Spartacus

Funny that Reopened just after the LTN consultation.... If I was suspicious.... But brilliant news none the less

malumbu Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > notimpressed Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Who in this day and age says 'sir'? I prefer to > > address people as 'mush' or 'fella'. > > You're my rocka-fella, You're my Cinder-ella,, ooo > ooo oooo oooohh You sir, need to get out more....

I'll hazard a guess, after Covid , "me old China" is possibly out of Vogue now! Even though it's cockney for China plate (mate)

I believe that The Lane safer neighbourhood police team have this on their list of ward priorities and you should contact that team directly to report any issues rather than the council who are not the right people to deal with this It's potentially a multi agency issue and the starting point is the SNT. 020 8721 2769 [email protected]

Seabag Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > British workers (I use that phrase lightly) have > become more dexterous on the Dominos Pizza app. This exactly

KK has it Seabag. But again you seem to be posting two different answers on two different threads Is this like the two Ronnie's mastermind sketch where the chosen subject was answering the question before 🤔

malumbu Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hello John Gotta new motor ?

Seabag Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I?m quite enamoured with ?Pal? as long as the > person saying it is from Scotland. > > ?Mate? is ok if you?re from Manchester. > > ?Buddy? seems to be growing as a term of > endearment. > > ?Fella? I?m indifferent about. Now we're all confused ... have you posted in the right place?

Zorry My Miztake (now that gets me when "s" is replaced by "z" )

Struth cobber

The 19th of July (tomorrow) is being dubbed freedom day after a long lockdown. Numbers of covid cases are on the rise and hospital cases are also starting to show an uptick. Question is will you A) Keep taking the same precautions as you have been for the last few months (masks, a bit of social distancing, respect others space) B) Throw caution to the wind and gladly get rid of restrictions. or C) A combination of both depending on where you are and what you are doing.

Oh Sir That last one was a bit risky in a modern PC world

Nigello Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > It's an unwanted import! Sir / madam in a posh > shop or nice restaurant but not on in the CoOp > when you?re asking for Toilet Duck or on the 197! Confused Why are you asking for toilet duck on the 197 😱? If you are, they are calling you Sir because they are very very worried about you...

So the big question, going back to Renata's post nearly 8 months ago, is "what's happening to the faulty mast ?" Renata any update ?

Power to the People

rahrahrah Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > northernmonkey Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > > I suspect its because there is unity in > > disagreement to the current measures, but as > soon > > as people specify what they do support then > others > > will disagree. > > Exactly this. Which is the real reason that One > Dulwich are calling for people to support a > 'return to the current state'. > > The reality is that Low Traffic Neighbourhoods > boost cycling and reduce traffic. If you're in > favour of that, then you should generally be in > favour of LTNs The truth is that no matter what is suggested, no one trusts the council enough not to implement it in a way that disadvantages the area. I think the call to remove it then have a proper mediated study and consultation is the way forward. Especially as the majority of "non compliant" cars will soon be removed from the area as part of the ULEZ. What then? the council claiming a massive success for their schemes whilst tfl also claim the same (effectively double counting) Let's get a London wide scheme in first to see its impact before adding potentially unnecessary layers to the cake.

JohnL Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Looks like Leicester Square's been trashed. > > Not sure if the Police are going to let it go or > get aggressive today. If only London had water cannons to quell the trouble ...

I have to wonder why the council have extended the consultation. In my mind there are various scenarios: 1. They wanted to put out the traffic data, however that won't effect people who have completed it already. 2. They don't have many responses so providing extra time to gather a few more. 3. The responses they have so far aren't saying what the council wants to hear so more time has been added to bring in extra support for the LTNs (potentially from outside groups) I'll let others suggest scenarios and mull over the reasons why.

I hope the family are all okay and what a terrible thing to have happened. Edcam Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Despicable but unsurprising, given the atmosphere > the tories have created over the last few years. 😱 "Boris made me drink and act like a total twonk" claimed a football fan. That's a bit of a random association edcam especially as football thugs have been around almost as long as football has been played, so I suspect it was spured on by drink and a lack of emotional intelligence!

Just received this Dear all, Thank you for your continued engagement with our Review of the road schemes in Dulwich Village, East Dulwich and Champion Hill. Thousands of residents have already completed the consultation which can be found at https://www.southwark.gov.uk/dulwichstreetspacereview We want to allow some extra time for those who have not yet completed it, so we are extending the deadline to Sunday 18th July. We have also published a report on the monitoring data that we have obtained over the past couple of months. You can view this at https://www.southwark.gov.uk/dulwichstreetspacereview . We are going to hold an extra community meeting to discuss the data and what it tells us about the road schemes, on Tuesday 13th July 6pm. This will be an online meeting ? to register for the meeting please go to https://dulwichreviewdata.eventbrite.co.uk Kind regards, Southwark Highways

rahrahrah Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I fear we?re pretty screwed when it comes to > climate change and improving the environment. I > walked passed a house with a sports car, a huge > 4x4 SUV and a vintage car in their drive > yesterday. They had a ?Clean Air for All? and a > ?say no to road closures? sign displayed > unironically. The ironic thing is that the house you passed possibly is one of the few who can afford to convert their cars to fully electric so may well be part of the solution (providing they embrace electric cars)

There's a bloke in the Surrey Quays chip shop who swears he's Elvis ...

Maybe the council will use the ?3000 allocated to "dulwich square" events to put up an outdoor screen to show the game. But then again ....

Javid today said he expected up-to 100 thousand cases a day as a result of removing restrictions TfL are reviewing what they can do post the 17th to make mask wearing a requirement on public transport but if they don't then passenger numbers will decline again as some people won't feel safe or feel isolated by non mask wearers. If that happens more people will drive and roads will get more congested My comment is standby for chaos and if only 10% of the predicted infections get long covid then just wait to see how the NHS copes with that in the future. The 17th is a ticking time bomb that someone has to disarm whilst the delta and delta plus variants are on the rise.