Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I reckon Lyndhurst Way. Never resurfaced properly, patched, cracked, pot-holed, speed humped all its length. Even the3 school marking paint is lumpy and bumpy and at least one tree low enough to catch your face. The crossing islands force bikes and motor vehicles together at frequent intervals. It seems unloved by the council yet it is an important thoroughfare for cyclists.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/39195-worst-local-road-for-cycling/
Share on other sites

Seconded on Lyndhurst way, have to ride down it most days. Always have to check my bike lock is securely in the bracket otherwise has been known to shake itself out riding over all those bumps. It would make me so happy if they resurfaced it. There are stretches of Southampton Way that are pretty bad too, but nothing compared to Lyndhurst Way.

Agreed. Lyndhurst Way is bloody awful, particularly heading back from central London. The markings outside Peckham Academy are like a Land Rover testing track. Blackfriars Road heading home near Laughing Gravy is bad too. But Lyndhurst takes the prize. Some roads in Barnsbury are its equal. But south of the river, that is the freakin daddy of

Perineum leathering, ball crunching, filling shattering road surfaces.

Normally I'd agree with Lyndhurst. It's my usual commute and it's terrible. I tend to be returning to ED at around 3pm, when the dodgy road surface is enhanced by dozy, oblivious teenagers wandering (or sometime cycling) down the wrong side of the road because they're too cool to walk on the pavement. Grrr.


But this morning I decided to vary my route and went up the Walworth Road. Bloody hell, Mic88, you're not wrong! That stretch up past the end of Burgess Park is shocking!

Camberwell New Road is terrible, both because it's a death trap of cycle lanes bleeding into bus lanes and the sides of lorries; cars turning into cycle lanes; and perpetual pot holes and raised iron work which is often deep enough to throw you off your bike. The new cycle superhighway work doesn't seem be entirely addressing much of the above either.
Some of you may have already done so, but it is really worth reporting each and every fault - to protect yourselves and other road users. You can do it online here:https://reportit.tfl.gov.uk/pub/servlet/ep.blank?srvCode=ABOUTREPORTIT&st=TOUCH&title=About+report+it&csrftoken=eg03M56EqnTIM%2B1cD0uhiY%2FBFOEbw3GxtWLa4Cpg%2F4RX51ha707YSjcUoeMuekAVVnqLghpps4QNgwF%2FoHKh6S4aeutqxYHEf5GGOpTbbsZZXQ1v7MxmYA%3D%3D
It's been done mostly all the way - there's still a stretch of old bumpy tarmac from the roundabout, past the park gates and a little beyond the zebra crossing but then it all evens out beautifully - although it now has a few speed bumps that I don't recall being there before.
Going into town you can now do College, Burbage then Milkwood Road to join up with the CS7 at Stockwell with barely a wrinkle in the road surface. The section from Loughborough Jct to Stockwell finally has cycle markings on it, its SO much better. I go that way rather than Lyndhurst/canal/Burgess park now.

Going eastwards along East Dulwich Grove (away from Lordship Lane) is pretty grim purely due to the lack of space and proximity to parked cars and the buses going up and down. I always feel harassed or hemmed in by drivers who feel they ought to be bombing along there but who are unable to do so as there is not quite enough space to get past a bicycle. I did see a consultation being circulated about this a while ago but I don't know if the proposed measures will go ahead.


I agree about the bottom of Denmark Hill, it's awful and that route made more inconvenient still now with cycle path being close on the Caldecot Rd cut-through. I'm also annoyed about the lack of cycling route provision at St Agnes Place, which is the short cut/safe route between Camberwell New Rd and Kennington Park Rd, avoiding the Oval junction.

Agree wholeheartedly about Lyndhurst Way.


There's a very nasty (at least 2 inch wide) long groove in the road - like a tram line - that runs from the bottom of Chadwick to at least Warwick Gardens that I have to consciously avoid so as not to come off my bike by getting the tyres wedged in it. It's in a really annoying position in the road too - about a metre apart from the parked cars. And avoiding it often puts me slap bang in the path of the bus or drivers which is never ideal. Lethal in the dark too.


I ride a sit up and beg bike and have actually had the mechanical fixtures that keep my basket attached to my head stem shaken off when cycling down that road.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have had multiple jobs completed at my home by T.D. PLUMBFIX SOLUTIONS LTD, and I wouldn't go to anyone else now. They always come at the agreed day/time, I have never been asked to rearrange. The jobs have always been completed to extremely high standards, and as a perfectionist myself, I appreciate this level of care and detail. I'm grateful of the clear up afterward too, leaving me very little to do after the job is done. I am always blown away by the speed and efficiency  - no waffle, no flannel, just sheer hard work from start to finish. In summary - a highly professional first class service. Don't hesitate to call T.D. PLUMBFIX SOLUTIONS LTD, if you like excellence and trade people that will respect your home. 
    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...