Jump to content

Recommended Posts

but more seriously..


first thing this morning they were reporting "back to normal service"


looks like subsequently there were a whole bunch of other operational problems which banjaxed the service


But my main point was an answer to "It is almost as if they try and be as unhelpful as possible."


As I use them a lot, I'm often left stranded or late by them as well but find that their twitter feed is pretty reliable and that they usually respond to any queries pretty fast


Doesn't make the service any better or get me to work/home on time - but they do try and be helpful

Yup. Latest update


"CLEARED: Trains are now running normally between London St Pancras International and London Blackfriars #FarringdonTrains"


But given recent events I wouldn't rely on the service is what i should have said last night.

It got worse again,


9.01 from Nunhead was delayed 15 minutes, then phone apps started saying it was cancelled but the poor chap in the office was still being told it was coming. He was finally updated about 5 minutes after it went through, without stopping, with very few people on it.


9.14 was then delayed but luckily it was pretty quiet and everyone got on as the 9.29 was cancelled.


The chap in the office was really doing his best to keep everyone informed, shame Thameslink weren't doing the same for him.

My husband's train was delayed and then cancelled last night. In the end he took the bus home.


I was late picking up the kids on Monday, on Tuesday I decided to go via LB only to have my train cancelled. I gave up - worked from home yesterday and today again. Am lucky that I have that option, but really need to go into the office next week. Seriously thinking about buying a bike as that seems to be the only option at the moment. (not so keen on the traffic though)

stawbs


problem the train cos have during disruptive periods is carriages and drivers get stranded as well. There aren't dozens of spare carriages knocking around at every end of line. So those missing carriages on your train are probably up around Luton somewhere until the train gets there and reattaches


Again, no use to us passengers affected - but it's logistics innit

Zebedee Tring Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Has the service deteriorated since GoMoreSlowly

> (or whatever they're called) took over the

> franchise? If so, can the deterioration be

> attributed to the company?



Yes definitely - GOvia have responded by setting up some 'meet the manager' sessions


St Albans side of the link complaining too.


http://www.hertsad.co.uk/news/transport_secretary_condemns_performance_of_thameslink_line_1_3925547

I missed the 42 by 10 seconds so I can vouch for them leaving!! Then stood in the pi$$ing hail waiting for a 63 (yes I know I am moaning), anyhow bus was rammed but kudos to the driver who took as many of us as possible and Then bus cleared not long after at a tube station (sorry no idea which one but only a few stops after Blackfriars) so if you can hold on for a few stops then you are away..

Thameslink are running a consultation into services from December 2015.


No plans to increase service levels on Sevenoaks (Denmark Hill - Peckham Rye - Nunhead) route despite adding more trains through central London and even a service along the route that doesn't stop.


http://www.thameslinkrailway.com/your-journey/timetables/december-timetable-consultation

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...