KalamityKel

Ouch!

((((forum hug))))

I've used a map of Westminster, folded it once, twice, three times (a lady)... I couldn't possibly repeat my findings at the corner! *blush*

I doubt it has anything to do with the "experience" of any officer regardless of rank as these things have been going on for years.

Jeremy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > Is the main conern about parking space for > immediate neighbours on Chesterfield Grove? Does the entire road and neighbouring roads class as "immediate"? Sorry I don't want to get into the parking debate which is always an ongoing grumbling issue with Chesterfield Grove. The development is just an added stress not the cause. The issues, which have been gone over and over again remain the same - MarkT points out Southwark's policies versus "precedent" - What is the point of having any policy in place if it's always going to be ignored? The site it not suited to the additional storey. If you have a look at the rear of the site you can clearly see what looked like a "small scale" extension in the application is nothing like it in reality. Neighbours residential properties are experiencing all sorts of issues/problems/grievances where the development is sitting up to their property. The scale of development is nothing like to the plans - you only have to take a nosey to realise this. It's just ridiculous. Residents feel incredibly let down by the planning department and even by our councillors. It seems genuine concerns expressed on many of the objections have been deemed irrelevant and not even addressed in any of the various applications. Why? Yes development is a necessity but sensible and considerate, not just for this particular site but as a whole. What is the point of having a planning department if anything and everything is passed?

brezzo Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > hard to beat a Wetherspoons steak Quite literally!

TheArtfulDogger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Jkartel Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Have you nothing better to do than worry about > a > > porta loo in the road? > > > I think the biggest issue here is that the > builders are taking the piss ... completely off topic, and I do apologise, but have I mentioned how much I love you Artful? Back on topic re: porta loos and the site in question... clarification on whether it's right or wrong for them (anyone not just here) to be allowed to place these loos on the road would be appreciated.

Jah Lush Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Looks seriously shite. Terrible signage. Hoping > for a lot better inside. Might pop in later or > tomorrow arvo to give it the once over. Hmmm in my nosiness looking at the "teasers" on their twitter feed... I think you might be disappointed *sighs*

JKartel - the whole issue of the development is a headache already where the builders/developers are doing whatever they please with regards to the land surrounding the site in particular the continued questionable issues of safety. KB is certainly within their rights to express concern AND James has asked to be kept informed.

first mate did you receive notification on the appeal? The same old thing where the appeal is based on farcical department that is "planning" inability to be able to make a decision within the given time frame...

I don't get the point being made here?

I wouldn't focus so much on what might or might not be - just continue with your child's development as you would have normally. 2yrs is too young, in my mind, to identify any traits that are not screamingly obvious. Enjoy the time you have with little one :)

Otta Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The first thing to remember is that the autistic > spectrum is huge and one person with ASD can > present completely differently to another. > > My daughter (coming up to 7) was diagnosed aged 4. > Probably would have been earlier but she was > basically failed by her (now closed by ofsted but > not for this reason) preschool. She is high > functioning and is more or less keeping up at > school, it's more the social stuff she struggles > with (much happier talking with adults, and tends > to play with boys because they're less > complicated). Sensory stuff is big for her, > particularly noise. She loved going to Dulwich > Hamlet with me a couple of times, but soon became > distressed at the noise levels and now doesn't > want to go. > > I work in SEN and am often in schools working with > kids at the severe end of the spectrum. I guess > this helps me have some perspective on how much > worse things could be, but that is not to say life > is without its challenges. And there is also her > little sister to think of, who maybe misses out on > some attention at times, and we feel guilty for > that. > > No one wants a diagnosis of ASD for their child, > but try to remain positive, my daughter cracks me > up with the way she looks at the world sometimes > :-) This is so true and incredibly important to remember. The spectrum is HUGE. Health officials are so keen to pop everyone in to a category that doesn't always make sense - they see things you might not think important. Whether it's right or wrong at such a young age I wouldn't worry about it too much but accept any additional help that might be given. Three of my brothers' children have been diagnosed with totally different levels of Autism. One is in his own little world most of the time, incredibly emotionally sensitive and sees things in a different yet very logical way to what is considered the "norm". He is at secondary school now, uses a laptop and recording devices allowing him to keep up with the class but has to be excused early at the end of the day to be escorted home. He was diagnosed fairly early, gets some support although perhaps not enough and certainly not much understanding from his secondary school but is doing well. Another is very sensitive to sound and can be a little OTT when she can't cope with large groups and is also quite a handful at times. Again, diagnosed early and receives different support to her brother. The other, almost 16, except for being a "typical" teenager with a few issues with anger management, you would never think there was anything wrong. My brother also has 3 other children (of varying ages) that are considered "normal". With the support the family receives for those on the spectrum, various techniques and lessons are also of a benefit to the others. I remember as a child myself when my brother was having speech therapy, although obviously the sessions catered for him I also benefited too. My main point is that although you are rightfully feeling shocked, out of your depth etc. it is not the end of the world. Take as much support that is offered. I'm a firm believer that children should be given as many opportunities given to help improve and progress as possible. Certainly don't feel like you have failed your child in any way.

