Jump to content

Recommended Posts

but more seriously..


first thing this morning they were reporting "back to normal service"


looks like subsequently there were a whole bunch of other operational problems which banjaxed the service


But my main point was an answer to "It is almost as if they try and be as unhelpful as possible."


As I use them a lot, I'm often left stranded or late by them as well but find that their twitter feed is pretty reliable and that they usually respond to any queries pretty fast


Doesn't make the service any better or get me to work/home on time - but they do try and be helpful

Yup. Latest update


"CLEARED: Trains are now running normally between London St Pancras International and London Blackfriars #FarringdonTrains"


But given recent events I wouldn't rely on the service is what i should have said last night.

It got worse again,


9.01 from Nunhead was delayed 15 minutes, then phone apps started saying it was cancelled but the poor chap in the office was still being told it was coming. He was finally updated about 5 minutes after it went through, without stopping, with very few people on it.


9.14 was then delayed but luckily it was pretty quiet and everyone got on as the 9.29 was cancelled.


The chap in the office was really doing his best to keep everyone informed, shame Thameslink weren't doing the same for him.

My husband's train was delayed and then cancelled last night. In the end he took the bus home.


I was late picking up the kids on Monday, on Tuesday I decided to go via LB only to have my train cancelled. I gave up - worked from home yesterday and today again. Am lucky that I have that option, but really need to go into the office next week. Seriously thinking about buying a bike as that seems to be the only option at the moment. (not so keen on the traffic though)

stawbs


problem the train cos have during disruptive periods is carriages and drivers get stranded as well. There aren't dozens of spare carriages knocking around at every end of line. So those missing carriages on your train are probably up around Luton somewhere until the train gets there and reattaches


Again, no use to us passengers affected - but it's logistics innit

Zebedee Tring Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Has the service deteriorated since GoMoreSlowly

> (or whatever they're called) took over the

> franchise? If so, can the deterioration be

> attributed to the company?



Yes definitely - GOvia have responded by setting up some 'meet the manager' sessions


St Albans side of the link complaining too.


http://www.hertsad.co.uk/news/transport_secretary_condemns_performance_of_thameslink_line_1_3925547

I missed the 42 by 10 seconds so I can vouch for them leaving!! Then stood in the pi$$ing hail waiting for a 63 (yes I know I am moaning), anyhow bus was rammed but kudos to the driver who took as many of us as possible and Then bus cleared not long after at a tube station (sorry no idea which one but only a few stops after Blackfriars) so if you can hold on for a few stops then you are away..

Thameslink are running a consultation into services from December 2015.


No plans to increase service levels on Sevenoaks (Denmark Hill - Peckham Rye - Nunhead) route despite adding more trains through central London and even a service along the route that doesn't stop.


http://www.thameslinkrailway.com/your-journey/timetables/december-timetable-consultation

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...