Jump to content

Recommended Posts

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The ad to the left has a Pakistani email address,

> and the one above has a Karachi address?


They wouldn't really say "this is a full-time position due to our 24 hour poor service" :)


or maybe ....

  • 2 weeks later...

Surely the government has to make an example out of Southern. Despite woeful service, labour relations, and customer satisfaction, they are guaranteed profits each year. Not only that, but they have gone up year after year, despite requiring large government subsidies to run.


http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/markets/article-3452793/Go-Ahead-profits-soar-17-amid-deluge-customer-complaints.html

I'm nervous. Southern's new timetable page is on their website, here.


Here's the new map, colour coded to indicate changes.





Timetable #32 (the Beckenham route) suggests that no trains will start/terminate at Beckenham, but that trains servicing West Norwood, Crystal Palace and Gypsy Hill will continue in to Victoria

No service between London Bridge and Beckenham Junction

Please use alternative Southern, Tramlink, London Overground and Southeastern services to complete your journey. Southern tickets will also be accepted on local buses between West Norwood and Tulse Hill and between Crystal Palace, Birkbeck and Beckenham Junction.



Timetable #33 (the West Croydon route) suggests that the same trains will run as they have done in recent months


There is no posted timetable for the Wimbledon route (at least, not that I can find). The timetable page states:

No service between Sutton and Streatham via Wimbledon (this service normally operates during the peak only)

Tickets will be accepted on Thameslink services to and from London Blackfriars which will operate to a normal Monday to Friday timetable. Change at Streatham for alternative Southern services to London Bridge.



The inference I'm making here is that we will be down to two trains per hour - those to/from West Croydon. That would be a drastic reduction in service. Their journey planner isn't going to be updated until tomorrow, so until then we're reliant upon digging the info out ourselves.


That being the case, the new commuter services into London Bridge would be as follows:

from North Dulwich: 6:53, 7:27, 8:27, 9:28

from East Dulwich: 6:55, 7:30, 8:30, 9:30

from Peckham Rye: 6:58, 7:33, 8:33, 9:34


There is also an additional service which terminates at South Bermondsey: NDW 7:57, EDW 8:02, PMR 8:09


Notice that some of those services allow extra time between NDW and EDW than they used to (up to five minutes) and between EDW and PMR (up to seven minutes)


The services back home from London Bridge would depart LBG at:

16:10, 16:40, 17:11, 18:08, 18:51.

Yes, you've read that right, basically one train an hour. The off-peak service is actually more frequent than the peak service.


Someone please tell me I'm mistaken.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Lloyd Weber and Cilla Black were supposed to leave when Blair got in, but didn't
    • You can't have zero tolerance unless you live in a fascist/police state.  Sadly it is something you have to accept in a democracy.  There has always been crime, even in North Korea, the Soviet bloc, Nazi Germany, Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge etc.   The discussion point is how big a police force we need and capabilities, punishment, and building communities.  And how much we are prepared to pay in extra taxation. Even in the good (economic) times there is crime.  And crime under both Labour and Tory governments. I do not accept that phone thefts and parcel thefts are just statistics.  Police have to prioritise what they do, we might not agree with it.  And most criminals are multi-tasking, moving to where the best return is considering the risk of being caught. And there has to be a market, someone somewhere needs to buy a stolen product (I never buy off Gumtree). A starting point would be to decriminalise all illegal drugs, but that is definitely for a separate Lounge conversation, interesting discussion paper here: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/105520/1/A. Stevens - In defence of the decriminalisation of drug possession in the uk - PPDF.pdf Did you watch any of the series of Peaky Blinders?  This was a very popular series that glorified gang crime and violence.  Funny (ironic) that may enjoy films and TV that does this.  Although only the first series had any historical accuracy in it,  Criminal gangs were around before and ever since.    
    • Ah the oldest cliche in the book   ”I would leave if…”   but you wouldn’t leave if farage was prime minister ?
    • It seems we have to accept a certain level of crime as normal now… phone thefts, car thefts, parcels stolen from doorsteps…. they are just recorded as statistics.  When it’s invasive ( numerous home invasions in my street recently), one reported on the forum recently, Evri delivery had his car stolen, the man attacked in PRP a couple of weeks ago, reports of violent and threatening youths also in PRP… it goes on and on.  And now this poor woman brutally assaulted in daylight on a busy street. NONE of this is acceptable. There should be ZERO tolerance for such criminal acts. There is no denying the police have too much to deal with and not enough resources. It’s disgusting. It’s a misappropriation of public funds. More should be invested on our police force.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...