Jump to content

KalamityKel

Member
  • Posts

    6,720
  • Joined

Everything posted by KalamityKel

  1. Help-Ma-Boab Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > When you have a stone in your shoe, turns out it's > in your sock. That. Or Tights... much worse!
  2. Don't know what the email address is but according to Twitter there is certainly a lot of talk about "emailing" them to sort problems...
  3. The "tear here" tag on a packet of crackers/biscuits
  4. It's like you're in my mind!!! :O
  5. haha! yes exactly so ;-)
  6. robbin it has nothing to do with my view on the outcome (which I don't believe I have expressed anywhere on this thread either for or against) - it was admitted in the meeting that none of it (previous application) was handled properly forcing the application through. With this in mind what hope is there that it will be handled any better this time round? There are already signs - residents failing to be notified, as a simple example - that it's just a repeat of before.
  7. I heard men tend to get a tad processive in such situations...
  8. cl Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Erm, lets not kid ourselves that it will all be > sorted at the planning committee meeting. > > They didn't sort it last time. In fact, they > mainly acknowledged how badly it had been dealt > with by the council...... But then decided to > approve it anyway. I remember quite clearly one of > the counsellors who voted in favour turning round > once it was a done deal, looking me in the eye and > offering me an sympathetic shrug as if to say 'I'm > sorry, there's just nothing I could do'. Which > clearly was not the case. She could have voted > against. > > James are you able to do anything in advance to > encourage them to grow some balls this time round > rather than just rolling over again? Sadly I recall a similar response from a different councillor too. I'd like to think someone somewhere would step up and ensure everything was done properly but I seriously doubt it :-\
  9. Ah...I see ya point. kinda
  10. cl out of curiousity did you receive any notification of this new application?
  11. gh, they already have the go-ahead for residential use...
  12. the-e-dealer Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'm looking for women only too. women? Surely one's enough? Greedy! :p
  13. The "offices" in question were previously applied for and granted as additional housing robbin. If planning is granted on this application the penthouses would be in addition to the housing already granted even if the intention is to keep the space as offices.
  14. which would seem still to be quite inconsistent... those it doesn't actually effect get notified where as those it does effect are kept in the dark (possibly perhaps quite literally in this case!)
  15. Burbage Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- open for standard > consultation till 15th May. And yet, again, hardly any of the neighbours have been notified - many of those that commented the last time are completely unaware there is this "application" currently sitting in planning.
  16. I'm guessing something big and black... :-s
  17. Shhhh don't tell everyone, they'll all want some!
  18. I think the idea with the "Boris" buses was to introduce (reintroduce?) them to the routes that were previously routemaster buses and in particular those routes that serve particular sections of central London... I really really dislike the term "Boris" buses - it's a bus for goodness sake!
  19. Night Buses bus due in 11 mins... ok
  20. Sue Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Jah Lush Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > what gets my goat is > > people changing their forum names and then > trying > > to work out who they were in a former guise. > > Don't the people changing their names remember who > they were before, then? > > Sorry :)) I've heard not... *looks around*
  21. Im still lost on the "patronising" bit... :s
  22. dogfenneldill Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > Er.. and shocking business about the disruption > etc etc Not sure if that is a nice bit of sarcasm there (hoping!) - if not, oh come now, one weekend of PLANNED disruption on something that is essential. Such closures for cranes happen all the time in other areas blocking off roads, putting buses on diversion etc. Inconvenient - yes. End of the world - no.
  23. You could try uninstalling and then reinstalling... and checking if there is any "job" waiting to be completed... maybe a driver update issue (usually starts playing up even if nothing has actually changed!)? Home printers are rubbish for long life and certainly if you've had it for a while it may just be time to get a new one :)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...