Jump to content

uncleglen

Member
  • Posts

    4,103
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by uncleglen

  1. I always look and see how many of the poor creatures were put down after- it used to be a lot...especially the National Hunt races obviously- and as for the proliferation of gambling most of you voted for her! https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1474933/Opponents-of-new-gambling-law-are-snobs-says-Tessa-Jowell.html
  2. try this- you should invest in a very good pair of hairdressing scissors though https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=how+to+cut+your+own+kids%27+hair&rlz=1C1CHWA_enGB524GB538&oq=how+to+cut+your+own+kids%27+hair&aqs=chrome..69i57.13947j1j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#kpvalbx=1
  3. tomskip Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Don't you vegans worry about the enormous amount > of food processing that goes in to manufacturing > something called vegan "cheese" and vegan "bacon". I've always thought that since a relative of mine lives on 'Cheat Meat' and stuff that looks like streaky bacon but ALL the slices are the same- What's wrong with good old-fashioned straight-up vegetables and there's nothing like a mushroom or a soya bean curry!
  4. rendelharris Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Deliberate choice of word Uncle? Glad to hear it, > looking at the majority of your posts I assumed > they were just created by a random Daily Mail > froth generator. > > If you took two seconds to look at the discussion, > you'd see that it is actually RPC who's arguing > for a more PC form of language, saying we mustn't > use the term "lunatic" in any context because it's > offensive to those with MH issues, and I argued > against that. RPC actually obviously feels > sincerely about this and I rather regret being > quite so aggressive about it (though I wasn't > until I was accused of being the same as someone > saying "Paki" or "Gyppo"). However, you're just > jumping without an ounce of thought on the > opportunity to have a go at "the PC brigade" > without thinking at all about who's said what. > But I'm guessing you don't often engage the old > brain before rushing to comment. I will have a go at the as a matter of course - I don't care who said what since the responses are so predictable...in your bourgie way
  5. '...the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few'
  6. 'Hasta la vista baby'
  7. I've always gone to West Croydon from Forest Hill
  8. 'Open your mind..'
  9. Robert Poste's Child Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Rendel, what's tiresome is how quickly you retreat > into moral outrage and personal attack when > someone has an opinion that's opposed to yours. > For what it's worth, I've worked in communication > and mental health so perhaps I just have a more > developed awareness around this than you do! It is a lot easier to 'talk the talk' when you have a set view that conforms to the current PC brigade (deliberate choice of word) because then you don't have to think about it- unless Rendel is playing devil's advocate just to stir stuff up.
  10. malumbu Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Dear EDF. Please save your ranting until after > decisions have been made by the Rozzers, CPS etc. > If after that you are still angry then continue > the debate, sign petitions, write to your MP/PM > etc. You'll find it is good for your blood > pressure if you save your views until then. > Meanwhile for those of you who disagree with me > there is always the Daily Mail web site where you > can vent your anger. > > We're not bad a the rule of law in Blighty. Not > perfect. By all means debate that. The CPS are totally incompetent in my experience- the police will do their utmost but they may as well bang their heads on a brick wall- I feel sorry for them.
  11. sidebirds Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > rendelharris Wrote: > > > > > - > > Peckhamguy's absurd statement that "the true > > working class who has never had nothing handed > to > > them on a plate the ones who actually see the > real > > world" > > Nothing wrong with the quoted statement. The > working-classes get it in the neck first and > millions of them are righteously p*ssed off after > having their wishes flouted by several decades of > elected politicians. Even David Blunkett had something similar to say in 2014- it's a pity the rest of them didn't take note- too busy chasing votes https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/oct/28/david-blunkett-praises-michael-fallon-swamped-migrants
  12. apbremer Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Perhaps these proselytising bleeding hearts might > feel a little differently if it was their house > and family invaded and threatened in the night by > this vicious filth? I daresay they would- but they would never admit to it!
