Spartacus

Looks like a good turnout and possibly the most use the so called "Dulwich Square" has ever seen.

Maybe suggest it to Sadiq, I'm sure he will fund one with his picture on as a vanity project to fly from every bus and train proclaiming every trip is important to him and TfL

Yesterday I was alerted to a hospital appointment (for yesterday) when I had a call saying they had to move it. I enquired how they informed me of the original appointment and a letter was sent out 3 weeks ago. The backlog at the sorting office is now causing knock on effects to a wider group of institutions and people. What's the solution and how are they going to clear the backlog or is this now the new norm ?

Let's not get into the so called Bellenden Village re-brand debacle. It's West Peckham 😃

legalalien Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Seems to be an anti LTN protest at he closed > junction this morning. Is that this month's Saturday activity on the so called Dulwich Square ? People get funding for the strangest of things 😉

It's no good arguing amongst ourselves over if traffic is higher or lower than what each other sees (I see no ships 😱) What we need to see is the figures that Southwark publish and the results of the consultation. Then we can debate what has happened, how accurate their interpretation is and what happens next As I understand it a decision may be due soon but I could be wrong on that.

I've now got a vision of you two standing near each other taking photos and nodding to each other without actually knowing who each of you is ... Go ahead say hello and see what happens 😃

FOMO I won't miss out if that goes 😆

Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Put down the tinfoil hat. LTNs are enforced by > cameras. It wouldn't make any sense for Southwark > (which doesn't operate ULEZ and whose LTN came > years after the ULEZ expansion and camera plan) to > channel traffic away from roads that are covered > by cameras to streets that are not necessarily > covered by cameras. > > Amazing that some people seem to simultaneously > believe that Southwark is completely incompetent > AND ALSO capable of pulling off a multiyear > conspiracy. > #SouthwarkDerangementSyndrome To add to your conspiracy theory DKHB, maybe Southwark's hit squad have also nobbled the posties /forum/read.php?5,2228764 so that any consultation information or PCNs is delivered late... And the leader of the council also appeared in his UFO over southwark towers to preach his message of build on greens and pollute poor people's roads.... Jasus you have an active imagination at times

Thanks Penguin The same warning obviously applies for hospital letters / appointments. Possibly worth calling the hospital(s) if you are expecting a letter or appointment. Bring back the ED sorting office 😭

Or smoking up in the hills Billy ?

Rockets and what ever happens next to the councillors depends on how they treat their voters. Especially as "They seem hell bent on ignoring and depositioning any opinion or view that differs from their own!" May isn't that far away after all ...🤔

You could try pipe repair tape but always best to tie it in with a wire tie after sticking it on to give a stronger seal

Have you got a network cable that you can plug into your router and PC which will give you access to the 192.168.... option ?

I found this article online for you https://kb.netgear.com/23517/How-do-I-set-up-my-NETGEAR-WiFi-range-extender Try using the address in the format of 192.168.1.... (possibly 150 as the last 3 digits) as that takes you directly to your netgear extender setup page rather than through the website you mentioned above. Hopefully the article helps

Sue Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Pop. > > As in eihter a "pop" of colour, GRRRRRR or "I'll > pop it through your letter box" etc GRRRRRRR What about pop as in lashings and lashings of fizzy pop ? Surely you can't object to that otherwise you will destroy the bedrock foundation of the famous five 😱

Alan Medic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > From the little I know about this, the main > complaint about a rise in NI is that young people > will be paying for old people. Yet those old > people were once young people, and the current > young people will hopefully become old people. So > what's wrong with that? Especially as the old people who have paid their NI stamp when they were young actually ended up funding social care for the elders of their generation in the understanding that when they got old the young would be funding their care. Saying that they shouldn't increase the NI rate to look after them because it's unfair on the young is like robbing Paul when he was young and then returning to kick him in the nads after

Jason painter Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I was working in marmora re on Friday when an > electric van drove slowly up the road, it had a > camera on each corner and had Southwark council > markings. I can only assume it was registering > number plates. If it had council markings then it's unlikely to be for the purpose of ULEZ as that's a TfL initiative and the council have no input It's possibly more looking for untaxed or no mot vehicles so that the council can fine the owners

Alan Reading that, whilst fascinating, reminded me of the comedy series "goodness gracious me" where the father kept on saying "that's Indian, the British stole it from us" 😂

SpringTime Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > "Our story" > > Yeah, big deal about your story. I just want a > sandwich please. Bacon sandwich ?

Especially as its not rocket science 😉

There was a petition to get the ULEZ implementation date moved back a year as we are just (or just not) coming out of a pandemic where a lot of people were financially impacted and the cost of upgrading an essential car was going to be a problem for them. Not sure what happened to it but a similar one was rejected in March as it wasn't a government issue. I am surprised that as this is being implemented in 2 months that there hasn't been stronger publicity to say swap your car or pay to drive it.

Is there a link to the LBC interview ?

JohnL Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > and talking of trade ambassadors - what's Tony > Abbott done for us recently. As I read this , Janet Jackson's words came to mind

SpringTime Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Of course I'm not 100% sure but I wouldn't be at > all surprised if there's some form of collusion. > > (I was double jabbed nice and early, by the way!) So you're saying that the US and UK are sanctioning the use of suicide bombers now Wow Did we also not go to the moon, aliens are real and running the US government, and Elvis shot Kennedy before riding off on Sherguard to have an illicit affair with Lord Lucan ? Hope you've got your tin foil helmet on to stop the radio waves from altering your thinking...