Jump to content

Recommended Posts

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The ad to the left has a Pakistani email address,

> and the one above has a Karachi address?


They wouldn't really say "this is a full-time position due to our 24 hour poor service" :)


or maybe ....

  • 2 weeks later...

Surely the government has to make an example out of Southern. Despite woeful service, labour relations, and customer satisfaction, they are guaranteed profits each year. Not only that, but they have gone up year after year, despite requiring large government subsidies to run.


http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/markets/article-3452793/Go-Ahead-profits-soar-17-amid-deluge-customer-complaints.html

I'm nervous. Southern's new timetable page is on their website, here.


Here's the new map, colour coded to indicate changes.





Timetable #32 (the Beckenham route) suggests that no trains will start/terminate at Beckenham, but that trains servicing West Norwood, Crystal Palace and Gypsy Hill will continue in to Victoria

No service between London Bridge and Beckenham Junction

Please use alternative Southern, Tramlink, London Overground and Southeastern services to complete your journey. Southern tickets will also be accepted on local buses between West Norwood and Tulse Hill and between Crystal Palace, Birkbeck and Beckenham Junction.



Timetable #33 (the West Croydon route) suggests that the same trains will run as they have done in recent months


There is no posted timetable for the Wimbledon route (at least, not that I can find). The timetable page states:

No service between Sutton and Streatham via Wimbledon (this service normally operates during the peak only)

Tickets will be accepted on Thameslink services to and from London Blackfriars which will operate to a normal Monday to Friday timetable. Change at Streatham for alternative Southern services to London Bridge.



The inference I'm making here is that we will be down to two trains per hour - those to/from West Croydon. That would be a drastic reduction in service. Their journey planner isn't going to be updated until tomorrow, so until then we're reliant upon digging the info out ourselves.


That being the case, the new commuter services into London Bridge would be as follows:

from North Dulwich: 6:53, 7:27, 8:27, 9:28

from East Dulwich: 6:55, 7:30, 8:30, 9:30

from Peckham Rye: 6:58, 7:33, 8:33, 9:34


There is also an additional service which terminates at South Bermondsey: NDW 7:57, EDW 8:02, PMR 8:09


Notice that some of those services allow extra time between NDW and EDW than they used to (up to five minutes) and between EDW and PMR (up to seven minutes)


The services back home from London Bridge would depart LBG at:

16:10, 16:40, 17:11, 18:08, 18:51.

Yes, you've read that right, basically one train an hour. The off-peak service is actually more frequent than the peak service.


Someone please tell me I'm mistaken.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have had multiple jobs completed at my home by T.D. PLUMBFIX SOLUTIONS LTD, and I wouldn't go to anyone else now. They always come at the agreed day/time, I have never been asked to rearrange. The jobs have always been completed to extremely high standards, and as a perfectionist myself, I appreciate this level of care and detail. I'm grateful of the clear up afterward too, leaving me very little to do after the job is done. I am always blown away by the speed and efficiency  - no waffle, no flannel, just sheer hard work from start to finish. In summary - a highly professional first class service. Don't hesitate to call T.D. PLUMBFIX SOLUTIONS LTD, if you like excellence and trade people that will respect your home. 
    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...