Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Never never never give these people money. If everyone sticks to this principle, they will have to move somewhere else.


I know this seems harsh, but I'd rather give to the charities that deal with homeless people who are better judged to help the right people that I am.

Wow this thread is so ED I'm almost ashamed! "Homeless people" is a tricky one - some good, some not so good, same as everyone else put in a v. strange & transient situation. Year after year I find myself giving out fewer and fewer quids and "Good luck mate" pats on the back but salve my conscience with chariddy donations to orgs I know are doing good work. Just cover yourself for both da street with a good local chariddy and a global one for when you turn the telly on.

I know this sounds mean, but it seems odd to me that they only seem to appear on Friday and Saturday nights when people are coming out of the ED pubs, and sit outside Budgens (or sometimes Somerfield) - where are they the rest of the time?


Afraid I tend to agree that it's better to give money to charities helping the homeless rather than to individuals - I've been stung too many times with bad luck stories that in retrospect were obviously false :-$

Better get used them .. in increasing numbers.


Along with Foxtons, fights and vom outside pubs on the weekend, loft conversions everywhere, Ocado deliveries and the +Venture bar, they are continuing evidence of SE22's inevitable decline into The New Clapham.

Ocado has been making huge losses for the last eight years and was just about to break even when the recession hit. This service may not survive.


Foxtons sales are running at under 50% of the 2008 business plan. This service may not survice.


I would not be buying shares in London Scaffolding, which had a near monoploy for East Dulwich loft conversions.

I've watched them - they pick their stuff up and go home about midnight :)


If a real recession hits I will have sympathy (as I do remember the early eighties)


Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I know this sounds mean, but it seems odd to me

> that they only seem to appear on Friday and

> Saturday nights when people are coming out of the

> ED pubs, and sit outside Budgens (or sometimes

> Somerfield) - where are they the rest of the

> time?

>

> Afraid I tend to agree that it's better to give

> money to charities helping the homeless rather

> than to individuals - I've been stung too many

> times with bad luck stories that in retrospect

> were obviously false :-$

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If I was homeless I'd probably want to spend all

> my money on drugs and booze too.


And this is a humanitarian and understanding point of view.


I always used to take the 'for the sake of feck, there go I' attitude and always donate a pound or whatever shrapnel I had to my name to any rough looking druggy/alchoholy looking gadgy who approached me, this was mainly around where I was kn ocking about, Brixton, Clapham etc. I still do occasionally but I now wonder whether I have the right to do it in other people's neighbourhoods as it certainly encourages people to come and beg and so attract the people who tend to prey on the homeless.

However donating food to a homeless person may salve a conscience inasmuch as you haven't contributed to his decline, physically, but as JL pointed out and I'd go along with, in a situation where a person is sleeping up an alleyway in a blanket of newspapers then a pound or two towards a little Special Brew oblivion/numbness could be the kindest contribution a fellow human being could make. Certainly on a short-term basis.

Ask anyone who works for a homeless charity (a chum works for Shelter) and they'll recommend you don't give the homeless people money directly. As many people have said, it's more likely to be spent on drugs or alcohol; while that may be the sort of distraction you endorse, the connection between homelessness and mental illness is strong, as is the connection between mental illness and long-term drug or alcohol abuse. Contributions to homeless charities instead will be spent on rehabilitation programmes, shelter, food and health programmes for the homeless.


Just my 2p worth. God bless ya, etc.


: P

Pierre Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ask anyone who works for a homeless charity (a

> chum works for Shelter) and they'll recommend you

> don't give the homeless people money directly. As

> many people have said, it's more likely to be

> spent on drugs or alcohol; while that may be the

> sort of distraction you endorse, the connection

> between homelessness and mental illness is strong,

> as is the connection between mental illness and

> long-term drug or alcohol abuse. Contributions to

> homeless charities instead will be spent on

> rehabilitation programmes, shelter, food and

> health programmes for the homeless.

>

> Just my 2p worth. God bless ya, etc.

>

> : P


Pierre


I don't disagree with you in the least. Of course donating money to a registered charity which will of course make a long term difference is the way to go in general. I know that people living on the street are there for many, various reasons, all of which you mentioned above.


But sometimes, just sometimes, when I can't or won't(which is all the time, if I'm truthfull) do anything for that individual a pound toward a can of something that blots out his reality - one which I can't possibly imagine or relate to -has at the very least helped for that short time.


I hope I make some sort of point, and my best wishes to your friend in Shelter.

When I lived in herne hill a character sat next to the cash point outside LLoyds bank.

I learned that he had his own flat and car and was 'known' to the police.

He had been sitting outside until about midnight every day for weeks and then he disappeared.

I was told he was arrested.

I never gave him anything as I was not a user of that bank, cashpoint, or beggar.

Beggars can't be choosers and if I was out on the street homeless and begging for money the little choice I'd probably able to give myself is...shall I spend this money I've begged on cheap skag or shall I seek oblivion in the old purple tin? Maybe I'm a soft touch but I usually try to give a little of what I can if I think they are genuine enough.


Oh! And SteveT I remember that bloke outside Lloyds in Herne Hill. Apparently he had quite a nice flat just up the road.

If I feel like giving them something I normally buy some extra food while I?m in the shop and offer them that. It is always appreciated. I?ve offered a tin of beer out of my shopping bags too on the odd occasion. This has also always been appreciated.


Although I definitely have noticed an increase in the last few years, corresponding with LL becoming a destination on Friday nights.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...