Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Matt


It's a perennial topic on here


A group of people normally meet up once a month and visit one of the curry house by rote


Details Here


Would you say there were many good curry house in Brick Lane? The ones on LL are pretty much "standard" with maybe Tandoori Nights as the more expensive but a bit different.


If you type "curry" into the search box atthe top right of the page you should find several threads where people discuss their favourites - no real consensus on the best tho

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Matt

>

> It's a perennial topic on here

>

> A group of people normally meet up once a month

> and visit one of the curry house by rote

>

> Details Here

>

> Would you say there were many good curry house in

> Brick Lane? The ones on LL are pretty much

> "standard" with maybe Tandoori Nights as the more

> expensive but a bit different.

>

> If you type "curry" into the search box atthe top

> right of the page you should find several threads

> where people discuss their favourites - no real

> consensus on the best tho


Thanks Sean,


Brick Lane had a few great places but a few terrible ones too! I was quite surprised by the number of curry restaurants when I moved here, but after trying two of them I was a little bit disillusioned.


The Coriander Leaf was good and I went there last night. I suppose I should be asking which ones to avoid!


Matt

snorky Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I dunno, but I would anvoid anywhere that

> advertises a non specific "meat " curry



Heh I'm used to this from Brick Lane! You can't be too sure the 'lamb' is really lamb either in some places. 28 weeks I believe is the cut off age but it's hard to tell once it's been prepared sometimes.

Snorks - isn't the non-specified "meat" usually mutton... I thought that was standard? Nothing wrong with a bit of mutton! But I guess in the worst-case scenario, it could be meat of a more sinister variety.


ms_1316 - I've had very few positive experiences of curry on Brick Lane. Could you recommend some of the good ones?


My favourites round here are Omrith, Tandoori Nights, and Pistachio Club (in that order). I haven't been to Ganapati, as it's always full and I'm never organised enough to book in advance.

I would give any curry house more than one go as it's possible for any restaurant to have a bad night. My 2 dependables are Omrith and Tandoori Nights so I echo Jeremy's endorsement (I haven't been to Pistachio for years for no reason I can think of)


Jaflong - the new boy on the block - did us proud when we visited but I've only been once


I expect some people could come on here and say they have had dreadful meals in all of the above - such are the differences in opinion and experience. I only actively dislike one place on the Lane but lots of people seem to like it

Jeremy,


Le Taj is far and away the best restaurant on Brick Lane - I've done them all and this one is consistently great.


Clicky - Don't let the website put you off ;)


Gerrard - no, I quite like goat. I had a roasted leg a few weeks ago from Peckham, very nice.

We actually started the Curry Club to answer this very question.


After visiting nearly all of them (Surma is next - before we start again). The overwhelming answer is:


"Depends what you like"


None of the local restaurants are bad.


Tandoori Nights, Omrith and now Jaflong have a modern take on the curry thing, Ganapati is a simple Indian cafe that produces lovely food. The rest are farely standard fare to a good standard.


Sadly, for me at least, the Mirash is starting to feel a little dated as all of the other restaurants have had a facelift in the last few years and the Mirash has been the same for about 20 years.

AcedOut Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There is now a Bombay Bicycle Club at the bottom

> end of LL (takeaway only). I've heard great

> things about these places. Has anyone given then a

> try?


Yeah -- and it's pretty good. Not special, but reliable. They tend to have your food ready for collection inside 10-15 minutes, even at peak, which can be useful if you live Ploughwardly. Deliveries inexplicably always seem to take an hour, and don't order via their website, which seems to default to a late delivery time.

Omrith is a clear winner for takeaway. I've been through them all over the past 5 years and have converted to these guys within the last few months. I've never actually eaten in though.


For eat-in, Tandoori Nights, although I'd like to see their hygiene rating improve.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Had council stock not been sold off then it wouldn't have needed replacing. Whilst I agree that the prohibition on spending revenue from sales on new council housing was a contributory factor, where, in places where building land is scarce and expensive such as London, would these replacement homes have been built. Don't mention infill land! The whole right to buy issue made me so angry when it was introduced and I'm still fuming 40 odd years later. If I could see it was just creating problems for the future, how come Thatcher didn't. I suspect though she did, was more interested in buying votes, and just didn't care about a scarcity of housing impacting the next generations.
    • Actually I don't think so. What caused the problem was the ban on councils using the revenues from sales to build more houses. Had councils been able to reinvest in more housing then we would have had a boom in building. And councils would have been relieved, through the sales, of the cost of maintaining old housing stock. Thatcher believed that council tenants didn't vote Conservative, and home owners did. Which may have been, at the time a correct assumption. But it was the ban on councils building more from the sales revenues which was the real killer here. Not the sales themselves. 
    • I agree with Jenjenjen. Guarantees are provided for works and services actually carried out; they are not an insurance policy for leaks anywhere else on the roof. Assuming that the rendering at the chimney stopped the leak that you asked the roofer to repair, then the guarantee will cover that rendering work. Indeed, if at some time in the future it leaked again at that exact same spot but by another cause, that would not be covered. Failure of rendering around a chimney is pretty common so, if re-rendering did resolve that leak, there is no particular reason to link it to the holes in the felt elsewhere across the roof. 
    • Hey, I am on the first floor and I am directly impacted if roof leaks. We got a roofing company to do repair work which was supposed to be guaranteed. However, when it started leaking again, we were informed that the guarantee is just for a new roof and not repair work. Each time the company that did the repair work came out again over the next few years, we had to pay additional amounts. The roof continues to leak, so I have just organised another company to fix the roof instead, as the guarantee doesn't mean anything. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...