Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Well people embracing the ?12.00 burger.. and willing to pay ?80.00 per head for Pop-up fine dining..

... people will get what they ask for and very little else...


What next...


... ?20.00 for a Chicken Vindaloo ... ?8.00 for rice.. ?4.00 for a Poppadom ... ?9.00 for a bottle of Kingfisher..


Its coming.. believe me...


DulwichFox

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not all the curry houses (if any) rent their

> premises, many have been around since the time

> when ED high st commercial property was not

> exactly pricey.


That is not even remotely true... I don't want to give to much away but I know several that do pay rent.

What they have been paying and what they have been quoted for 2016...


.. and if Sea Cow were quoted ?50k for a restaurant that size then that is cheap.. about 15-20k cheaper than

even some of the smaller curry houses..


Foxy..

Well a new one previously Veer Zara is due to open in February if all goes to plan..


The new owners will be associates of an existing Lordship Lane outlet...


Supposedly serving Cocktails and a Bar-be-Que pit it will be a new twist on the usual curry house...


Watch this space...


Foxy..

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I know at least one that owns outright, which

> makes my point exactly true.

> So, worst case, we're not necessarily gonna lose

> the entire curry house community.

> Which is a good thing, right ?


Yes, but just because they own the property, it doesn't mean they're going to keep banging away as a curry house forever. There will be a certain price level at which they'll realise it's easier and more lucrative to rent it out to someone else or selling it to EvilPropertyCo of the British Virgin Islands.


Going back to Seacow: I don't want to be a critic unnecessarily but the place was usually empty whenever I saw it and the fish and chips was no better than any of the other chippies in the area IMVHO

The Lane was best in about 2009/10. Downhill since then imo. Still it has a long way to go before it hits the depths of the 90s so not too much to worry about at the moment.


Southwark council must be benefitting from increased taxation on business lets? (Presuming they get this money, so not all bad as the elderly and infirm may get a modicum of care?

Southwark council must be benefitting from increased taxation on business lets? Very unlikely - corporation tax is centrally collected - and if the beneficial owners are an overseas corporation they probably don't pay any tax anyway (!) Southwark will benefit directly from business rates next year, but these would only be paid by the property owner if the property is unlet, and are not directly linked to actual rents, but to a nominal land value.

The units are too small for traditional chains- the rents have little to do with there presence here. All that will happen us more upmarket indies will open. No indie store has been replaced by a chain.



Angelina Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> well the future is clear - increased rents

> (happens on one site - starts a chain reaction of

> basic economics - a bit like the 'estate agents

> effect') will lead to the chains being the only

> ones that can afford the location - and all the

> little local places up-shop-and-leave.

>

> It happens everywhere, sadly.

>

> Morrisons, M&S (Oh we have that), Starbucks......

> lovely.

Why 2009? I've lived here from before then and the stuff that has opened since 2010 is great / better. The cinema, Oddonos, Burro e Salvia, Cave de Bruno, the Flying Pig, the French House the Sushi place which replaced Adventure Bar, the Brickhouse (which isn't LL) to name a few.


People are overly negative about LL on this forum. Yes it's got lots of restaurants (covering French, Italian, Japanese, Thai, Indian, Turkish, Jamaican, Spanish and more), cafes and gastropubs, but it also has a kitchen and bathroom hardware supply store, flooring store, roofers / velux windows, joiners (on North cross), two DIY shops, two opticians, multiple pharmacies, kitchen utensil store, paint store (ed rd), bakers, deli, butcher, fishmonger, multiple supermarkets, corner stores, hair dressers, barbers, jewellers, beauty / nail places, vet, locksmith (Melbourne grove), wine bars, ice cream parlours, two bike shops, dry cleaners, laundrette, bars and craft beer shops, at least 5 clothing stores I can think of, picture framers, deli, two gyms, Pilates and yoga studios, squash and tennis courts a golf club, the sash window company, builders, baby Gymboree, shoe stores, kids stores,flower shops, plant shops etc etc etc.


You'll struggle to find an area with so much to offer outside central London. The rent hikes are a worry for the future but for the most part I love most of the places that have opened and I think retailing here is very rich, useful and diverse.


ratty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Lane was best in about 2009/10. Downhill since

> then imo. Still it has a long way to go before it

> hits the depths of the 90s so not too much to

> worry about at the moment.

>

> Southwark council must be benefitting from

> increased taxation on business lets? (Presuming

> they get this money, so not all bad as the elderly

> and infirm may get a modicum of care?

rabbitears Wrote:


> Going back to Seacow: I don't want to be a critic

> unnecessarily but the place was usually empty

> whenever I saw it and the fish and chips was no

> better than any of the other chippies in the area

> IMVHO


Thanks for this. The idea of pick-your-fish-and-we'll-fry-it is charming, but only when the exhaust fans work. Long ago, on my first and last visit, I struggled to breathe through a fog of aerosolised grease... and resolved to stay true to Olley's.

