Jump to content

KalamityKel

Member
  • Posts

    6,727
  • Joined

Everything posted by KalamityKel

  1. TheArtfulDogger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > KalamityKel Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > natty01295 Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > Females sexy birds - women only > > > > That's not particularly descriptive... but... > darn > > that's me out *sobs* :-p > > You mean ... OMG ... That you aren't a woman kel ? Maybe... mayb not ;-) :p
  2. natty01295 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Females sexy birds - women only That's not particularly descriptive... but... darn that's me out *sobs* :-p
  3. I think most important than having others feedback back on experiences would be for you to identify with yourself why you are considering such an avenue in the first place? What are your views on tattoos? I'm being serious... do you have a negative attitude to tattoos?
  4. makes the tour of said potential future employment work place a tad difficult though doesn't it? ;-)
  5. or just a smack in the face :-D
  6. Does this change anything about the stops in question in any way? *curious*
  7. OMG OMG OMG the power went off for 10 mins... We're DOOMED! DOOMED! It's the end of the world! It's the Tories! I don't know how we're going to cope if this continues... ^^^ that kinda thing!
  8. Help-Ma-Boab Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > When you have a stone in your shoe, turns out it's > in your sock. That. Or Tights... much worse!
  9. Don't know what the email address is but according to Twitter there is certainly a lot of talk about "emailing" them to sort problems...
  10. The "tear here" tag on a packet of crackers/biscuits
  11. It's like you're in my mind!!! :O
  12. haha! yes exactly so ;-)
  13. robbin it has nothing to do with my view on the outcome (which I don't believe I have expressed anywhere on this thread either for or against) - it was admitted in the meeting that none of it (previous application) was handled properly forcing the application through. With this in mind what hope is there that it will be handled any better this time round? There are already signs - residents failing to be notified, as a simple example - that it's just a repeat of before.
  14. I heard men tend to get a tad processive in such situations...
  15. cl Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Erm, lets not kid ourselves that it will all be > sorted at the planning committee meeting. > > They didn't sort it last time. In fact, they > mainly acknowledged how badly it had been dealt > with by the council...... But then decided to > approve it anyway. I remember quite clearly one of > the counsellors who voted in favour turning round > once it was a done deal, looking me in the eye and > offering me an sympathetic shrug as if to say 'I'm > sorry, there's just nothing I could do'. Which > clearly was not the case. She could have voted > against. > > James are you able to do anything in advance to > encourage them to grow some balls this time round > rather than just rolling over again? Sadly I recall a similar response from a different councillor too. I'd like to think someone somewhere would step up and ensure everything was done properly but I seriously doubt it :-\
  16. Ah...I see ya point. kinda
  17. cl out of curiousity did you receive any notification of this new application?
  18. gh, they already have the go-ahead for residential use...
  19. the-e-dealer Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'm looking for women only too. women? Surely one's enough? Greedy! :p
  20. The "offices" in question were previously applied for and granted as additional housing robbin. If planning is granted on this application the penthouses would be in addition to the housing already granted even if the intention is to keep the space as offices.
  21. which would seem still to be quite inconsistent... those it doesn't actually effect get notified where as those it does effect are kept in the dark (possibly perhaps quite literally in this case!)
  22. Burbage Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- open for standard > consultation till 15th May. And yet, again, hardly any of the neighbours have been notified - many of those that commented the last time are completely unaware there is this "application" currently sitting in planning.
  23. I'm guessing something big and black... :-s
  24. Shhhh don't tell everyone, they'll all want some!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...