Jump to content

Recommended Posts

lozzyloz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Alan Dale - Christopher Biggins

>


People have actually said I look like him - only I have less hair.


I have also been called The Great Suprendo (Geoffrey Durham).


All the fat, camp, speccy, flowery guys..


Even Russell Grant once. And Larry Grayson.


I think I must be living proof that you can have smoke without fire although you might argue that I'm just surpressing my natural tendencies and that my babymother is just an elaborate disguise... A beard. A walker..

CHAV, it wasn't me that said Kathy Burke (although I love her). This started on a different thread, so I just moved it over here.I'd actually put you as a cross between Billy Bragg, Liam Gallagher and Geri Halliwell ;-)


Ant, it's the boyish good looks and general nice guyishness :))

"CHAV, it wasn't me that said Kathy Burke (although I love her). This started on a different thread, so I just moved it over here.I'd actually put you as a cross between Billy Bragg, Liam Gallagher and Geri Halliwell " -


Haha that's better!


Actually Kathy Burke is a great actress, but please tell me I look better than she does!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • 18 isn't a magical age for growth, I'm guessing that it is at least size related. Some bodies will be more 'mature' at 16 than others. 
    • Looking for around half a dozen concrete pavers ( the tinner ones) should measure 44c44cmx by 32mm thick
    • I would imagine that the evidence shows that protein powder is not suitable for under 18s whatever the brand.  Staff should’ve known that.
    • I'm not sure it's sensible  to presume any agreement from interlocutors, but if you do, then I do agree that it's the right thing to say so. My own guess -- it's nothing more -- is that the officers were acting just to effect an arrest on arrival, as requested, quite possibly without any knowledge of the content of wretched tweet at all*, and that their being armed was absolutely incidental.  But I don't know any reliable facts. I do think the turning up (5?) en masse to do so was possibly complacent and unthinking, if there was no reason to believe the arrestee was a threat.  If they had  been doing so for good reason, I guess they could have had at least one weapon trained at him, and had  him hands above head or on the ground in no time.  But I know no reliable facts of the incident whatsoever.  Perhaps they were Father Ted fans -- seriously -- and trogged along, on a quiet afternoon, to see the man himself.  Perhaps they and/or their CO will get a severe bollocking from above.  I don't know. * But even that with some reservations.  The last time I looked up cases on wrongful arrest, years ago, I think I remember there being held then to be at least some onus on the acting arresting officer to be satisfied that  the required grounds for a lawful arrest  did exist.  And I don't know any of the facts of the present case. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...