Jump to content

Child abuse - Ireland's Catholic shame


Mick Mac

Recommended Posts

dulwichmum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mic Mac,

>

> How dare you refer to Monica's husband as "a right

> tosser." You have gone too far this time, I am

> reporting you to admin.


So now you are attacking my Husband, I have just spoken to admin. This has gone too far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Administrator Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Please refrain from making personal attacks on

> each other on the forum, they will not be

> tolerated.



If this is aimed at me, I don't think its justified. Monica has been taking a hammering on this thread for days with no intevention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree. With the title being what it is, it was bound to expand it's horizons beyond simply child abuse particularly in the context of the church's involvement in it. Mick's opening post made sure of that. Where it went after that was fairly predictable with both pro and anti church having their say.


How could this be kept 'on topic' when there was/is so much to write about it,without censorship of people's views? The only question is if anyone stepped beyond the boundary of what is acceptable to post on here. To my knowledge only one post has been removed because it was considered to be unacceptable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

giggirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Child abuse - Ireland's Catholic shame

>

> That is the title of this thread and I think

> people need reminding of that. If it can't stay

> on topic then admin should lock the thread.


seconded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Declan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I disagree. With the title being what it is, it

> was bound to expand it's horizons beyond simply

> child abuse particularly in the context of the

> church's involvement in it.



Good point Declan. I expected all people would of course be abhorred by the issue. Of course we all are. But I started the thread with great anger against the catholic church, a church that I had long ago left behind and one I really have a dislike for.


What I did not expect was that due to the route taken by the debate, I myself would end up trying to defend a pro catholic against a non catholic. And I found out a lot about people during the debate.


Its best for a thread to drift off topic from time to time. It allows people to express themselves and show their true colours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't think a thread could drift off-topic in the lounge!


Denial, Anger, Bargaining, Depression, Acceptance.


Where do you think the faithful are on this? Poor old Monica wnet through Denial swiftly, and her protest against DM is right hot in stage 2.


Anger, in its many guises, is designed to shut down the messenger. Doesn't change the message though. Head, pudding, snorting.


BTW, Declan's spot on, JL and GG you just don't like to see people upset - but that doesn't mean you can 'shut down the thread'. Little Jimmy's been eating worms, and it won't go away becuase we don't talk about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just want to say that this is not a theoretical topic for many who might be reading this thread. Many people have suffered abuse at the hands of the Cathoilc church and sensitivity to the pain they still feel at the horrors they or people they love, endured should be shown.


The full horror will probably never come to light as there were many people who seem to have acted like nazi collaborators, in that they did nothing or even joined in the abuse of people targetted.


I understand that people have faith in the Catholic church and that should be respected, but they also need to understand the damage caused to thousands of children by the institution they have faith in.


Don't let denial of what happened perpetuate the pain of the abused.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we all agree that Legal. Absolutely.

But just in case you think otherwise, I don't think there has been any denial, by anyone, on this trhead, of the events that were mentioned in the OP.

I'm just saying this to make sure that noone is unintentionally misrepresented. Not to start the thread rolling again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good thread this. Monica makes an important point, which i disagree with almost entirely. I don't think anyone owes anyone else's views "respect". In fact the demand by some for respect for their views has a chilling impact on free discourse ( i have no respect for people's religious views). That said, I think we do owe one another, even on a private forum such as this, a level of respect as individuals. It's important to play the ball, not the person.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Declan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> huncamunca Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Irish abortion bother 2.0

>

> Have you no comment to make as to why you put this

> article in this thread or were you just hoping to

> stir things up?



No, I have better things to do than stir it up!


But it is an interesting side issue to the influence of religious belief within the free state - not that this will be news to you I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
'Dulwich Mum' should be reported to 'Admin' if anyone should. What crass, revolting snobbery. Scarcely anyone can afford a house in Alleyn Park yet she thinks the presence of a state school - a highly regarded one at that - sends house prices tumbling.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Councillor Renata Hamvas is Chair of the Licensing Committee so she can't do anything because she agrees they can have a licence.  The noise possibly because of the wind went east and so those of us on the east side of the park were bombarded, it was dreadful.  At the meetings I attended - yes Gala boys in their smart suits including the boys in the PR company they'd hired - all said yes yes yes they'd restore it and it would be clean and essentially we had nothing to worry about. Just like they say every year.     The Friends of Peckham Rye Park (I am a member but not on the committee) do attend meetings but feel their hands are tied.  They are never told how much goes back to the park.  They would never see it anyway, but they should do.  They do so much for the park and the Community Garden area is the best most precious place to be for me, which they maintain and work hard at.    And Gala will not stop at asking for more days.  One of the six days they had wanted would have been for us locals - but personally why should I go for free to a festival which puts on music I can hear from my flat?  I don't want to give them any time of day or night.   And yes, suggestions that the festival be had on the common were knocked back even by Southwark Events Team (who are just as responsible for this, for letting them get away with this) ([email protected]) because Peckham Rye Common has no tree surrounding to buffer noise, and being smack in the middle of that triangle it would cause more harm because of the traffic.  I would beg everyone who is posting against Gala, please please get your complaints in now, and let's all physically go to the meetings next year.  The ones this year were quite well attended at the Clockhouse.   Sorry to go on but the sight of the site now is really upsetting and is exactly what Gala said would NOT be allowed to happen.
    • The fuel pipe for my minibus (parked just off Underhill Rd) got cut into and all the fuel drained two weeks ago. Took it to the garage to have the part replaced and hoped the thieves were chancers. This morning I've come to find the fuel pipe was cut into again and all fuel drained.  A bit at a loss now as there is no other vandalism or damage to my bus to suggest it is being targeted. All the neighbours cars down the road seem to be fine. Has anyone else in East Dulwich experienced fuel theft recently?  
    • So either house owners are fly tipping, or businesses are fly tipping.  No excuse for either.  I pay for my bulky waste to be disposed of by a licensed company.
    • It is something that has been raised in meetings with Gala organisers and it is claimed that the Common is not a large enough site. At least that was reported by someone who had attended one of the recent meetings with Gala, where issues were raised. If this rings a bell with any of our more informed posters, maybe they can remind us of the detail. I think the person either posted on this forum or it was raised in a recorded meeting with Gala, that I listened to. Sorry, cannot recall exactly. A further reason given, historically, is that there are not enough trees to act as sound buffers on the Common- I can imagine that is true. Have Friends of Peckham Rye commented yet? What about Cllr Renata Hamvas?      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...