Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've been in ED more than 10 years and while granted its changed beyond recognition, I don't think in 2005 it was Penge. Just being realistic. My husband has been here even longer (late 90s when the Palmerston was still a rough pub). It takes a good 15-20 years for an area to transform so don't move someplace expecting it to happen overnight.





legalbeagle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Penge = East Dulwich a decade ago. Get in while

> you can.

>

> Victorian housing stock, changing high street

> that's not too over gentrified, big parks.

>

> Penge West is on the London Overground making

> travel to East London or Docklands very simple

> (basically you are on the tube), plus the train

> goes into London Bridge. Penge East goes into

> Victoria and Blackfriars. Basically the travel

> from there is really easy.

>

> 176 bus to Lordship Lane if you miss it, no

> parking restrictions.

>

> For some reason Norwood has always had the

> potential to change but hasn't. Don't know why.

>

> (*disclaimer - I live in Penge so am biased. But

> Time Out this week agrees with me...)

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Palmerston a rough pub? Really? I think people

> use 'rough' when really they actualy mean

> ungentrified



Or perhaps they mean what they say. I've heard the same thing about the Palmerston and they certainly wouldn't have meant ungentrified.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Palmerston a rough pub? Really? I think people

> use 'rough' when really they actualy mean

> ungentrified



It was a very rough pub.


One night in 1990 myself a group of friends were in the 7-11 and the charming patrons started jeering us. Not to be intimidated we walked past them down lordship lane, not making eye contact but not taking any of their crap either.


Suddenly one of them got in their car, mounted the pavement outside what was the sports shop and knocked several of our group over to loud cheers from the pub. That soon stooped when he hit a woman who was just standing in shock and she rolled all the way up the bonnet then collapsed on the floor.


They all ran from outside of the pub and we just picked ourselves up helped the lady and waited for the police.


To this day I still see a few of the then patrons around ED.

My wife and I lived in ED for 5 years, and moved to Sydenham last year. We loved living in ED, but needed more space with a growing family.


We really like Sydenham, with the main benefits being:

- Better transport links: trains direct to Victoria and LB (both 17 mins) and CW (20-25mins). Also, the Bakerloo line is likely to service the area by 2030 (if you are thinking longer term). There is the 176 night bus too.

- Larger houses: ED houses are lovely, but even the 4 bed houses are small. Given the history of Sydenham, the Edwardian and Victorian houses are much larger, and also around 30-40% cheaper / sqft than ED.

- Parks: We love Dulwich Park and Peckham Rye, however Sydenham is blessed by Mayow Park, Alexander Rec, Crystal Palace Park, Wells Park; and not far from Sydenham Hill Wood and Dulwich Wood.

- Neighbours: Given the larger houses, the neighbours have been in the area for many years, and are all very friendly and helpful. In ED, we hardly knew our neighbours, and houses turned over much faster.


The downside is the high street still has a bit to go, including a lack of pubs and choice of nice restaurants (Crystal Palace is better). However, the Greyhound looks like it might open later this year, and Late Knights have a bar coming as well. The Dolphin has one of the best beer gardens in London, and Trattoria Raffaele is one of the best Italian restaurants I have been to. There is a new Sushi shop that has great reviews, and there is the famous Slatters Bakery (Cake Store), which makes the most amazing cakes and supplies all the scones to Wimbledon. Despite the recent stabbing in Sydenham, I have never felt unsafe and haven't seen any odd characters to date.


My view on Penge is also positive. I agree it has lovely housing stock; much like ED and the transport links are much better than ED. It is also close to Crystal Palace Park. The high street is improving, with some decent pubs as well. Definitely on the up!


Catford is getting better too, with a lot of investment in the centre. Also lovely houses and great transport links. If I had the money, I would buy a flat in the area as I think its still great value.


Forest Hill to me has better restaurants and nice houses, but is more expensive and spoiled by the South Circular. Its transport links are also very good.


Crystal Palace is nice; more expensive but has nice restaurants and decent housing stock.


We almost moved to Beckenham; and like its high street and houses. Good transport options as well.


That's my two cents for what its worth. As others have said, don't worry about living in an area that doesn't seem to be keeping up with its neighbours. The "London effect" means that price increases always pass onto neighbouring areas as they become better value. As money moves into the area, the high street will change. The key is finding the right house and enjoying where you live.


Over and out!

NewDad Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parks: We love Dulwich Park and Peckham Rye,

> however Sydenham is blessed by Mayow Park,

> Alexander Rec, Crystal Palace Park, Wells Park;

> and not far from Sydenham Hill Wood and Dulwich

> Wood.



Although to be fair, only 2 of those are in Sydenham ;-)

erm, and The Foresters and The Uplands??


None of these pubs were war-zones or anything but they had their moments...



Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Lord Palmerston was never rough in my opinion.

> I didn't particularly like it, but it wasn't what

> I'd call rough.

>

> Only pubs I remember having a bit of a bad rep

> back in the 90s were The Castle and The Mag.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> late 1990's Palmerston was no rough pub, in 1990

> there was aggro there tho if you wanted some.



Maybe early 90s. It was before my time but in my husband's time in ED as a student. You could definitely buy drugs in there. Definitely was rough. My husband is working class so when he says rough he doesn't just mean it wasn't a gsatropub.

@NewDad


At the risk of diverting this thread to be about the boundaries of East Dulwich, Peckham Rye Park is firmly within SE22. You might even squeeze in Brenchley Gardens if you were looking to stretch the definition of 'park' ..., and let's not forget SE22's very own golf course Aquarius!

Before about 1995, most Inner London pubs were rough, if by rough you mean that they were tatty and looked a bit shit and had a fair share of weirdos and potentially scary looking folk (if you're the nervous type) among the regular customers. Back then, a 'rough' pub was a place where you expected it to kick off with some regularity, rather than as a freak occurrence, or at least a place that was properly hostile to strangers.

what DaveR said.


LM - What's with the hint on working class having a more accurate definition of rough ?! When I lived on IOW we used to go to Cowes during Cowes week to scrap the yachties, they were pretty tough guys and very few working class amongst them (at least in the big posh marquee / club where we traded with them). They certainly hit hard and were no strangers to (wait for it) 'a good old fashioned punch-up'. So I don't buy that for a second, however romantic it may seem.

there was a decent thread (once :)) on scary pubs - i don't think i'd describe any ED pub as scary since I've been about this area mid-80s. A couple a bit lively maybe and a couple of villains ones. But far scarier in nearer areas Peckham/Camberwell


just ressurected it in the lounge :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...