The 124 Lordship Lane eyesore

[Broadbean]

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> James didn't post anything particularly personal

> and certainly not offensive. People just quick to

> jump on anything.

It was personal information . James Barber did the right thing to delete it from his post .

[bodsier]

The new london. coffee shops and trendy eateries...my guess it will be another food place,

http://www.madfeed.co/2015/londons-new-dining-scene-isnt-all-that/

[robbin]

Next to a butchers? I won't be going there! Imagine sitting outside on a nice warm day having a coffee with the stench of death wafting over you.

Mmmm lovely.

I suspect it won't be a coffee shop - or at least not for long.

[Jennys]

I just passed there and noticed what seems to be a clinical waste yellow wheelie bin outside. So presume there is an occupant living there.

[edhistory]

robbin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> but assuming

Unwise assumption.

John Kennedy

[edhistory]

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> James didn't post anything particularly personal

You would post something like this about one of your clients?

John Kennedy

[maxxi]

robbin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Next to a butchers? I won't be going there!

> Imagine sitting outside on a nice warm day having

> a coffee with the stench of death wafting over

> you.

Oh come now, some of the people in the queue for Rose's are quite young.

[Otta]

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > James didn't post anything particularly

> personal

>

> You would post something like this about one of

> your clients?

>

> John Kennedy

Unless I missed something, I never saw anything that I thought was out of order or told me anything about these people that would help me to identify them.

[LondonMix]

I think JB wasn't wildly out of order but given who owns it is a matter of public record, some of the medical type information that was disclosed was not appropriate for a public forum. I would share that information with an individual casually but I was surprised to see it posted on the internet about someone.

Just sayin'....

Anyway, he thought about it and removed it, which is fine. We all misjudge things at times (I know I do!)

[dc]

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Unless I missed something, I never saw anything

> that I thought was out of order or told me

> anything about these people that would help me to

> identify them.

I don't think the concern was about identifying someone per se. There was a disclosure relating to personal sensitive data as set out in the Data Protection Act 1998.

[uncleglen]

It might be a council owned property- Southwark are notoriously bad at maintaining the external integrity of their street properties

[bubblesanonymous]

Maybe rather than focusing on the little old ladies house working out the when/how it will be made pretty we should be discussing the real eyesore of the old police station.

That ugly building has a far greater impact on Lordship Lane and I would say 124 even in its less than ideal state is more attractive :)

[LondonMix]

That is being demolished and turned into a primary school-- its been heavily discussed on the forum...

[Bony Fido]

i wonder how long "ms blueberry" has lived in ED?

[James Barber]

HI Robbin,

I didn't, I needed to tweak my post slightly and was short of time.

I've contacted, and they've agreed in principle, the person who owns this sites representative for volunteers to tidy up the front. But have yet to agree the details. One idea is to see it perhaps we could get the street artists project to help with this which could be amazing.

[Jeremy]

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> One idea is to see it perhaps

> we could get the street artists project to help

> with this which could be amazing.

Nice idea, James. (inevitably some people would complain, but it has to be an improvement!)

[Earl Aelfheah]

Like the idea of the street artists project getting involved.

[LondonMix]

Its a good idea-- though I thought there was mention of the property potentially being sold this year. Is that still on the cards James?

[James Barber]

The owners representative seems much less clear on that now.

Lets get it tidied up and see where we are.

[Sue]

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

One idea is to see it perhaps

> we could get the street artists project to help

> with this which could be amazing.

Yes, great idea!!

[Ms Blueberry]

'ms blueberry' has lived here for years, but irrelevant.

[edhistory]

Posted by Ms Blueberry 17 May, 2013 07:18

Visiting Luca's was a factor in deciding to move to East Dulwich as the service and cinnamon buns were so good. That was back in 2008/9.

[Jeremy]

Shame on you Ms Blueberry. You're not allowed to have an opinion if you've only lived here 5 years.

[Earl Aelfheah]

Quite, anyone who has resided in ED for under 30 years is a blowin... Errr, I think....or is it 40?

[KidKruger]

Isn't this all really a reflection of how jealous parents are of seeing another adult crack open a can of chilled beer, when they're gagging for one themselves - but don't have the front to do it themselves ?