Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Good call with Uncle Buck Jah. I bet you're a bit like him aren't you ya scallywag.


Right, apart from that.


As many of you will know I've banned for the past few days but today was the last straw!


Quids.


So you like American Pie do ya. What a fool you must feel now eh. That movie was the biggest load of shite I've ever seen! Apart from the quite frankly pathetic American humour I'd like to raise one crucial point. I know horny teenagers can get up to some 'hijinks' in order to get their rocks off but sticking it in an apple pie, on the work surface. I've got a very filthy mind but if I were to even contemplate giving one of my mums Rhubarb crumbles a good seeing too I'd at least have the decency to 'do the deed' behind closed doors!


BN5 and Keef, you two should be bloody ashamed of yourselves.


Right, my turn.


What is a "feel good" film. Something to make us feel fuzzy inside or something we simply enjoy watching even though we've seen it more than ourselves in the mirror.


For me it's got to be a Spy/Crime/War/Historical thriller.


The Ipcress file.

The Hallcroft Covenant.

Boys from Brazil.

Ice station Zebra.

Marathon Man. "Iz eet safe?"

Das Boot.

City of God.

9th Company.

Etc etc etc...

Serendipity. Not cusack's best ht a long shot but he just helps make films better. The fact that Kate beckinsale is in it makes an ostensibly naf film utterly watchable.


Rachel weisz has the same effect (jude law the opposite one making the enemy at the gates a confusing experience for me).


What's the Brendan burns in a time vault thanks to crazy walken dad, gets out meets Alicia silverstone? Feel good guilty pleasure anyway.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Serendipity. Not cusack's best ht a long shot but

> he just helps make films better. The fact that

> Kate beckinsale is in it makes an ostensibly naf

> film utterly watchable.

>

> Rachel weisz has the same effect (jude law the

> opposite one making the enemy at the gates a

> confusing experience for me).

>

> What's the Brendan burns in a time vault thanks to

> crazy walken dad, gets out meets Alicia

> silverstone? Feel good guilty pleasure anyway.



Got a bit confused there - think you mean Brendan Fraser don't you?? Think it was "Blast From The Past" - Brendan Burns would have made it a very different film!!


Think most of my favourites have been mentioned, for the Drew Barrymore fans can I recommend "Music and Lyrics" (bit of Hugh Grant thrown in for good measure!)

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You just love rubbing people up the wrong way

> don't you BBW. I just hope you're wearing surgical

> gloves.



Errrrmmmmm...


Excuse me but where on earth is there any evidence of rubbing anybody up the wrong way in the above post?

bigbadwolf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > You just love rubbing people up the wrong way

> > don't you BBW. I just hope you're wearing

> surgical

> > gloves.

>

>

> Errrrmmmmm...

>

> Excuse me but where on earth is there any evidence

> of rubbing anybody up the wrong way in the above

> post?



You just don't get it do you. Or rather I think you do.

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Midnight Run - When Charles Grodin gives Robert De

> Niro the money at the end, how could you not feel

> good?

>

> Passport To Pimlico - The very definition of

> 'pluck'.

>

> The Sound Of Music - The sound of eight year old

> Catholic boys falling in love with Julie Andrews.

> OK I own up, Catholic guilty.

>

> Oliver! - It's the songs. It's mainly the songs

> performed by Nancy - 'As long as 'e needs me, I

> know where I shall be...', 'There's a little ditty

> they're singing in the city, especially when

> they've been on the gin and the beer...'. ETC.

>

> It's A Mad Mad Mad Mad World - Epicly ludicrous,

> always a hoot.

>

> Dumbo - If for nothing else than the crows, 'I

> seen a needle wink its eye...but I think I'll done

> have seen everything when I see a elephant fly'

>

>

> What's Up Doc? - Streisand and O'Neil in a

> well-written farce. On top of their games. I mean

> whadda ya want?

>

> Duck Soup - 80 odd minutes of perfect comedy. Some

> of the odd minutes contain Magaret Dumont. Thanks

> Margaret.



Good call on Passport to Pimilco, watched it the other day, it is still plucky

What about 'feel better' films?


On The Buses - Makes me appreciate the fact that my family is nothing like Stan Butler's. Though I do covet the patent leather hair.


A Clockwork Orange - A near future dystopia where out of control teens embark on rampages of ultraviolence, robbery and the 'old in and out'. Viddy my lips, no thanks.


A Death In Venice - Liked the suits, but all a bit too consumptive and slightly 'noncey' for my taste.


Carry On England - A source of great comfort that I'll never watch it again.


Erazerhead - See Carry On England.


Purple Rain - Knowing that there is nothing I can ever do that will be as embarrassing as Prince's performance in this. A benchmark for toe-curling hand-wringing red facedness. Soundtrack rules however.

Moos,


I've already stated that I don't go in for the whole 'fuzzy tummy' flicks. I simply enjoyed watching it which in turn made me feel good.


I'm not trying to sound 'macho' but I simply enjoy watching movies that involve intrigue, suspense and tragedy. I don't go in for films where the plot involves self discovery or some kind of teenage road trip.


By all means call me narrow minded


I also love horror movies that disturb the viewer.

I see. But I still think you're talking about a different experience. I don't think a feelgood movie needs to be slushy. But it should leave you feeling uplifted and happy - enjoying feeling creeped out, or disturbed and thoughtful, or melancholy, or anything else, is not the same. I'm not valuing the one over the other, but I reckon you're just breaking the rules. To be macho. ;-)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Andy is an absolute star. Have used him for years and he’s become a hugely trusted and valued friend as well as handyman. Always willing to go the extra mile and doesn’t cut corners, but great on pricing. Can’t recommend enough.
    • Surely you are still covered under these circumstances even if you don't have the physical licence? I can't believe you would be prevented from driving? That would be a ridiculous system. I don't recall any delays   when mine was renewed. Why would their medical department be involved if you have no medical issues? Could someone have made some admin mistake somewhere along the line?
    • Does anyone have the same problem.  I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks  from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible.  Has anyone else experienced this. Read Medical not Medal.
    • You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east.  -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...