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The units are too small for traditional chains-

> the rents have little to do with there presence

> here. All that will happen us more upmarket

> indies will open. No indie store has been

> replaced by a chain.


I'm a bit more gloomy than you. Upper St and whatever the street that goes down the hill in Hampstead aren't characterised by bigger shops, but they've been heavily colonised by chain stores.

All of the larger units on LL are already chains. Chains are already interested but need a minimum footprint. The old ED Deli could and Foxtons could become chains but beyond that its unlikely. By chains I mean larger multinational chains, not chains like Honest Burger that have a handful of outlets in London. By that measure almost every store in ED is a chain already-- even the ones where its not so obvious like Le Chardon.

A post of mine from 2014.. this will have changed a little but not materially:


There are only 23 chains in the immediate ED area (ie from Sainsburys to the Townley Clinic and incl. Northcross Road and Melbourne Gv) not including banks or the post office or charity shops.


This out of a total of 216 units of all sizes in that same zone. Therefore the current rate of chains is 10.6%. If you get rid of the very large units, it's only 17 or 7.8%.

ratty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Lane was best in about 2009/10. Downhill since

> then imo. Still it has a long way to go before it

> hits the depths of the 90s so not too much to

> worry about at the moment.

>

> Southwark council must be benefitting from

> increased taxation on business lets? (Presuming

> they get this money, so not all bad as the elderly

> and infirm may get a modicum of care?



You live in Bromley now ratty


And moved out when ?

No, not your age, you were right the first time.


ratty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 2013 we moved out. Like I say the lane was best

> for me about 2009/10. After that it felt it began

> catering for a different type of person - or maybe

> I just got older.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thanks for all of the thoughts. I have a letter from searches which outlines the scope of work but doesn't mention any work guarantee as far as I can see. I agree that next step is to check directly with the major works team. Tim .
    • I thoroughly recommend Jay from JK Electrical Contractors who is an NICEIC registered. NICEIC is the UK's leading certification body for the electrical contracting industry and conducts regular audits and assessments on all its members. It is the specialist trade body which certifies professional electricians.  Jay completed the installation of a 19 way consumer unit for us and works to the highest standards and our entire electrical installation is now fully compliant with 18th Edition of the electrical wiring regulations. Before installing the new CU he traced and corrected faults that had developed over the last 25 years -some of which were my DIY bodges that were non-compliant.  We now have an installation that is 100% safe and  reliable . His contact details are :- 0208 150 6450 [email protected] Here is what he installed for us.
    • I fully support this petition, however it will need to be shared far & wide to be effective. Also there is always a huge amount of interest / objection during the festival, but not so much when they start consulting for the next one, usually around January. It's crucial that everyone that has been impacted makes their voice heard then.  A couple of points which may be good to include in the wording (if it is still possible to amend?) - The total tickets sold are way more than 3000. The licence allows a capacity of up to 9,999, but this may include staff & performers etc. The published attendance for 2024 was:  Friday – 8,999 / Saturday – 9,512 / Sunday – 9,422 So that's c.28,000 people trampling & littering our park over three days - people who have no need or desire to take any care or consideration of our park.  - Gala claim for 2024 that "62% of all ticket holders were from Southeast London and 18% of these were from hyper-local postcode areas SE15 and SE22." So a bit of maths shows that means that around 89% of attendees were not what most people would term 'local'... - Gala have ambitions / plans to extend the number of event days to 6, over two weekends. They applied for a licence for this in 2024, but then withdrew it. Instead they added a "free" event, billed as a community day, to the existing 3 day festival, thereby increasing the event days to 4.  This would appear to be an attempt to set a precedent for increasing the number of event days, and it's inevitable that they will attempt to secure the 6 days they desire for 2026, to increase their profits further. Two weekends in a row of noise, disturbance & disruption would be unacceptable, plus an extra c.18,000 trampling & littering the park... - The site size has been increased. The claim is that it is to compensate for lost storage space due to recent flood alleviation works, but the area has increased by more than the area lost, and appears to have been used for attendee activity rather than site storage. Gala have often stated that the festival can only be located in the park because the footprint has been designed specifically for that area, and yet this year the footprint had been amended & extended without any apparent issues. Surely this proves that it could be relocated?  Apologies, I just can't help going into rant mode on this issue, but hopefully some of the above may be helpful in increasing the argument presented by the petition?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...