Jump to content

KalamityKel

Member
  • Posts

    6,731
  • Joined

Everything posted by KalamityKel

  1. tomszekeres Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Iceland needs to go. They mistreat farmers, the > meat is factory farmed, they essentially sell > cheap and nasty nutrient-free carbohydrates > instead of the protein and fats our ancestors ate. > It's an inconvenient truth, but cheap, processed > food is a false economy. In Mediterranean > countries rich and poor all eat real food and the > divergence in life expectancy is far narrower. > > Stop apologising for Iceland as some kind of poor > man's champion. It's offensive. They're preying on > the poor, peddling obesity, diabetes, and other > metabolic disorders. Good riddance. Just like every other retail company... get real man *sighs*
  2. I do have a fair number of friends of both genders (20-35 kind of age bracket) doing the whole online dating thing and have done so for many years. Mixed reviews but it can't be too bad as they're still doing it... personally I'm not overly convinced but certainly don't have anything against the idea. It's the norm these days it would seem.
  3. I hope you've reported your sightings to the police?
  4. TheArtfulDogger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > KalamityKel Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > TheArtfulDogger Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > KalamityKel Wrote: > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > ----- > > > > natty01295 Wrote: > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > ----- > > > > > Females sexy birds - women only > > > > > > > > That's not particularly descriptive... > but... > > > darn > > > > that's me out *sobs* :-p > > > > > > You mean ... OMG ... That you aren't a woman > kel > > ? > > > > Maybe... mayb not ;-) :p > > It's all flooding back, that nightclub in > Thailand, a steamy night with one of the dancers > after and a walk like Johm Wayne in the > morning.... That was you wasn't it Kel!!! > > I now need to talk to you urgently about the > paternity case against you as a result of that > night 😉 I think you may be thinking of my cousins half brothers uncles uncles, cousin twice removed best friends, husbands sisters sisters daughters girlfriend there Artful me dear ;-) *grins* Sorry natty, appreciating I'm stomping over your thread... Are you good looking and rich? :-))
  5. TheArtfulDogger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > KalamityKel Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > natty01295 Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > Females sexy birds - women only > > > > That's not particularly descriptive... but... > darn > > that's me out *sobs* :-p > > You mean ... OMG ... That you aren't a woman kel ? Maybe... mayb not ;-) :p
  6. natty01295 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Females sexy birds - women only That's not particularly descriptive... but... darn that's me out *sobs* :-p
  7. I think most important than having others feedback back on experiences would be for you to identify with yourself why you are considering such an avenue in the first place? What are your views on tattoos? I'm being serious... do you have a negative attitude to tattoos?
  8. makes the tour of said potential future employment work place a tad difficult though doesn't it? ;-)
  9. or just a smack in the face :-D
  10. Does this change anything about the stops in question in any way? *curious*
  11. OMG OMG OMG the power went off for 10 mins... We're DOOMED! DOOMED! It's the end of the world! It's the Tories! I don't know how we're going to cope if this continues... ^^^ that kinda thing!
  12. Help-Ma-Boab Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > When you have a stone in your shoe, turns out it's > in your sock. That. Or Tights... much worse!
  13. Don't know what the email address is but according to Twitter there is certainly a lot of talk about "emailing" them to sort problems...
  14. The "tear here" tag on a packet of crackers/biscuits
  15. It's like you're in my mind!!! :O
  16. haha! yes exactly so ;-)
  17. robbin it has nothing to do with my view on the outcome (which I don't believe I have expressed anywhere on this thread either for or against) - it was admitted in the meeting that none of it (previous application) was handled properly forcing the application through. With this in mind what hope is there that it will be handled any better this time round? There are already signs - residents failing to be notified, as a simple example - that it's just a repeat of before.
  18. I heard men tend to get a tad processive in such situations...
  19. cl Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Erm, lets not kid ourselves that it will all be > sorted at the planning committee meeting. > > They didn't sort it last time. In fact, they > mainly acknowledged how badly it had been dealt > with by the council...... But then decided to > approve it anyway. I remember quite clearly one of > the counsellors who voted in favour turning round > once it was a done deal, looking me in the eye and > offering me an sympathetic shrug as if to say 'I'm > sorry, there's just nothing I could do'. Which > clearly was not the case. She could have voted > against. > > James are you able to do anything in advance to > encourage them to grow some balls this time round > rather than just rolling over again? Sadly I recall a similar response from a different councillor too. I'd like to think someone somewhere would step up and ensure everything was done properly but I seriously doubt it :-\
  20. Ah...I see ya point. kinda
  21. cl out of curiousity did you receive any notification of this new application?
  22. gh, they already have the go-ahead for residential use...
  23. the-e-dealer Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'm looking for women only too. women? Surely one's enough? Greedy! :p
  24. The "offices" in question were previously applied for and granted as additional housing robbin. If planning is granted on this application the penthouses would be in addition to the housing already granted even if the intention is to keep the space as offices.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...