Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Those daft bloody beards that all the young dudes are sporting these days. I like a beard or two but this massive rash of them all over Peckham and ED are really piddling me off. My other half caught a fella in the loos of the flying pig with a little "beard comb", grooming his mush. Shouldn't have eaten all those wings with that facial hair I reckon......

Another vote for the Angry Birds eyebrows look. Just weird.


Queuing all night for pop-ups.


Touch screen devices.


Shabby chic gone mental. Everything, everywhere looks the f-ing same.


That extreme piercing thing. You know the one. I don't even know what its called but it makes giant holes in your ears and I can't bear to look at them.


PS quids you forgot to add 'twitter' to your list ;)

numbers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

>

> That extreme piercing thing. You know the one. I

> don't even know what its called but it makes giant

> holes in your ears and I can't bear to look at

> them.

>

>


My daughter has those gross things in her ears and I can't bear to look at them either!

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> And the Reds go marching ON! ON! ON!

>

> I think you're missing a recent trend here. Hasn't

> quite grabbed you yet has it.




OOOOOOH right in the womb...


You cheeky git...the Lilywhites are hardly CL material and a mere one place above us RDs in the BPLT >:D<

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...