Jump to content

Recommended Posts

LegalEagle-ish Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yeh i agree, the 'exotic' men bit was a bit wrong

> - I would have preferred a full description but I

> think that was the best the poster could think of

> to describe the guy as not a white guy I reckon,

> after everyone started screaming libel at her.

>

> Bit of a crap description - but the guy's

> behaviour is still wrong and women should be

> warned, in my opinion.



They didn't scream libel at me because I didn't start this post or encounter the guy with the STD. I said 'exotic' because of all them despite not being white still come from different countries so I can't say Iranian, Indian, etc because I am not sure exactly where they all come from but they are not English. And if I get taken to court and you all start screaming libel at me, bring it on! I have facts and lots of women who have endured it who can clarify it. At the end of the day I did not start this post , I was talking about my experiences in that there are a few businesses I do avoid because of being hassled, that is my way of dealing with it, I just don't go to the places where they are. Full stop.

Asset Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> well then you should know better than to

> stereotype or make insidious comments. Anyway who

> said mixed race/black/anything people have a right

> to make rascist comments?

> Cripes, so now there are several businesses on LL

> that want nothing more than to cheapen the women

> who patronise them. I may start shopping in

> Bromley.



Oh get over yourself!

frump Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "some of you lot are so anal it is unbelievable"

> nice choice of words for this particular thread.

> I'm sure the "lothario" is really getting hot

> under the collar now...stop encouraging him


Read the thread, the lothario is nothing to do with me.

It seems there may be a few Lotharios not all pox ridden, and not necessarily the same ones harrassing the various women who seem not to know each other - so it's all got a bit confusing now. Not sure if the poxy guy is actually a white guy, as he seems not to be part of the 'exotic' crew, so i'm off to have a cup of tea and hope someone can explain what actually happened!

heidihi,


Well done for standing up for yourself. I've no idea why certain people here are pretending this stuff doesn't happen.



HeidiHi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LegalEagle-ish Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Yeh i agree, the 'exotic' men bit was a bit

> wrong

> > - I would have preferred a full description but

> I

> > think that was the best the poster could think

> of

> > to describe the guy as not a white guy I

> reckon,

> > after everyone started screaming libel at her.

> >

> > Bit of a crap description - but the guy's

> > behaviour is still wrong and women should be

> > warned, in my opinion.

>

>

> They didn't scream libel at me because I didn't

> start this post or encounter the guy with the STD.

> I said 'exotic' because of all them despite not

> being white still come from different countries so

> I can't say Iranian, Indian, etc because I am not

> sure exactly where they all come from but they are

> not English. And if I get taken to court and you

> all start screaming libel at me, bring it on! I

> have facts and lots of women who have endured it

> who can clarify it. At the end of the day I did

> not start this post , I was talking about my

> experiences in that there are a few businesses I

> do avoid because of being hassled, that is my way

> of dealing with it, I just don't go to the places

> where they are. Full stop.

The police are just as unlikely to see this as a serious thing as most of the posters on here - even if it is all true.


In the criminal justice system a 'loose' woman has very little defence against any attack perpetrated on her if it is in connection with sex. If I'd had the same crap perpetrated on me and could prove he'd been giving the clap to other women on purpose, I'd drag the w@nker through the courts, just cos so few women would and I know what to expect from the defence lawyers.

I don't see how this thread differs greatly to the Con Woman thread. Both parties are obtaining items through deception. The con woman is obtaining money via deception. The Lordship Lane Lothario is obtaining trust (and sex) through deception. The reason I did not post his name and the name of his business was because I felt that might cause legal issues. I have posted NOTHING that clearly identifies who he is. My reason for starting this thread was that I wanted to get an idea of the full extent of this individual's gross actions. I assumed that anyone reading this thread who has been duped by him would IMMEDIATELY know precisely who I was referring to. Instead, I got a lot of PMs from women who've had negative experiences not only with the Lothario I posted about but also with a few other local married Lotharios who have behaved in a disturbingly similar way.

I was totally joking when I suggested it was ???? - I think it is obvious I was joking if you read what I wrote. ???? felt the need to send me angry, over the top private messages as a result!


HeidiHi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Well she was quite happy to suggest it was

> > possibly me earlier, scroll up.......so

> > discreation apart from people who aren't

> anything

> > to do her accusations...yup, that's integrity

>

> She just got excited because you was giving her a

> bit of a tough time hence she said it was you

> since you was giving her a hard time, I am sure

> in hindsight she realised she should not have

> jumped the gun. Gosh, I rarely post in the Lounge,

> I should be in the family room not in here!

That is nice, Quids can dish it out but cannot take it , why does that not surprise me? but then he was bloody rude to me even though I didn't make that comment.

Don't worry Sean, everyone knows it is not you, you are too lovely for that!

I am now considering approaching the police. No idea how seriously they will take it but the Lothario is still hassling me despite me repeatedly telling him never to contact me again. I think this thread may have angered him actually and that may be why he's suddenly hassling me again. Far from being out of order in starting this thread, I think I'm actually doing him a favour he doesn't deserve by not 'outing' his identity.

I agree that what you did was the right thing.


If the guy or guys in question do this on a regular basis then hopefully other women who have been victimised by this guy will come forward and prosecution will be easier. Also if they are prosecuted, they may end up on the sex offenders register so would be less difficult to prosecute in the future if they don't change their disgusting and illegal behaviour towards women.

FelicityNormal Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am now considering approaching the police. No

> idea how seriously they will take it but the

> Lothario is still hassling me despite me

> repeatedly telling him never to contact me again.


Felicity - why don't you request that the Administrator disables his username -- and then cross-references the IP address he uses, out of hours, from being able to access this Forum? I am assuming he is making contact via PMs - if it's also by mobile then add him to your mobile block list.

From what I have been told through PM the guys involved could all be guilty of sexual harrassment, false imprisonment, harrassment (stalking) and assault so I hope anyone who has encountered these guys gets in touch with both Felicity and Heidihi so that a proper prosecution can take place with evidence from as many of their victims as possible.


They both seem to be looking at taking the matter further and the evidence from any other victims would help with their prosecution and help to build up a pattern of behaviour.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
    • Very sorry to hear this, but surely the landlord is responsible for fixing the electrics?  Surely they must be insured for things like this? I hope you get it all sorted out quickly.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...