  13. JohnL Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > If you're caught with a knife twice it's a > mandatory 6 months > > Is that how I should read it (unless there are > exceptional circumstances) ? > > https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/offences/item > /bladed-article-offensive-weapon-possession-of/ > > "When sentencing the offences of; > Possession of an offensive weapon in a public > place; > Possession of an article with a blade/ point in a > public place; > Possession of an offensive weapon on school > premises; and > Possession of an article with blade/ point on > school premises > a court must impose a sentence of at least 6 > months imprisonment where this is a second or > further relevant offence unless the court is of > the opinion that there are particular > circumstances relating to the offence or the > offender which make it unjust to do so in all the > circumstances. > A ?relevant offence? includes those offences > listed above and the following offences; > Threatening with an offensive weapon in a public > place; > Threatening with an article with a blade/ point in > a public place; > Threatening with an article with a blade/ point on > school premises; and > Threatening with an offensive weapon on school > premises." I can tell you now- there are at least 3 schools in South London that would NOT take the possession of a blade or point, or threatening with a blade or point- any further than the Deputy Head in charge of behaviour! Which of course is why it was not nipped in the bid decades ago when we possibly had the prison/ youth offenders' places.
  14. JohnL Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > rendelharris Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > rahrahrah Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > kford Wrote: > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > ----- > > > > Some sad quitters are doing this to their > own > > > cars > > > > apparently. > > > > > > Taking back control. Perhaps we could have > > black > > > and white plates again. > > > > > https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/786435/BREXIT-BO > > > > MBSHELL-EU-demands-UK-number-plate-RECALLED-2019 > > Every day is the 1st of April at Express Towers > :). some people cannot stand the bare faced truth
  15. JohnL Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'm not going to trust British Gas figures but I > agree it's very doubtful Putin would do this. > > He has his own (sad) problem at the moment with > the fire in Kemerovo. > > https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/27/world/europe/ru > ssia-kemerovo-fire.html I doubt if he sees it as HIS problem- if he did it wouldn't have happened in the first place, health and safety etc would have been in place. People live in terrible conditions in some places in Russia ...and if he is prepared to endanger the lives of innocent Brits in Salisbury then it is obvious he does not give a stuff
  16. It will have something to do with the Dulwich College Estate
  17. spider69 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Vote them out in May. Good luck with that- there are 13 Lib Dems, 2 Conservative and about 48 Labour members on the Southwark council and since we have a Conservative government then the Southwark residents will just have to get used to being shoved around and it being blamed on so-called 'tory cuts'- because of local democracy ALL the money that comes from central government can be used in any way that the Council chooses....and you can bet said tax payers' money will NOT be used primarily to improve our quality of life
  18. the worst thing about large vehicles outside your home is that it provides some cover for would-be burglars
  19. How low can 'people' sink? It's obviously a nappy bag. Have a look on eBay- that's where it will probably turn up!
  20. Doesn't matter what our foreign policy is- that is just used by jihadis to justify terrorist acts. Islam declared war on the west aeons ago- we have chemical jihad, jihadi rape etc etc going on 24/7 in Europe. Overt acts of terrorism are the actions that slipped through the surveillance net- unfortunately for the French cop in the supermarket yesterday
  21. No surprise- except that it didn't happen sooner... https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/5216851/self-scan-shoppers-supermarkets-stealing-3-billion-year/
  22. P.O.U.S.theWonderCat Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > @ peckham_ryu > > Indeed. What is it about these "movements" that > attract dim losers? They are clearly > overcompensating for deficiences elsewhere with > their tough guy routines. Interestingly, when I joined the WRP years back (me and my mate fancied a couple of girls), they were telling us to persuade black people to join them and gave distinct instructions on the lines of chat. When I left the WRP I was threatened with physical violence...I left because they were a bunch of idiots and only interested in power for themselves- and of course it gave the air-heads of the theatrical world an opportunity for virtue signalling- I mean it is VERY easy to be a libtard when you are well off!
  23. Yes well, as usual, Southwark can afford to pay people to come up with a 284 page document but as for actually DEALING with the problem http://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/documents/b50007773/Appendices%20Tuesday%2031-Jan-2017%2014.00%20Health%20and%20Wellbeing%20Board.pdf?T=9
  24. The hatred is palpable....I expect they have a mental defect like all terrorists
  25. maybe the older people are coughing to say' I'm here and I'm trying to watch the film in peace'....would you confront the noisy people last time I did I was told to 'F off if I don't like it'....I was 25 and with my pregnant OH....it was over 20 years ago so things have probably got worse but I don't go to the cinema anymore
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...