Jump to content

The Lounge

The place to relax and chat about anything.

22,629 topics in this forum

  1. Wood burners

    • 16 replies
    • 2.5k views
  2. Greasy spoons

    • 8 replies
    • 829 views
    • 7 replies
    • 1.6k views
  3. Dean and Nigel blend in

    • 1 reply
    • 582 views
    • 26 replies
    • 972 views
    • 22 replies
    • 902 views
    • 166 replies
    • 8k views
    • 11 replies
    • 1.7k views
  4. Fireworks

    • 15 replies
    • 865 views
  5. Track suit victims 1 2

    • 27 replies
    • 1.5k views
  6. A fair society ... 1 2 3 4 11

    • 264 replies
    • 7.7k views
    • 4 replies
    • 794 views
  7. Andy McNab

    • 2 replies
    • 625 views
    • 29 replies
    • 1.1k views
    • 2 replies
    • 1.1k views
  8. observer food monthly...

    • 0 replies
    • 788 views
    • 2 replies
    • 736 views
    • 7 replies
    • 669 views
    • 34 replies
    • 1.3k views
    • 8 replies
    • 703 views
  9. The name of the chose

    • 15 replies
    • 628 views
    • 16 replies
    • 708 views
    • 9 replies
    • 538 views
  10. Civil Disobediance

    • 24 replies
    • 1.1k views
  11. Simon Cowell

    • 6 replies
    • 976 views
  • Latest Discussions

    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...