Jump to content

Recommended Posts

results so far...


Conservative 10,091,687 36.1 +3.9

Labour 8,144,932 29.2 -6.3

Liberal Dem 6,400,096 22.9 +1.0


14.5 million people (who voted for the 3 main parties... so the full figure is considerably more) DO NOT WANT a Tory government!


I am hoping for a Labour/Lib Dem coalition...


what are your views...


ps bit muzzy headed as went to bed at 3 and got up at 6 so will definitely need that gin and tonic tonight at the Gowlett

[quote name=Well with that reasoning' date=' maybe we should just hand over power to a military dictator with voters not wanting a Labour, Lib Dem or Tory government

]




no matthew123... that argument does not wash... cos they did not vote and do not exist in the UK!!!!!

http://reichcomm.typepad.com/my_weblog/images/2007/08/15/thumbs_down.jpg

jam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why does anyone want a Tory OR Labour Government? does no one believe in change?



Clearly not the sort of "change" that was being put on the table. One commentator was saying earlier that Immigration was one of the leading factors, and although lots of people liked Clegg, once they looked at the policies, they didn't like them. Guess that is a good thing in that people voted on policy rather than personality.


I am genuinely surprised how poorly the Lib Dems have done, but I think the waters were overly muddied by all this tactical voting stuff, which led to the same old "vote for one to keep the other out" type mentality. If I am honest, I was still undecided as I marked my ballot paper, and that is a first for me.


At least I new what I was doing in the locals, and I only realised yesterday that we had a mayoral vote for Lewisham too.


Congrats to Greens for first seat, and fuck off BNP, you're shite, and your leader could only come in 3rd in a seat that many thought he'd take.

Have I missed something, or has nobody yet commented that Tessa Jowell has not only retained her seat, but with a similar, maybe even increased majority. This is so out of kilter with the (clearly unrepresentative) EDF poll that put Labour in third place. I'm gobsmacked, it's as if the last four weeks never happened.

I was shocked Tessa still held to her seat. How is that possible?! And she has been in power too long that trying to communicate with her these days is impossible. Whereas James Barber was on the ball constantly and I thought the Lib Dem were going to win the seat in our borough.


I am pleased that the Green party finally got a seat. Seems pretty ironic that Green seems the common sense party to vote for, but everyone is stuck in the Tories/Labour Mode.

Well thank heavens the Blues didn't get in - a small mercy.


I don't feel so guilty over having voted Green now...indeed, well done Greens...hee hee. (Sorry Keef/Loz, I had a panic attack at the last minute :-S; but thanks ????/brum for giving me that push to vote with my heart and not get "sucked" into voting tactically).


I don't think the reds did as badly as predicted.


As for the Yellows...ha ha ha...that will teach Clegg to be so smug (bordering on cocky).


BNP? I won't even waste my breath.


I'm happy.

I was hunting them too then found this:


"Local elections

Votes cast in the local elections will be counted from 1pm on Friday 7 May 2010. Results will be published here as soon as they are available so please check back again."

http://www.southwark.gov.uk/news/article/18/elections-6_may_2010

DirtyBox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 14.5 million people (who voted for the 3 main

> parties... so the full figure is considerably

> more) DO NOT WANT a Tory government!

>

> On that reasoning 16.5 million DO NOT WANT a

> Labour government



Possibly although I think it?s safe to assume that most Lib Dem voters would prefer a Labour government to a Tory one and that a significant number of Labour voters would have rather voted Lib Dem if they felt it would have counted.


I don?t know if I can count myself amongst these though.


Personally I can?t think which I?m more unhappy with, the idea of a party owned by big money concerns such as the Rothschilds where most of the supporters vote for it out of a sense of tradition engrained by a detestable class system or the idea of a party owned by outdated and irrelevant labour unions (but nevertheless the lap dog of large financial concerns) where most of the supporters vote for it out of a sense of tradition engrained by a detestable class system.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...