Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> People (and I'm really not looking at you moos)

> correcting other people's spelling or grammar. In

> an essay or work email, okay. On here or the like,

> no no no, please don't! It's smug at best, and

> frankly cruel IMO.


I couldn't agree more. One of the girls on another forum I post on is forever getting ribbed by some people about her spelling and grammar and it's totally unnecessary. Everyone knows what she means. It's not witty or clever it's just patronizing.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It must have been said already, but after this

> morning...

>

> Feckin kids playing mobile phone music on the

> bus!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :X



Too right. This just really annoys me. It ruins my journey and i get so angry. If the kid issmaller than me I'll say something like "why don't you have headphones?" or "why do you think the whole carriage wants to listen to your music". If i put on a stern enough face they normally turn it off or get out their headphones (!!).


If the kid is bigger than me (not hard at my amazing height of 5 ft 2) i'll normally move carriages but get really annoyed that I have to move because some little sh** thinks he has the right to sit there listening to his music really loudly and that everyone else on the carriage should hear it too.

indiepanda Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Keef Wrote:

> It's smug at best, and frankly cruel IMO.

>

> I couldn't agree more. ... It's not witty or clever it's just

> patronizing.


Absolutement!

Maybe someone should inform one or two Members of the self-appointed cognescenti on here.

If it keeps them happy who are we.with bigger fish to fry,to complain...:))

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Carnell's post made both me and lady mac laugh out

> loud on the 176. . . Which deserves a prize of its

> own



Made me laugh too, but in the interests of balance, Tony's reply made me snigger as well.

What I internally label Threads of doom, where all therein seem destined to repeat themselves to an uncomprehending world until the power runs out. There's a particularly apposite example rumbling on at the moment.


Bloody spot on! I am not above being drawn in to such threads, but you are so spot on!

missd Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Keef Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It must have been said already, but after this

> > morning...

> >

> > Feckin kids playing mobile phone music on the

> > bus!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :X

>

>

> Too right. This just really annoys me. It ruins my

> journey and i get so angry. If the kid issmaller

> than me I'll say something like "why don't you

> have headphones?" or "why do you think the whole

> carriage wants to listen to your music". If i put

> on a stern enough face they normally turn it off

> or get out their headphones (!!).

>

> If the kid is bigger than me (not hard at my

> amazing height of 5 ft 2) i'll normally move

> carriages but get really annoyed that I have to

> move because some little sh** thinks he has the

> right to sit there listening to his music really

> loudly and that everyone else on the carriage

> should hear it too.



This is one of my pet hates too but what really irritates is the few times I have turned and asked the (normally) lads to turn it down I've had other passengers look at me as if I'm barmy for saying anything and no one backing me up, even if I get an earful back - if someone else said something I'd hope I'd back them up... no wonder the kids keep doing it.

I normally ask the annoying little brats if they have headphones and politely ask if they would use them please because I'm trying to read my book, thanks. If they refuse then I'll ask them if the offending phone is insured. If it is, throw it out the window. If not, just give cuff fecker around the ear, and threaten to shove the phone up his arse. Usually works for me.

Now this is petty - schoolchildren (OK, one particular school boy)on the bus who stand in the bus exit area and don't get out of the way with sufficient alacrity when we reach the stop. Extra annoying points as there are seats available within three paces.


Get. Out. Of. The. Way. I have a split second of my life to save here.

SimonM Wrote:btw: Who was tied to a rock and tortured by a

vulture in Greek Mythology? Its for the ?125,000 Millionaire question and I

have no idea?..Any idea M8

> Nobody. It was an eagle not a vulture. Prometheus

> had his liver eaten whilst so tied, and then it

> conveniently regenerated overnight so the bastard

> bird could feast again and again.

>

> SimonM (arrogant, supercilious grammar

> school-educated pedant....>:D<)


It was an EAGLE?? No wonder I didn't get it!::o

p.s.Greek Mythology wasn't too high on the agenda at my Grammar School.:)

There's a difference between getting annoyed with lazy misuse of language and actually diving in to correct other people's posts. (S'allright Keef, I didn't think you were having a pop)


I don't generally go in for the latter, although I have occasionally made jokes when other people's slips of the keyboard make funny reading, and I think (or hope) that it will make the poster smile rather than feel got at. I don't think I'd mind if someone did that to me, although I guess it's all in the context.


Another petty annoyance - spitting in the street. When did that become OK?

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Another petty annoyance - spitting in the street.

> When did that become OK?


Spitting in the street is of course appalling, but the Teddy Boy nose clear, whereby said Ted blocks one nostril and discharges a stream of mucus into the gutter is a thing of matchless wonder and skill.

After a completely dire weekend at work, of the sort that makes even a natural optimist start to doubt human nature, I made the mistake of venturing outside today and went to the supermarket.

My petty annoyances are....


The man carrying a baby in a sling (so its face was right under his chin) and smoking...


The man in Sainsburys who took a flapjack out a box on the shelf and ate it without buying the box...


The man at the checkout who ate his way through an entire bag of kettle chips and drank half a bottle of juice from his trolley, whilst flicking through a magazine off the shelf, in the five minutes he was queueing. FFS it's five minutes. Can you not just wait? Are you really going to starve? Are you really that busy and important?


And finally, the woman on the really busy 185 carrying nothing more than a handbag, but with her papers spread out on the luggage shelf, you know, so it's easier to read, who completely ignored me and didn't move and inch when I got on with three enourmous (reusable, don't panic) shopping bags.


And SeanMacGabhann, if you so much as whisper that it serves me right for going to Sainsburys, I'll.... well I don't know what, but just don't.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
    • You don’t think there are right-wing politicians fanning this with rhetoric? Really? 
    • No party is willing to tackle the "elephant in the room" which is the national debt. It is costing the country circa £100 Billion ANNUALLY to service that debt. That is more than the defence and education budgets. That debt burden has to be reduced which in reality means cost cuts. That means cutting back state pensions, index-linked pensions for civil servants and others such as police, NHS etc. It means cutting back on universal credit and cutting the number of people who are claiming benefits.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...