note the "bigger is better" suggested criterion for why the Brixton arcades have been listed and why Station Arcade has not been lisited.


Unless there is a simliar building elsewhere then Station Arcade is the sole survivor of its type.


The railway station received its listing on 31 January 2008.


"Squat" is an interesting verb to use.


I know that there is an argument for the destruction of our architectural heritage when it is inconvenient and in the way, even if it is a unique building.


John K

Isn't the building across the road of an identical nature?


I note you've yet to suggest an alternative to plans that have met, elsewhere, with near universal approval, JohnK. Perhaps you'd like to take this opportunity to do so?


In other news, a new cycle hub has appeared next door to the station in some of the refurbished area - something that will no doubt be welcomed by those who cycle from further afield to catch the train.

I suppose the argument here - regardless of whether some think the arcade has architectural merit - is that the station, as is, is completely blocked by it and therefore it's also impossible to appreciate what is a glorious building (and one that even the harshest critics must surely agree ranks above that of the shopping arcade). It's also about opening it up and making it less of a grim journey to get to. As anyone who commutes from Peckham Rye will testify, the walkways through the station - whilst not unsafe - are not the most pleasant way to get to the place.


The idea of creating more public spaces around the station is also something which, personally, I would welcome. As others have said elsewhere, and as the Peckham Vision crew seem to recognise, it would be nice if this could be done organically to ensure that the existing businesses have the opportunity of remaining there - rather than it becoming full of chain coffee shops etc.


Be good if they could think about creating some extra entrances to the stations - maybe via the piazza they are going to create at the back. This could go someway to alleviating the somewhat dangerous congestion on the stairs in the station - particularly on platform 4.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Honestly, the squirrels are not a problem now.  They only eat what has dropped.  The feeders I have are squirrel proof anyway from pre-cage times.  I have never seen rats in the garden, and even when I didn't have the cage.  I most certainly would have noticed them.  I do have a little family of mice which I have zero problem about.  If they stay outside, that's fine with me.  Plus, local cats keep that population down.  There are rats everywhere in London, there is plenty of food rubbish out in the street to keep them happy.  So, I guess you could fit extra bars to the cage if you wanted to, but then you run the risk of the birds not getting in.  They like to be able to fly in and out easily, which they do.   
    • Ahh, the old "it's only three days" chestnut.  I do hope you realise the big metal walls, stages, tents, toilets, lighting, sound equipment, refreshments, concessions etc don't just magically appear & disappear overnight? You know it all has to be transported in & erected, constructed? And that when stuff is constructed, like on a construction site, it's quite noisy & distracting? Banging, crashing, shouting, heavy plant moving around - beep beep beep reversing signals, engines revving - pneumatic tools? For 8 to 10 hours a day, every day? And that it tends to go on for two or three weeks before an event, and a week after when they take it all down again? I'm sure my boys' GCSE prep won't be affected by any of that, especially if we close the windows (before someone suggests that as a resolution). I'm sure it won't affect anyone at the Harris schools either, actually taking their exams with that background noise.
    • Thanks for the good discussion, this should be re-titled as a general thread about feeding the birds. @Penguin not really sure why you posted, most are aware that virtually all land in this country is managed, and has been for 100s of years, but there are many organisations, local and national government, that manage large areas of land that create appropriate habitats for British nature, including rewilding and reintroductions.  We can all do our bit even if this is not cutting your lawn, and certainly by not concreting over it.  (or plastic grass, urgh).   I have simply been stating that garden birds are semi domesticated, as perhaps the deer herds in Richmond Park, New Forest ponies, and even some foxes where we feed them.  Whoever it was who tried to get a cheap jibe in about Southwark and the Gala festival.  Why?  There is a whole thread on Gala for you to moan on.  Lots going on in Southwark https://www.southwark.gov.uk/culture-and-sport/parks-and-open-spaces/ecology-and-wildlife I've talked about green sqwaky things before, if it was legal I'd happily use an air riffle, and I don't eat meat.  And grey squirrels too where I am encourage to dispatch them. Once a small group of starlings also got into the garden I constructed my own cage using starling proof netting, it worked for a year although I had to make a gap for the great spotted woodpecker to get in.  The squirrels got at it in the summer but sqwaky things still haven't come back, starlings recently returned.  I have a large batch of rubbish suet pellets so will let them eat them before reordering and replacing the netting. Didn't find an appropriately sized cage, the gaps in the mesh have to be large enough for finches etc, and the commercial ones were £££ The issue with bird feeders isn't just dirty ones, and I try to keep mine clean, but that sick birds congregate in close proximity with healthy birds.  The cataclysmic obliteration of the greenfinch population was mainly due to dirty feeders and birds feeding close to each other.  
    • Another recommendation for Niko - fitted me in the next day, simple fix rather than trying to upsell and a nice guy as well. Will use again
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...