Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm finding a lot of the comments on this thread either wrong, or just silly


As a news aggregator I often read stories a day or two before publication in several papers thanks to twitter. In that sense it is no worse, and often more useful than what most people posting on here do online - which is neither here nor there apart from the fact that people seem to dismiss it or look down their nose at it


I have never sent a message about my breakfast or ablutions - clicheville. And look at the name it's got "twit" in it - hahahahahahaahahh. And it sounds like twat!! Hilarious


sheesh


I'm guessing most of the people condemning it have never used it in earnest


As for the form itself it probably is a stopgap for something else - entirely likely that in 24 months the name twitter will be history - but the concept will be integrated into something else


And any political party which ignores it as a communications tool ould be very foolish indeed

Fair point. Although you can't dispute the fact that SOME people use it (and other social network sites, forums, blogs, etc) in a pointless manner (again, my view only).


OK, maybe my view is not specific to twitter and I have the same view on those who feel compelled to post their exact movements on facebook.




SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm finding a lot of the comments on this thread

> either wrong, or just silly

>

> As a news aggregator I often read stories a day or

> two before publication in several papers thanks to

> twitter. In that sense it is no worse, and often

> more useful than what most people posting on here

> do online - which is neither here nor there apart

> from the fact that people seem to dismiss it or

> look down their nose at it

>

> I have never sent a message about my breakfast or

> ablutions - clicheville. And look at the name it's

> got "twit" in it - hahahahahahaahahh. And it

> sounds like @#$%&!! Hilarious

>

> sheesh

>

> I'm guessing most of the people condemning it have

> never used it in earnest

>

> As for the form itself it probably is a stopgap

> for something else - entirely likely that in 24

> months the name twitter will be history - but the

> concept will be integrated into something else

>

> And any political party which ignores it as a

> communications tool ould be very foolish indeed

Most of these things do have practical uses but would amount to nothing if it wasn't for peoples desperate insecurities driving them to prove their importance in an uncaring universe by collecting friends like so many pokemon and splashing themselves on every modern media possible; or a solopsistic need to persuade themselves of their own existence. I twit therefore I am.


He interjected on an interweb forum, listen to me, affirm me, I matter.....I.....will get my coat....

Most of these things do have practical uses but would amount to nothing if it wasn't for peoples desperate insecurities driving them to prove their importance



- would amount to nothing


+ would be much better


I use Twitter for work. I can monitor lots of people pointing out and linking to articles and items of common interest. Inevitably there is some flag-waving and self-promotion, but it's easily ignored.


I don't really understand the hostility to the actual service, although the hagiographic media articles about it are indeed annoying.

I use it to keep up with rumours about my team - as I am on O2 I can subscribe to tweets by text. As far as I am concerned it is absolutely pointless following more than about 50 people (depending upon how much they twitter as I could never keep up.


I do follow a few celebs but not many. I follow a couple of journalist from a IT magazine that I subscribe to and of course I follow the delightful Dulwichmum.


Only time will tell whether it will last.


Strangely none of my close friends are on twitter but they are on Facebook as I am.


I would agree with Sean - the majority of those who condemn it probably have never used it.


Actually I have heard that somewhere before.... oh yes, the Millennium Dome. Many of those who critised it never went. I thought it was great - I spend 8 hours there and still never got to see all of it.

Ok, Ok, I've never used it - but having an opinion about something I've not a clue about has never stopped me before. But conceptually it's up there with the updates on facebook, once you've too many friends (i've 7) it gets a bit of a pain...I should give it a go but spend enough time on here as it is

I been using twitter for few weeks was intially quite fun then it soon becomes quite boring. If you follow some of the celebs they use it just as an advertising platform. After you follow more and more people it gets to the point where you dont have time to read them anymore. recommend using tweetdeck application if your going to try it


IT solutions for everyone

www.linktechnicalservices.co.uk

I find Twitter great fun. It is a bit disappionting that people are so dismissive of it, I remember when I first heard of Facebook, it was a link someone posted on the forum, and I seem to remember that people couldn't see the point of it then.


Two days ago my favourite leather handbag was savaged by my darling cockapoo and I sulked and had a tantrum about it on Twitter. Mulberry have contacted me via Twitter and offered to repair it for me.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Amazing. Now could you cut and paste an AI summary of the defence case for Andrew M-W? 
    • I would like to understand this promise by the Greens in greater detail and how it applies locally? Presumably road/pavement upkeep and renewal is as important for cyclists and pedestrians as motorists? I am not aware of plans to build new roads locally but there has been plenty of money spent on converting roads into pedestrian only areas. On the face of it this feels a slightly empty statement, when applied at local level. I'd love to know the Greens stance in hiring out parks for private use (given impact on park environment), I'd also like to understand their stance on fireworks- I will look to see if I can find anything. I don't know if a manifesto exists under the documents section of Southwark Greens, but you can only access that bit by signing in- which is disappointing. If anyone has a manifesto that reflects local priorities- could they post a link?
    • You are most likely correct in thinking that  Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew it.  But they obviously thought that his skills, abilities and usefulness far outweighed the negatives. Here is a summary of the positives lifted from elsewhere:-   1. Strategic Architect: He was a primary architect of "New Labour," rebranding the party and shifting its core ideology to win the 1997 general election. 2 Master of Communication: Often called the original "spin doctor," he revolutionised how political parties manage the media. He famously created the "grid" system to coordinate government messaging. 3 Networking and Charm: Known as "Silvertongue," he possesses a peerless ability to charm and network with high-level global figures, including business leaders and heads of state. 4. Governance and Trade Expertise: Beyond strategy, he was considered a highly efficient minister, serving as European Commissioner for Trade and Secretary of State across multiple departments, including Business and Northern Ireland.  5. Reinvention: His capacity to adapt to changing political climates and rebuild relationships reflects personal resilience and strategic flexibility. With his skill and abilities, he delivered results for all his bosses. In the short time in Washington, he found a way to get on the right side of Trump - despite him  being critical of Trump in previous years. That said he is complex personality.  He can be simultaneously brilliant and arrogant, thick-skinned yet sensitive, and selfless for his party while appearing narcissistic in his personal dealings.  My OP asked if he would be accepted over the pond. It turned out he was because he got on famously with trump. He worked out the correct strategy to get on the good side of Trump and secured a better trade deal than the EU and other nations.    
    • Malumbu, do you happen to know what the current figure is for "trips into town made by walking, cycling and public transport"? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...