Right that's it you lot that are newbies - moved here in the last 10 years (I'm being generous) clear off with your lowering the tone attitudes! :-p

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > People saying ... 'Oh ! Absolutely..' I think that might be more the people rather than what they are saying ;-)

beaver14uk Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Too late now, but to go back on this all buses > should stop on diversion thats the agreed > procedure. Doesn't always work out when the driver doesn't know where they're going... (obvs that more likely applies to first runs through a diversion or unscheduled/emergency diversions). But yes they should stop at other bus stops along the way

I feel much more reassured now that M&S is certainly still coming to town

James Barber Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > 2. We will need to be vigilant about the > conditions being followed. I hope after having one > legal notice served on the developers as a result > of a complaint where I represented some residents > that they'll be sensible to avoid more of this. What on earth makes you think that? Surely if they had ANY good intentions they would have been observing the rules in the first place! One legal notice about one occasion will not make a blind bit of difference. Yes you can slap yourself on that back about this but it shouldn't have happened in the first place. Ignorance can't be claimed by the builders OR M&S... James, seeing as you've openly acknowledged Southwark Council have failed to do things properly, how far are you at making an official complaint about planning on behalf of those (residents) that have been let down? You have said that you represent the people and not the Council...

clockworkorange Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I've heard tinder is pretty good for meeting > people. Also the car park on Peckham rye. only between the hours of 6 and 8.30pm though! (so I've heard)

Belopple are you saying you are wanting to meet new people your own age, make friends and get a girlfriend or just letting us know of your status amongst society?

New Girl Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'm annoyed because instead of making routes > better and more accessible in SE London, they > change them or cut them or don't even bother. > Rahrahrah hit the nail on the head with what I was > trying to get at(and expressed much more > eloquently). SE transport infrastructure is > lacking. I disagree - it's a bloomin' good service we have already! Yes there's room for improvement but that's the same for many things! ETA - the night service is a godsend! Go back 10+ years, that's where you could've been sitting there complaining.

Hmmm I never understand the general attitude as if it's the end of the world when a small alteration to any route occurs... it's NOT a huge deal. You'll have to a walk a little if you need to be further up. The whole business with elephant is a silly grumble - we all know it's going to take a while for everything to be completed and for regular road users to become familiar with the new layout (hence the traffic) so be sensible and allow a little extra for your journey - get up earlier and think ahead instead of leaving things to the last minute. *shrugs*

If the council come back with a ridiculous response that they dont consider that particular spot a "trip hazard" (as they often do) keep on at them. Sorry to hear of ya ouchies Sue. I fully sympathise - i had a collision with a pavement during the summer (not round here) nothing broken, lots of blood, ruined spare glasses and a bruised ego (left feeling incredibly stupid)... (((you)))

Its certainly much better than it used to. If u have difficulties wiv appointments dont just meekly mumble and accept it. Speak up ask their advice how to get an appointment and be firm whilst appearing flexible and willing to find a solution and ur sorted :-)

Bog standard proceedure since the beginning of time... get wiv it man!