red devil Wrote: > I've done another table putting in a flat score of > 5 points for missing a week. > This penalty needs to be low enough to act as an > incentive not to misss a week, but not too low so > as to deter latecomers into thinking they could > never catch up. > Does 5 sound about right? (FYI the average of > everybody's scores is 7.5) > Do people think this is a fairest system?.. Seems fair enough to me. We definitely needed an incentive to participate each week. Obviously there will be times when someone can't for one reason or another. Thanks for the work you've put in here. Much appreciated.