Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was idly considering various small 1950's developments in the area recently when it occurred to me that many must have been built on pockets of bomb damage. I know that a bomb fell at the bottom of my garden in Marmora Road and can see a possible "line of damage" across Marmora, Mundania and Therapia roads.


I understand thatsomewhere thers is a anotated map of the bombs that fell in the ED area - can anyone advise me on its whereabouts - I haven't tried the library yet but will.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1349-bomb-damage-wwii/
Share on other sites

Apparently if you get aerial shots of south east London you can pick out long strips where missing victorian housing indicates where the bombs fell in lines. And yes, the obvious signs now are the fifties and sixties houses sitting in the middle of victorian terraces.


Charlie

The so-called Bomb Maps were available in a huge reference book: http://www.amazon.co.uk/London-County-Council-Damage-1939-45/dp/0902087517/ref=sr_1_1/203-4831955-9863918?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1188894260&sr=8-1


It's out of print now, but the originals are in the National Archives at Kew.


The V1/V2 website is excellent, with good stories, as are the various East Dulwich books at the library. Dulwich got a hammering as the govt. put out disinformation that the war cabinet had decamped to somewhere in SE21.

Great web site, thanks for that ianj.

Didn't someone on here mention the misinformation put out in codes we knew had been cracked by the germans, claiming that central london hits were actually landing in north london, prompting the germans to recalibrate their rockets and hence the ensuing pasting of lewisham, dulwich et al and particularly poor old croydon.

There was an interesting article in an old copy of SE22 magazine on bomb hits in which people died (Feb I think). Was talking about it last night as our place is on a bombsite and was on the list. I think it comes from a book on East Dulwich history which may still be available in the library on lordship lane.
ratty - depends where your Dad's house was in E1, but the Tower Hamlets Local History library on Bancroft Road has a copy of the local 'bomb map' which is very striking. I've got a (much photocopied) version I use for teaching - if you pm me your postal address, I'll send you a copy. It won't tell you when though - I think that is probably a National Archives/London Metropolitan Archives job.
Also,in 'Agent Zigzag', great book about WW2 double agent, the agent is told by his British handlers to make false reports about bomb damage in central London so that SE London would carry on getting hit, on the basis that casualities would be lighter than in Central London. In this book it is presented that the dulwich bombing was not deliberate but the result of miscalibration.

IIRC, the block on Lordship Lane with Budgens at one end and the chemists at the other is built on a bomb damaged site. I think it was a V2 that not only destroyed the original block but killed about 20 people at a tram stop, pretty grim.


Not only does this account for the modern block but that the Northcross Road shops don't start for a while and the corner of Nutfield Road has two new builds.


I presume the Palmerston must have been significantly repaired?


All of this was from a book on old East Dulwich which I sped read in the Horniman a couple of years ago (probably the same as AB references above) so apologise if the details are a bit flakey. There may have been a before and after picture of that area too.

"IIRC, the block on Lordship Lane with Budgens at one end and the chemists at the other is built on a bomb damaged site. I think it was a V2 that not only destroyed the original block but killed about 20 people at a tram stop, pretty grim."


The block referred to was the site of the Co-op, which was destroyed later in the war in August 1944, when a bomb fell in daytime and many shoppers and passers-by were killed. When I came to live in ED there was still a quite a sizable Co-op on the greater part of that block, but it closed shortly after. Almost every 40s and 50s house or the larger 40s/50s developments in the area are on the sites of bombings. The 1940s development of flats in Melbourne Grove is on the site of a very big explosion, but in most cases you can see where strings of bombs fell across numerous roads, resulting in post-war developments of 3 or 4 post-war houses or flats in roads next to each other. At that time ED was part of the then Borough of Camberwell, which had 90%+ of its total housing damaged in some way in the war.

"Hence all the concrete-tiled rooves, pebbledash and metal framed or non-standard windows in the area, especially in the shops opposite the Co-op block on LL."


Well observed, but if you sit in the (East?) Dulwich Cafe and you can get a good view of the roof the building immediately opposite (I think it's a dentist), and you will see a very good and increasingly rare example of an elaborately slated roof and an ornate brick chimney stack, which is how the whole of East Dulwich used to be.

I seem to remember that Riley's had their factory South of the railway line just West of Dulwich Hospital. Makers of horse-riding helmets, motor-cycle helmets (old-style), and industrial protection helmts. Those were the days of leather and cork.


