Jump to content

Recommended Posts

On page 23 of Southwark PCT's consultation document - "Transforming Southwark's NHS" - it says "Life expectancy varies within Dulwich, with Nunhead having a lower than average life expectancy".


I'm surprised.


What causal factors are there among the Nunhead population to distinguish it from that of East Dulwich?

Or, could it be that Southwark Council knowingly let its cemeteries manager continue with a cosy little arrangement to dump toxic waste in the cemeteries which surround us, for pushing, what 15 years plus? Carcinogens, asbestos, and was that aromatic hydrocarbons?


Anyone for leukemia, a range of lovely cancers, MS, lupus, sjorgren's, RA etc, etc?

Knowingly. They were shown photographs of huge mounds of dumped waste and asked, both verbally and in writing, how exactly it came to be that the person driving the dumper had the key to the council's own lock to the site. They took no action. They refused to even listen to a highly regarded independent expert who offered to address them on how to properly manage their cemeteries. When local people organised their own meeting for that person to talk to the public, Connor, the cemeteries manager, and his boss, one Keith Weir, came to the meeting organised by the public, and Weir was witnessed threatening the independent expert with violence. The witness was a South London Press reporter, it was in the SLP at the time.


That was years ago.


Personally, I shall be refusing to pay the rise in council tax that they will want to dump on us too, to fund the clearance. These costs must be met by the councillors and officers who allowed it to continue.


We also need a full independent epidemiological study of the population who have used the cemeteries, as they were urged to by the Council, for "leisure".

Bigbadwolf wrote,

I agree. The fuller the ashtray the lower the income.

snip<


What a load of old bollox.

This lot have got or have had a few quid. If I die from a smoking related disease, atleast I would have paid for treatment from the gargantuan tax I have paid over the years, oh and I wont need my nappy changed when I'm 90.

http://www.jusonline.nl/smokers/

There are a lot of (or appear to be a lot of ) shelters for homeless people, and homes for disabled people, in Nunhead. Whilst not all disabled people are likely to die earlier than able-bodied, I know some disabilities carry with them a lower life expectancy. So given the above, statistically maybe it is going to be the case.


And I see more people smoking in Nunhead than in Lordship Lane!

A note from the owners of Ayres the Bakers.


I refute all suggestions of mass murder.

I know for a fact that neither I nor my ancestors have killed any of our customers by selling them fabulous buns and cakes because i have often asked them whether they are dead and they have catagorically said no.

Dulwichmum cannot know much about our shop as I do not believe she has ever paid less than ?5.00 for a loaf of bread so would have no idea what a proper bakers is.

For the sausage rolls I offer no defence.


So there!!


ps: DM I would have added a link to your UberBlog but dont know how.

Honk wrote:- I'd put it down to higher average wage in ED meaning more people able to afford a concubine to blow strawberry-scented oxygen into their ailing lungs if they so wanted, which pushes the life-expectancy right up.






Were I to beget a strawbery scented concubine I don't expect 'BLOWING' oxygen would be the first job I'd have in mind.

vinceayre Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A note from the owners of Ayres the Bakers.

>

> I refute all suggestions of mass murder.

> I know for a fact that neither I nor my ancestors

> have killed any of our customers by selling them

> fabulous buns and cakes because i have often asked

> them whether they are dead and they have

> catagorically said no.

> Dulwichmum cannot know much about our shop as I do

> not believe she has ever paid less than ?5.00 for

> a loaf of bread so would have no idea what a

> proper bakers is.

> For the sausage rolls I offer no defence.

>

> So there!!

>

> ps: DM I would have added a link to your UberBlog

> but dont know how.


Hee hee! A funny baker of fabulous confectionary ... have we found the perfect man?

Yes it all depends on what part of Dulwich you are in. For instance the life expectancy of someone in an Edwardian town house in the village is on average considerably more than that of someone on the track at East Dulwich Station. It is these sorts of social inequalities that we need to address.

It's brownish pink mush in the sausage rolls. If you buy them late in the day then the base will have hardened into what can only be described as scalding grease-filled cardboard.


The bread is a different matter though. It really is much better than anything in sainsburys or the East Dulwich baker. Sainsbury's bread tastes revolting and stale after you've tried the loaves from Ayres.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Link to petition if anyone would like to object: Londis Off-License Petition https://chng.it/9X4DwTDRdW
    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
    • I had some time with him recently at the local neighbourhood forum and actually was pretty impressed by him, I think he's come a long way.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...