Jump to content

Recommended Posts

but more seriously..


first thing this morning they were reporting "back to normal service"


looks like subsequently there were a whole bunch of other operational problems which banjaxed the service


But my main point was an answer to "It is almost as if they try and be as unhelpful as possible."


As I use them a lot, I'm often left stranded or late by them as well but find that their twitter feed is pretty reliable and that they usually respond to any queries pretty fast


Doesn't make the service any better or get me to work/home on time - but they do try and be helpful

Yup. Latest update


"CLEARED: Trains are now running normally between London St Pancras International and London Blackfriars #FarringdonTrains"


But given recent events I wouldn't rely on the service is what i should have said last night.

It got worse again,


9.01 from Nunhead was delayed 15 minutes, then phone apps started saying it was cancelled but the poor chap in the office was still being told it was coming. He was finally updated about 5 minutes after it went through, without stopping, with very few people on it.


9.14 was then delayed but luckily it was pretty quiet and everyone got on as the 9.29 was cancelled.


The chap in the office was really doing his best to keep everyone informed, shame Thameslink weren't doing the same for him.

My husband's train was delayed and then cancelled last night. In the end he took the bus home.


I was late picking up the kids on Monday, on Tuesday I decided to go via LB only to have my train cancelled. I gave up - worked from home yesterday and today again. Am lucky that I have that option, but really need to go into the office next week. Seriously thinking about buying a bike as that seems to be the only option at the moment. (not so keen on the traffic though)

stawbs


problem the train cos have during disruptive periods is carriages and drivers get stranded as well. There aren't dozens of spare carriages knocking around at every end of line. So those missing carriages on your train are probably up around Luton somewhere until the train gets there and reattaches


Again, no use to us passengers affected - but it's logistics innit

Zebedee Tring Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Has the service deteriorated since GoMoreSlowly

> (or whatever they're called) took over the

> franchise? If so, can the deterioration be

> attributed to the company?



Yes definitely - GOvia have responded by setting up some 'meet the manager' sessions


St Albans side of the link complaining too.


http://www.hertsad.co.uk/news/transport_secretary_condemns_performance_of_thameslink_line_1_3925547

I missed the 42 by 10 seconds so I can vouch for them leaving!! Then stood in the pi$$ing hail waiting for a 63 (yes I know I am moaning), anyhow bus was rammed but kudos to the driver who took as many of us as possible and Then bus cleared not long after at a tube station (sorry no idea which one but only a few stops after Blackfriars) so if you can hold on for a few stops then you are away..

Thameslink are running a consultation into services from December 2015.


No plans to increase service levels on Sevenoaks (Denmark Hill - Peckham Rye - Nunhead) route despite adding more trains through central London and even a service along the route that doesn't stop.


http://www.thameslinkrailway.com/your-journey/timetables/december-timetable-consultation

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Just as one example, the grass in a least some of  the tree pits in Ulverscroft Road appears to have been sprayed. If it's not the council who has done it, then I wonder if someone is trying to kill the trees 😭 although I doubt if that would work, as the council have sprayed tree pits in the past (ignoring handwritten notices by my then very young grandchildren asking them not to spray as they had sowed flower seeds there) 🤬 Grass in the pavement nearby appears to have been neither sprayed nor scraped out. I'm quite confused.
    • They aren't. They are removing them manually, scraping and cutting them out. I've seen them doing it on my road and surrounding roads. I can't imagine that they would have different methods in different parts of East Dulwich.
    • I see. But as I read it, Tesco would still need the agreement of the owners/ leaseholder to submit proposals, so would need Poundland’s cooperation? I suppose we’ll have to wait while this plays out. There’s applications re this site on the Southwark planning portal dating back over 70 years. In 1954, Woolworth’s applied to convert the original 4 shops here (Nos 29-35) into one Woolies but the council refused because the flats above the shops would be lost and there was a local housing shortage following the war. Small businesses being displaced by big chains on Lordship Lane was already a trend back then.  
    • I see what you mean.  Perhaps the "alcohol licensing flyer for Tesco Express on the Poundland site" confirmed by the OP has been removed then.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...