This thread reminds me of the difficulties of claiming compensation from the War Damage Commission. Inadequate compensation and material shortages meant that damaged houses next to bomb-sites were "repaired" in a very ad hoc fashion and then the repairs were skillfully hidden. Probably in the hope that proper repairs could be done later in better times.


In the old days when East Dulwich had proper estate agents such as White Dent they had this local knowledge of which properties were affected in this way.


I suspect that now this local knowledge is lost house surveys may well not discover this damage.

  • 1 month later...

I am resurrecting this post as I am nearly through a book that details why Dulwich was hit by V-1 bombs.


Why would the Nazi's want to hit Dulwich?


Well this biography I am reading at the moment, titled 'Agent Zigzag; Lover, Traitor, Hero, Spy' by Ben Macintyre, tells of how Zigzag acted as a double agent in WW2. He worked with the German Secret Services known as Abwehr, as well as MI5's infamous Twenty Committee.


Agent Zigzag was known throughout Soho's underworld as Eddie Chapman. A racketeer and crook.


He stumbled into acting as a double agent and ended up giving disinformation to his German Spy Master, Von Groning, concerning locations and target points of the V-1's launced by the Germans.


The Luftwaffe tried to aim for Charing Cross (which is where the Admiralty is based) but they fell short, always.


With the disinformation MI5 reckoned that Zigzag could move the Doodlebugs further away from the centre of London into suburban and 'countryside' areas. This is one of the main reasons Dulwich was hit. To quote:


'The Germans seemed to be aiming for the Charing Cross area, but the mean point of impact was calculated to be Dulwich station in south London'


Another quote:


'Chapman's deception messages have survived only in fragments. MI5 was careful to destroy the traffic, aware of the potential repercussions if the inhabitants of south London realised they were being sacrificed to protect the centre of the City.'


This book is fascinating and for anyone who is interested in the history and complexity of WW2, I suggest reading it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I would like to understand this promise by the Greens in greater detail and how it applies locally? Presumably road/pavement upkeep and renewal is as important for cyclists and pedestrians as motorists? I am not aware of plans to build new roads locally but there has been plenty of money spent on converting roads into pedestrian only areas. On the face of it this feels a slightly empty statement, when applied at local level. I'd love to know the Greens stance in hiring out parks for private use (given impact on park environment), I'd also like to understand their stance on fireworks- I will look to see if I can find anything. I don't know if a manifesto exists under the documents section of Southwark Greens, but you can only access that bit by signing in- which is disappointing. If anyone has a manifesto that reflects local priorities- could they post a link?
    • You are most likely correct in thinking that  Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew it.  But they obviously thought that his skills, abilities and usefulness far outweighed the negatives. Here is a summary of the positives lifted from elsewhere:-   1. Strategic Architect: He was a primary architect of "New Labour," rebranding the party and shifting its core ideology to win the 1997 general election. 2 Master of Communication: Often called the original "spin doctor," he revolutionised how political parties manage the media. He famously created the "grid" system to coordinate government messaging. 3 Networking and Charm: Known as "Silvertongue," he possesses a peerless ability to charm and network with high-level global figures, including business leaders and heads of state. 4. Governance and Trade Expertise: Beyond strategy, he was considered a highly efficient minister, serving as European Commissioner for Trade and Secretary of State across multiple departments, including Business and Northern Ireland.  5. Reinvention: His capacity to adapt to changing political climates and rebuild relationships reflects personal resilience and strategic flexibility. With his skill and abilities, he delivered results for all his bosses. In the short time in Washington, he found a way to get on the right side of Trump - despite him  being critical of Trump in previous years. That said he is complex personality.  He can be simultaneously brilliant and arrogant, thick-skinned yet sensitive, and selfless for his party while appearing narcissistic in his personal dealings.  My OP asked if he would be accepted over the pond. It turned out he was because he got on famously with trump. He worked out the correct strategy to get on the good side of Trump and secured a better trade deal than the EU and other nations.    
    • Malumbu, do you happen to know what the current figure is for "trips into town made by walking, cycling and public transport"? 
    • Before voting, do you not think it's logical to evaluate each party on its policies and make a tally of the reasons "For" and "Against" voting for each party.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...