Parkdrive Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Jah Lush Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Not me unfortunately. It's the first time I've > > missed them in London since the 70s. They are a > > fantastic live band. The best. > > I saw them at Earls Court 1976, thought they were > great, but I remember saying at the time before > the gig, this lot are over the hill. They really > should give it a rest now. Yeah, I was there too. Saw 'em twice that year. Knebworth was the other one. As for the age thing it would seem it's perfectly all right for blues and jazz musicians to grow old and continue to perform and record so why can't The Stones? Rock n'roll or pop music in general has always been associated youth but these guys and many other musicians from the 60s/70s and beyond are still performing and their audience has grown up with them. Should artists do the same? Did Picasso stop painting once he got past 60? No, of course not and he produced some of his work well into his 70s. Bottom line is they are still very popular and that's why people still want to go and see them and for those that can afford these ridiculously over-inflated ticket prices will pay top dollar to do so. You can say they are past their best and I wouldn't argue with you but they can still put on a fantastic, powerful and energetic performance that people more than half their age don't even come close too. Enjoy the gig Giggirl.