Jump to content

Which road to buy on (Court lane or Woodwarde? )


Recommended Posts

I believe all of Court Lane is in the ?Dulwich Estate? as is most of Woodward rd some of the top end away from the village near the plough is not.


Both roads are in the Southwark conservation area scheme.


BE WARNED!


If the house you buy is on the Dulwich Estate and you are thinking of extending you will need planning permission from the Estate as well as Southwark for even the most minor changes.


Many owners have gone through many years of planning grief expect to spend many thousands on architects and lawyers it?s a very costly minefield expect to get planning for nothing that way you won?t be disappointed. I have friends who went through hell for years spent thousands and got nowhere.



Woodward over Court Lane IMO unless you?ve got the money for one of the monster house near park the gates with off street parking for several cars.


edit


Estate houses are now 99% Freehold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Living on the Dulwich estates is a bonus, not a draw back. They have stopped so many of the fabulous, capacious homes on my road being divided into multiple dwellings. Mr Sentor (the estates architect) is very handsome and nothing but helpful (bats eyelashes). Court Lane is a rat run and Woodwarde by far the more sedate place to live, clearly. Alleyn Road is the best road in SE21 (sigh). Obviously it is out of reach for so many of you on here, but hey ho, it gives you something to aspire to (smirk). Anyone for G&T?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish I had a rich wife who could buy me a dwelling in SE21. Then I'd be happy to be a stay at home Dad and set up a website.


(Just a little joke that one - you can't expect to neglect the forum for that long and come back and tell us all how rich you are DM)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alleyn Road, being literally the wrong side of the tracks, is practically Norwood-borders is it not? B)


So much of Court Lane has no off-street parking and it is practically a main road. Some of the houses look quite....compact...The quieter streets running off it look far more charming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

annaj Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What a perfectly timed return Dulwichmum.

> Welcome back. Been anywhere nice?



She had a roofing job down in Sussex, few days away but cash in hand, can't be sniffed at...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I prefer Court Lane - most of the houses seem bigger and are varied in design. Yes, it is quite busy but is nearer to the park. I've heard that traffic control measures are shortly being undertaken in Court Lane so it may make the road less busy?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Emilia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>I've

> heard that traffic control measures are shortly

> being undertaken in Court Lane so it may make the

> road less busy?



Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh


There goes another couple of ?100k of the local budget, which could be spent, on refurbishment of something more important.



I doubt it will help make it less busy.



I have friends who live on court lane and the existing speed bumps have caused an increase in noise all day and all night vans lorries and cars thump and bang up and down them and rev their engines.


One reason why Woodward is the nicer road IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the houses on Woodwarde Road are nicer and the road much more pleasant than Court Lane (apart from the court Lane Garden-backing-onto-the-park ones). Would take issue with Dulwichmum about Alleyn Road; we looked and almost completed in one of the non-Victorian houses on Alleyn, but the thought of crossing the south circular proved too much - a lucky escape. We settled in the village instead, which is much more convenient for the local primaries and shops.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are considering a state school like the Dulwich Infants or Hamlet, bear in mind they measure the distance to your front door. So, see which is closer...No need if you are going private...


Woodwarde has a nicer feel to it otherwise...


Best, Otto

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear friends,


I do not live in nasty Norwood or vile Gipsy Hill - you will find that they are both Lambeth, and I could NEVER live in Lambeth (stamps foot). I shall have you know that an in and out drive is essential for me, and as I have young children, separate staff quarters on my enormous plot are a must.


I have not been active on the Forum as I have been sulking for weeks, since I was threatened by one of the Forumites. He emailed and said that he was going to do something medieval to me (gulp). As so many of you are clearly aware, I am a lady, and very easily intimidated (wipes tear from eye)...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A bit like this: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/apr/27/tory-staff-running-network-of-anti-ulez-facebook-groups-riddled-with-racism-and-abuse
    • Because the council responsible for it is far-left....   And you haven't answered whether it is worth diverting emergency vehicles because a few cars drive through the LTN and why some lobby groups have been so desperate to close it to emergency vehicles.    Emergency services hate non-permeable junctions as they lengthen response times....f you remember it's why the council had to redesign the DV junction because emergency services kept telling them they needed to be able to drive through it...but the council resisted and resisted until they finally relented because the emergency services said their LTN had increased response times....sorry if the truth gets in the way of a good story but those are facts. The council was putting lives at risk because they refused to open the junction to emergency services. Why? What could have been the motivation for that? So, in fact, it was the emergency services who forced the council (kicking and screaming) to remove the permanent barriers and allow emergency services access. So the council finally opened the junction to emergency services and is now coming back to re-close part of the junction.  Why?  Perhaps you should be asking who is lobbying the council to close the junction or parts of it or why the council is happy to waste so much of our money on it - who are they representing as even their own consultation demonstrated they did not have support from the local community for the measures? The results showed the majority of local residents were against the measure...but they are going ahead with them anyway.   In time, I am sure the truth will come to light and those rewponsbile will be held accountable but you have to admit there is something very unusual going on with that junction - its the very definition of a (very expensive) white elephant.    
    • A Roadblock that a civilised society wouldn’t allow. 
    • Now this is cycling  BBC News - Tweed Run London bike ride evokes spirit of yesteryear https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68900476  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...