Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Never never never give these people money. If everyone sticks to this principle, they will have to move somewhere else.


I know this seems harsh, but I'd rather give to the charities that deal with homeless people who are better judged to help the right people that I am.

Wow this thread is so ED I'm almost ashamed! "Homeless people" is a tricky one - some good, some not so good, same as everyone else put in a v. strange & transient situation. Year after year I find myself giving out fewer and fewer quids and "Good luck mate" pats on the back but salve my conscience with chariddy donations to orgs I know are doing good work. Just cover yourself for both da street with a good local chariddy and a global one for when you turn the telly on.

I know this sounds mean, but it seems odd to me that they only seem to appear on Friday and Saturday nights when people are coming out of the ED pubs, and sit outside Budgens (or sometimes Somerfield) - where are they the rest of the time?


Afraid I tend to agree that it's better to give money to charities helping the homeless rather than to individuals - I've been stung too many times with bad luck stories that in retrospect were obviously false :-$

Better get used them .. in increasing numbers.


Along with Foxtons, fights and vom outside pubs on the weekend, loft conversions everywhere, Ocado deliveries and the +Venture bar, they are continuing evidence of SE22's inevitable decline into The New Clapham.

Ocado has been making huge losses for the last eight years and was just about to break even when the recession hit. This service may not survive.


Foxtons sales are running at under 50% of the 2008 business plan. This service may not survice.


I would not be buying shares in London Scaffolding, which had a near monoploy for East Dulwich loft conversions.

I've watched them - they pick their stuff up and go home about midnight :)


If a real recession hits I will have sympathy (as I do remember the early eighties)


Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I know this sounds mean, but it seems odd to me

> that they only seem to appear on Friday and

> Saturday nights when people are coming out of the

> ED pubs, and sit outside Budgens (or sometimes

> Somerfield) - where are they the rest of the

> time?

>

> Afraid I tend to agree that it's better to give

> money to charities helping the homeless rather

> than to individuals - I've been stung too many

> times with bad luck stories that in retrospect

> were obviously false :-$

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If I was homeless I'd probably want to spend all

> my money on drugs and booze too.


And this is a humanitarian and understanding point of view.


I always used to take the 'for the sake of feck, there go I' attitude and always donate a pound or whatever shrapnel I had to my name to any rough looking druggy/alchoholy looking gadgy who approached me, this was mainly around where I was kn ocking about, Brixton, Clapham etc. I still do occasionally but I now wonder whether I have the right to do it in other people's neighbourhoods as it certainly encourages people to come and beg and so attract the people who tend to prey on the homeless.

However donating food to a homeless person may salve a conscience inasmuch as you haven't contributed to his decline, physically, but as JL pointed out and I'd go along with, in a situation where a person is sleeping up an alleyway in a blanket of newspapers then a pound or two towards a little Special Brew oblivion/numbness could be the kindest contribution a fellow human being could make. Certainly on a short-term basis.

Ask anyone who works for a homeless charity (a chum works for Shelter) and they'll recommend you don't give the homeless people money directly. As many people have said, it's more likely to be spent on drugs or alcohol; while that may be the sort of distraction you endorse, the connection between homelessness and mental illness is strong, as is the connection between mental illness and long-term drug or alcohol abuse. Contributions to homeless charities instead will be spent on rehabilitation programmes, shelter, food and health programmes for the homeless.


Just my 2p worth. God bless ya, etc.


: P

Pierre Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ask anyone who works for a homeless charity (a

> chum works for Shelter) and they'll recommend you

> don't give the homeless people money directly. As

> many people have said, it's more likely to be

> spent on drugs or alcohol; while that may be the

> sort of distraction you endorse, the connection

> between homelessness and mental illness is strong,

> as is the connection between mental illness and

> long-term drug or alcohol abuse. Contributions to

> homeless charities instead will be spent on

> rehabilitation programmes, shelter, food and

> health programmes for the homeless.

>

> Just my 2p worth. God bless ya, etc.

>

> : P


Pierre


I don't disagree with you in the least. Of course donating money to a registered charity which will of course make a long term difference is the way to go in general. I know that people living on the street are there for many, various reasons, all of which you mentioned above.


But sometimes, just sometimes, when I can't or won't(which is all the time, if I'm truthfull) do anything for that individual a pound toward a can of something that blots out his reality - one which I can't possibly imagine or relate to -has at the very least helped for that short time.


I hope I make some sort of point, and my best wishes to your friend in Shelter.

When I lived in herne hill a character sat next to the cash point outside LLoyds bank.

I learned that he had his own flat and car and was 'known' to the police.

He had been sitting outside until about midnight every day for weeks and then he disappeared.

I was told he was arrested.

I never gave him anything as I was not a user of that bank, cashpoint, or beggar.

Beggars can't be choosers and if I was out on the street homeless and begging for money the little choice I'd probably able to give myself is...shall I spend this money I've begged on cheap skag or shall I seek oblivion in the old purple tin? Maybe I'm a soft touch but I usually try to give a little of what I can if I think they are genuine enough.


Oh! And SteveT I remember that bloke outside Lloyds in Herne Hill. Apparently he had quite a nice flat just up the road.

If I feel like giving them something I normally buy some extra food while I?m in the shop and offer them that. It is always appreciated. I?ve offered a tin of beer out of my shopping bags too on the odd occasion. This has also always been appreciated.


Although I definitely have noticed an increase in the last few years, corresponding with LL becoming a destination on Friday nights.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Had council stock not been sold off then it wouldn't have needed replacing. Whilst I agree that the prohibition on spending revenue from sales on new council housing was a contributory factor, where, in places where building land is scarce and expensive such as London, would these replacement homes have been built. Don't mention infill land! The whole right to buy issue made me so angry when it was introduced and I'm still fuming 40 odd years later. If I could see it was just creating problems for the future, how come Thatcher didn't. I suspect though she did, was more interested in buying votes, and just didn't care about a scarcity of housing impacting the next generations.
    • Actually I don't think so. What caused the problem was the ban on councils using the revenues from sales to build more houses. Had councils been able to reinvest in more housing then we would have had a boom in building. And councils would have been relieved, through the sales, of the cost of maintaining old housing stock. Thatcher believed that council tenants didn't vote Conservative, and home owners did. Which may have been, at the time a correct assumption. But it was the ban on councils building more from the sales revenues which was the real killer here. Not the sales themselves. 
    • I agree with Jenjenjen. Guarantees are provided for works and services actually carried out; they are not an insurance policy for leaks anywhere else on the roof. Assuming that the rendering at the chimney stopped the leak that you asked the roofer to repair, then the guarantee will cover that rendering work. Indeed, if at some time in the future it leaked again at that exact same spot but by another cause, that would not be covered. Failure of rendering around a chimney is pretty common so, if re-rendering did resolve that leak, there is no particular reason to link it to the holes in the felt elsewhere across the roof. 
    • Hey, I am on the first floor and I am directly impacted if roof leaks. We got a roofing company to do repair work which was supposed to be guaranteed. However, when it started leaking again, we were informed that the guarantee is just for a new roof and not repair work. Each time the company that did the repair work came out again over the next few years, we had to pay additional amounts. The roof continues to leak, so I have just organised another company to fix the roof instead, as the guarantee doesn't mean anything. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...