Jump to content

Restaurants - hygiene stars


Recommended Posts

Not sure if anyone has posted about this before, but on the Scores on the doors site you can search for local restaurants and find out how they did in their last hygiene inspection. There are 5 possible stars, with 5 being the best and 1 (or 0!) being the worst. I've just wasted loads of time searching.... Le Chandelier and Tandoori Nights both only get 1 star......
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a positive note McDonalds gets 5 Stars as does KFC, Pizza Express and all the other chains.


Still you can also rest assured that an excellent 4 out of 5 on Lordship Lane and close by goes to:


Thai Corner Cafe

Sea Cow

Black Cherry

Kebab & Wine

Le Chardon

Springers Wine Bar

Blue Mountain

Anatolia

Domino's Pizza

Bubble & Squeak Cafe

The Lane Cafe

Pavilion Cafe Dulwich Park

Cafe Rouge

Mr Lui

Pizza Pan

Franklins

Curry Cabin

Cafe Nero

Dulwich Picture Gallery

The Plough Cafe

Starbucks

Cafe el Passo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tandoori Nights....oh no, say it is not so. I finally got to eat there last week, first time in years, and loved it. Best Indian on Lordship, whatever I've said in the past. Interesting that the Curry Cabin is the only Indian in that four star list (if it's complete).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So now we are presented with these figures, what are we supposed to do with them? William Rose scores lower than Iceland, but looking at the scoring system this might simply be because WR deals with riskier food, i.e. fresh meat, versus processed frozen. Bellamy's newsagent gets 5 stars, maybe I should buy my meat there. Note also that many of the reports are over a year old.


Take this whole thing with a pinch of salt (but try to keep the salt to less than 6g per day or the diet police will be on to you.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reading through this thread I've tried really hard to find some part of me that might care about food hygiene stars, but I just can't.


Perhaps I'll get a horirble case of food poisoning, perhaps I deserve to, but I can't imagine ever looking up the hygiene rating of a restaurant I like or changing my behaviour because of it.


Just me?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

macroban Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Iceland sells fresh meat.


True. All their fresh food and their veg is sealed in plastic. I'm sure that's more hygienic. What happens to it when it's being processed before it gets to Iceland I've no idea. All round which fresh meat do I have more faith in? William Rose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is an excellent scheme. It is most important to check the hygiene standards of any restaurant you eat at. By publishing this information, perhaps we can try and cut down on some of the terribly lax standards prevalent in so many eateries.


I have a friend who works in a fairly well-known restaurant in Soho. She tells me that on one occasion, a rat ran across a shelf and fell into a cooking pot! The head chef ordered someone to fish it out with a sieve and then the food in that pot was served to customers anyway! Apparently the chef said the heat would kill the germs!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we should care - the sad thing is that so many managers of catering businesses don't care about food hygiene or their customers' health. Remember that some people eating in cafes and restaurants could be very seriously affected by food poisoning - children, the elderly etc. Yes, some of the reports may be quite old and things could have improved, but if the business wasn't that bothered about food hygiene at the last inspection......
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The main difference between 4 and 5 star premises is that the 5 star ones have all had an independent hygiene audit of their premises. This does not make them any cleaner than the 4 star premises and as can be seen from the lists above, it is something that is much more cost effective for multinationals than small independents.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

and yet when people go travelling in the east, most of the "genuine" food raved about is the authentic stuff served up by locals, on a manky old one ring gaz, with the local vermin watching on... or is that just me?


Sterile environments scare me - it must erode at our ability to fight germs - a bit of rough is fine by me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Students of food hygiene and karma will be interested to know that, since my last post, I have had a high fever, been unable to stand for more than five minutes and nothing solid has gone in or out of me.


I haven't checked the hygiene stars of the takeaway pizza place I used on Wednesday.


Still, silver lining, it's shifted the last stubborn 5lbs that I've been wanting to lose for ages!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I tried to engage one Dulwich by email.  They sent me a lot of flannel but were not prepared to discuss things.  I clearly will not be joining.  I support groups  that campaign to improve the environment, our health and well being etc not single issue groups who want to maintain the status quo.  
    • You have to spend time in the area, only you know what feels right for you. You will then probably have more specific questions to ask which will be easier to answer.
    • I've known of this forum for a while, and given its very active and obviously contains a lot of locals I thought this would be a good place to ask... I have a dilemma and I could find some old thread from '14, but obviously in a decade much has changed with all of these areas (maybe the village less so) - so some background I'll supply, and I'd love to know what folks think on the area that will suit best based on below situation and wants/needs Us Mid/late 30's have lived nearer to Clapham/Brixton for many years - current house large enough but small garden, and Brixton area not great for kids plus long school commute A young kid starting school in the not too distant future (school slap bang in the middle of all the Dulwich's (not state, so without naming it, you get the idea of location) Work remote mostly around St Pauls a few days (both parents) so half decent links to that area of London good  Requirements Access out of London to the SW/W required occasionally by car, don't know anyone further East/South really Want a larger garden for kid/us - ideally semi detached house at the least and nothing smaller than what we have (which rules out most of ED apart from Upland/Friern type houses) Things locally to do with kids (soft play/fun park/cinema etc) and also a few handy shops (Rosendale Road/Park Hall Road would likely cover most little things) Nice and relatively safe neighbourhood feel - currently most of our street are 20 something sharers who aren't able to work out how the wheeliebins work/Brixton nutters roam about here Not too loud, there is a lot of noise where we are now, and its not what I want next time - so away from main road/bus route ideally. Ideally a walk to school or very short car/bike/scooter ride weather permitting it is one of the well known Dulwich schools  My take on things - please correct me/add to this, as I am not a local! Budget is up to around £2m, and in ED to get the same size house (circa 1800 sqft 4/5 bed) I'd probably end up quite a way from things, either on Upland/Friern or the bottom of Peck Rye for example I've seen some houses, seems a bit remote - most of the houses with good access to Lordship are quite small. Houses in the Village are either too expensive or are going to be the same as what I have now albeit with a better garden, but decent neighbourhood feel/access to park/local shops and things etc I feel is peak here of all areas - its nice and quiet - transport is a bit pants mind you Houses in WD seem to be larger in size, have nice sized gardens, depending how close I can get to WD station, the school is very close, there are 3 stations that would work well, and there is a small selection of local shops, feels OK neighbourhood wise? Nearer Norwood end I worry of all the things I dislike about being near Brixton, but maybe that is unfounded.   On balance I think trying to buy something around Rosendale road shops in either direction a couple hundred meters is likely going to offer the best house, best transport options, and meet my criteria with quieter life and being best for the school. But it isn't close to any of the parks really, and is it a bit dull if I get sick of The Rosendale? Dulwich Village I suspect is the best all round option but transport isn't great and obviously its the most expensive, and the LTN on Court Lane makes living in the roads there (which is likely all I could afford) and trying to get out SW a pain as you have to go all the way around. I like Lordship lane the most as a place for 'stuff' (although not sure these days if its that child compatible with loads of young people?), but house wise I'd likely end up too far from anything interesting as anything within a short walk of LL is pretty small and they don't have decent sized gardens. Any opinions welcome and encouraged as short of spending bloody ages online I only know what I know from my handful of visits to either location over the years.
    • You might possibly consider that the the degree of scepticism and suspicion your original post encountered was largely due to the accusatory nature of the title in which you specifically identified a long-standing and respected local business. You also sensationalised the matter by using the words "poisoning" and  "twice!" in the heading.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...