Sue

mikese22 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > has anyone actually spoken to Somerfield? > > If their head office PR department knew about this > debate they'd be horrified I'm sure xxxxxx Somerfield do know about the debate. Their head office issued a statement which I believe is posted earlier on this thread. They sent it to admin.

:))Lizziedjango Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I am afraid that accompanying it with a smiley and > a 'sorry couldn't resist' does not make it 'OK' in > my book. This is a thread about the Co-op and > therefore not really the place to attempt to > correct how people write. 'Sue' could have PM'ed. > me and that would have been more appropriate. xxxxxx My name's Sue, not 'Sue', and coming back from a day out to read this has really brightened my day - rofl :)) I wasn't "attempting to correct how people write", I was making what I thought was a funny comment - sorry you took it so personally. I have an MA in psychology, shall I analyse your response? :)):)) Ooops sorry, perhaps I should have PMed you.

Lizziedjango Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- Also the staff doesn't speak very good English at all. xxxxxx Doesn't they? Sorry, couldn't resist :)

Lady Nunhead Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > excellent food - nicely presented, and very, very clean xxxxxx Do you have a cleanliness obsession?? Do you often get dirty food?? :))

Went there last night for the first time, and had a bar snack. The thick-cut chips were excellent, but I was rather taken aback by the very small portion for ?3. I was slightly disappointed by the atmosphere - found the lighting too harsh (and the tealights didn't come out till very late on in the evening ..... though the harsh lighting remained) - whole place felt a bit bare and "cold" (not temperature wise) - hopefully they will have some lovely real fires in the Winter which will make it seem more cosy. Do agree it's the best of the recent incarnations, and the wine was good (comes from Green and Blue apparently) though not much choice by the glass.

Rabbler Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > When, oh when will East dulwich finally get a > working class chain pub with decent prices & > affordable food? > I don't suppose anyone from Wetherspoons reads > this do they? xxxxxx There's a Wetherspoons just down the road in Forest Hill ..... And isn't there one in Peckham?

Shame, it clashes with the Goose's free folk night at Hoopers - would have liked to have come to the Duke, too, as haven't been down there to see its latest incarnation ..... See you all in October :)

Thanks for the explanation Tropica, I feel a bit better about the palm now :) And at least we didn't get council-chosen sculpture ......

What was the tree on the public consultation document, macroban? I can't remember (though I'm sure I would have commented on it in my response if it had been a palm tree!)

Muttley Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Is it just me, or is our new friend the palm tree > looking a little bit unwell - leaf tips turning > brown, and what looks like a dead branch. Maybe > it's the lack of sunshine. Is there a tree doctor > in the house? xxxxxx No it's not just you,I've been noticing it for a while. It's been getting gradually worse. Maybe it's just adapting to its new situation, but my suspicion is it's not actually suited to that situation. I meant to look it up - the brown tips could be windburn. They've possibly planted something they think will be suited to the ED climate in fifty years' time, without considering the shorter term - but who knows. :-S

Another word in for Ganapati - but Keef, I'm sure they do change their menu - I went once and they didn't have my favourite - I mentioned I was disappointed - when our order came, they'd made me up a little dish of it specially, and didn't charge. Now that's service :)

Please don't blame yourself, it wasn't your fault. In the country at night, you can en hear small creatures squealing as they are carried off by owls etc.. and sometimes in the daytime too. I had a bird of prey make off with a screaming starling in my garden in ED. I know it's upsetting to witness, but basically animals kill each other. It doesn't sound like it was your rat poison that did it.

I've only eaten there once, and the whole place reeked of toilet freshener, which put me off my food somewhat! However the food and service were OK (but we were quite early so they weren't very busy). My gripe with the Herne is their advertising a beer festival via posters with no times on, then closing the beer tent early (I think it was 9.30pm) "because we don't want people making a noise in the garden, but you can buy a beer from the bar and bring it into the garden if you want". Erm, some error in logic there? :))

Big K Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Sue...get a life...and quit your constant use of > smileys.. Argh! xxxxxx I've got a life which I'm enjoying very much thanks, hence my "constant use of smileys". Sorry I and they irritate you so much you have to spend part of your life commenting on them on a public forum! I shall continue to use smileys as much as I want, and you of course have the freedom not to use them at all if you wish! :)):)):)):)):)):)):)) :)-D

