Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The ongoing emptiness does bother me - I can only assume a favourable lease negotiated long ago, unsustainable when it's up for renewal


I've never had a bad time there but the food is, well it's not great and prone to being ridiculously salty. It has served well but if I was the owners and wanted to stay there I would shorten the menu, get some good mexican dishes on there and try and attract more punters

James is right... it's a bit grimy, and the food is somewhat "retro". It is also usually empty, so would not go with a small group.


However, if you don't mind the above, and you have enough people to provide your own atmosphere, it's worth a go. Food is inexpensive, beers are cheap, and the cocktails certainly look "interesting". Service is friendly enough.

I was put off visting this eating place for ages when I first moved to ED a few years back, due to the tacky exterior. However, I have to say I love it, good food, reasonable prices and the decor makes for a lighthearted evening. I'd recommend trying it if you haven't been before, you'll be pleasantly surprised.


Jen x

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The ongoing emptiness does bother me - I can only

> assume a favourable lease negotiated long ago,

> unsustainable when it's up for renewal

>

> I've never had a bad time there but the food is,

> well it's not great and prone to being

> ridiculously salty. It has served well but if I

> was the owners and wanted to stay there I would

> shorten the menu, get some good mexican dishes on

> there and try and attract more punters



in other words send in gordon

Cheap, cheerful and cheesy >:D< which are all plusses in my books but I think they could benefit from a bit of a menu revamp and a spruce-up.


I am not for a minute suggesting they become some purveyor of poncy, ?authentic Mexican cuisine? for those who can tell the origin of a re-fried bean by its smell and consistency and will only touch a nacho that has been prepared with the Guatemalan clay-ground method. (As such people should be locked in lead boxes and shot into the sun to prevent their self-awareness from turning the space-time continuum into any more of a slurry pit than it already is.)


Just a window clean, carpet shampoo and some fresher ingredients.


Other than that. Cocktails, beer and burritos. What?s not to like?

I love the place, it's tacky, it's old school, it's fun, it's cheap, the food is okay - not special, but not horrible, and lines the stomach. The drinks are great :)-D


I always read things on here saying how empty it is, but whenever I've been in there it's been at least half full.


Opinions are divided, so just give it a try and decide for yourself, even if you don't like it, it won't have set you back too much.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not a place I've ever actually ventured into but

> I'm told that the Margaritas are worth the visit

> alone.


What I reckon:


Yes, the food certainly isn't Mexican food like I have had (and that wasn't 100% as I was in southern California), but it's not a terrible effort given the ingredients available to them.


The Margaritas ARE EXCELLENT! Although I think I may have had to ask to keep the ice in mine, can't remember...


Service was good when I went.


Overall it's a bit of fun, and even more fun if you like margaritas as much as I do. Oh, and I love the decor, and how they spell it 'Passo' out front.

spadetownboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> best mexican on lordship lane, i like it others

> dont, nice food good drink, but only thing is to

> go along and make your own mind up, and if you

> dont like it you can always get the 176 home;-)


Only Mexican on LL isn't it? Ha ha. I've been to Mexico (several years ago now) and the food there was crap all over, nothing like the 'Tex-Mex' vibe in restaurants here. I lived on Avocadoes (which were fantastic) in Mexico and don't think I saw a refried bean the whole time. Anyway I digress, never been to El Paso but I'm interested in the claim that it does great Margheritas. Can anyone second that?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac)
    • Unless they were wearing school uniform with name tags otherwise children do change their clothes you know. 
    • I'd also recommend Silvano for anyone in the area looking to learn automatic, having just passed first time with 5 minors. He's a very patient teacher and ensured I learned how to drive safely above all. 
    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.       Sorry, cross-post. I was replying to Malumbu. Give me a minute, if you will. I listened to the first two sessions (today) on TMS and popped down to the pub for the evening one.   I do miss the days of Peter West, Richie Benaud and Tom Graveney on BBC2.   But, the BBC are at least putting on 'Today At The Test' on at around 7pm instead of after midnight.   And it was on the 10pm news.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...