Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> James didn't post anything particularly personal

> and certainly not offensive. People just quick to

> jump on anything.


It was personal information . James Barber did the right thing to delete it from his post .

robbin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Next to a butchers? I won't be going there!

> Imagine sitting outside on a nice warm day having

> a coffee with the stench of death wafting over

> you.


Oh come now, some of the people in the queue for Rose's are quite young.

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > James didn't post anything particularly

> personal

>

> You would post something like this about one of

> your clients?

>

> John Kennedy



Unless I missed something, I never saw anything that I thought was out of order or told me anything about these people that would help me to identify them.

I think JB wasn't wildly out of order but given who owns it is a matter of public record, some of the medical type information that was disclosed was not appropriate for a public forum. I would share that information with an individual casually but I was surprised to see it posted on the internet about someone.


Just sayin'....


Anyway, he thought about it and removed it, which is fine. We all misjudge things at times (I know I do!)

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Unless I missed something, I never saw anything

> that I thought was out of order or told me

> anything about these people that would help me to

> identify them.


I don't think the concern was about identifying someone per se. There was a disclosure relating to personal sensitive data as set out in the Data Protection Act 1998.

Maybe rather than focusing on the little old ladies house working out the when/how it will be made pretty we should be discussing the real eyesore of the old police station.


That ugly building has a far greater impact on Lordship Lane and I would say 124 even in its less than ideal state is more attractive :)

HI Robbin,

I didn't, I needed to tweak my post slightly and was short of time.


I've contacted, and they've agreed in principle, the person who owns this sites representative for volunteers to tidy up the front. But have yet to agree the details. One idea is to see it perhaps we could get the street artists project to help with this which could be amazing.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> One idea is to see it perhaps

> we could get the street artists project to help

> with this which could be amazing.


Nice idea, James. (inevitably some people would complain, but it has to be an improvement!)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi there,  Looking for 10-12 jars (to start with) of local honey to fill a small section of a deli space in my work canteen. Please get in touch if you know of any community projects/small scale productions Cheers
    • Yeah, it did work out in the end, but it was way more stressful and expensive than it needed to be. He lost money. He had higher offers early on, but those buyers pulled out because of all the delays. On top of that, he spent a fortune on legal fees trying to get the neighbour to sign off on the freehold transfer. It dragged on for ages. In the end, he was lucky the final buyer stuck with it, but the price was lower, and the whole thing left a bad taste. A lesson learned. Share of freehold can be a real nightmare if the other owners aren’t cooperative. You’ve got to be 100 per cent sure everyone’s reasonable, otherwise it’s just not worth the hassle.
    • It's quite a steep step from memory. The ramp would have to be quite a few feet long to make the angle shallow enough to be safe. Maybe I'm wrong - not an expert.
    • really, it's the fact that a chain is muscling in when there is already one in a small area - if it was just a chain coming to a new area, it's a little different  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...