JohnL Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > KalamityKel Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Bon3yard ever tried doing the job yaself? It's > > not as easy as it looks ;-) > > Seem to have improved when trying to get rebates > on being charged a ?4 Oystercard fare. First time > I tried the lady in Canary Wharf just shouted 'You > must touch in and out' ad nauseum - seemed not to > realise that some of the equipment might be dodgy. > Recently in Canada Water the guy just refunded > the ?4 - no questions asked. > > I'm sure some machines struggle when you have ?2 > or less on the card (They take off ?4 then refund > the difference on touching out it seems). xxxx Off topic, but if you top up your Oyster card automatically online, you can get a printout of your journey history, and you can easily check whether you have been overcharged. On topic, I have had a few bad bus experiences recently (176 driver completely missed out the stop at the Elephant, so a load of people waiting to get off had to walk all the way back from the other side of the roundabout; 40 driver of half-empty bus failed to stop when hailed at request stop). I got the reg number and the run number (on the side of the bus) of the 176, but when I tried to report it via the tfl website, I got a "this email address is not known" message back! Would it be too cynical to suppose that tfl is trying to minimise the number of complaints it has to a) deal with b) publicise statistics of? I just couldn't be bothered to pursue it any further :-S

monica Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I say bring back signature, > obviously chip and pin is not fraud proof, and why > dont the americans use the same system. (?) xxxxx Anybody can forge a signature, it's easy - anyway, most people never checked them very thoroughly, just a quick glance, in my experience

Well it's amazing it arrived at all - I posted a vintage postcard to my sister-in-law for her birthday last year, stupidly not putting it in an envelope, and it never arrived - I assume it was nicked en route from the East Dulwich postbox I posted it in to her East Dulwich address. :(

Pippo Inzaghi Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > the open air it would be quite fitting, and > perhaps more relevant than ever even though it's > 20+ years old.> > > Top suggestion. In fact, the best suggestion. > > They screened this onto the outside of the South > Bank two or three years back and it was wicked. > > That was free, ?7.50 is OTT, a fiver would be > acceptable. > > Px xxxxxx Can't remember the name of the burger place that used to be next to Liquorish before the place that's there now, but they used to have koyanisqaatsi on their screen on a loop :) Edited to remove typo - what a saddo I am :)

ceefer99 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Chez Bruce is definitely on Wandsworth Common & I > had to book six weeks in advance to secure a table > for two on a Saturday evening! It's also SW London > ..17 (I think) sorry to be a pedant :) xxxxxxx Also being a pedant, it's actually SW18 - my parents used to live just up the road :)

Thought Chez Bruce was on Wandsworth Common not in Balham? Am I thinking of somewhere else?

Pierre Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > ...and off we go again. ;) > > > : P xxxxxx OK next time I should just ignore comments like that about me? GGGGRRRRRRRR :)) :-S Edited to say: This is a forum - geddit? People respond to each other's posts :)

Loz Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > Totally agree. Gobsmacked at some of the posts > on this thread. > > Sorry, you're right. Shall we organise the a > suitably sized mob to meet tomorrow by the > playground and sort this pervert out? What do you > think: hang him from the nearest tree or just cut > his whatsits off? Maybe we can ask Sky Sports to > cover the event? > > Honestly Sue - given your previous posts, you were > the last person I would have picked as one of the > Daily Mail brigade. What convinced you of this > man's guilt? What put you off my idea calling in > someone suitable, like the police, to have him > properly investigated versus the much more > expedient he's-obviously-guilty lynch mob > approach? xxxxxx Just seen this, sorry if interrupting, don't have time to read the rest of the thread at the moment. How can you label me "one of the Daily Mail brigade" (what are they exactly?) for thinking there's something wrong about a man filming children secretly (camera at waist height fgs), not making himself known to the mothers, need I go on? Do you label people according to some idea you have that "because they've said this, therefore they should think that?" Because I say this man should have been approached and questioned, and that I would have done so (I have an 18-month-old granddaughter and could well have been in the playground with her) you think therefore I think he is guilty and should be strung up? What does that say about you? You think it would have been preferable to call the police? By the time they'd arrived he would probably have gone. Anyway, bit heavy if he had a perfectly innocent motive, no? :-S

casper Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I do find the attitude of some on this post very > strange. It almost seems that some people wish to > defend the indefensible for the sake of it. I > admit that I am a father of an 8 month old > daughter, but how could you possibly think that a > man on his own trying to secretly film children at > waist level is ok? All I will say is that he was > lucky that it was children with their mothers who > were there, I am not so sure if at a weekend with > my own child I would have been as charitable. xxxxxxx Totally agree. Gobsmacked at some of the posts on this thread. :-S

Erm, if you look down the page a bit you will see a previous thread with a virtually identical subject :))

Brendan Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- >> > Mate considering the weirdos wot walk the streets > and cyber waves of this suburb I suggest a > surrealist bar. Geremy?s muffin didn?t do it but > I do know a lobster who is looking for a job as a > barman. xxxxx How many surrealists does it take to open a bar? Seven - Two to train the hamster, one to marry the cavalier?s helmet full of Greek yoghurt, and a turnip shaped like a goldfish. :))