Jump to content

Recommended Posts

woodie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> theres a renowned eel and pie in peckham high

> street no? olde looking place.

> not a fan so dont know if its "the best" or not.


It's shut down.... the whole family business shut down despite some serious offers of help - I think it was a generation thing.


I'd rather like a really good Caribbean place - like The Mango Rooms in Camden.

Now I'm not suggesting this particular chain


http://www.goodlifediner.com/


But a diner type thing like that - good british caffs are great but not the same thing


Smewhere to pop in for breakfast, or a a bowl of chili and a beer, but in fairly open relaxed space - ie the opposite of GBK and it's elbows together noise-fest

That's the sort of thing loz


I was thinking the space where Woolwich used to be would be perfect


reason I thought of it was because I was in Camden last night (Scott Capurro's Edinburgh show - and peple thought he was near the knuckle @ EDT??? pheweee) and went to the diner place and it was just the perfect spot for an hour stop off and a chat. Their chili scores points for using non-minced beef as well btw

La Locandera? I think it was called


Where G&B is now and where Redgewells was?


Best draw the curtain over that mis-fire. I only ever saw 2 people eat in there so I'd be surprised if many people can post belated reviews. I didn't know the sisters (I think they were anyway) who tried with the restaurant but I felt pretty bad for them every time I passed

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Now I'm not suggesting this particular chain

>

> http://www.goodlifediner.com/

>

> But a diner type thing like that - good british

> caffs are great but not the same thing

>

> Somewhere to pop in for breakfast, or a a bowl of

> chili and a beer, but in fairly open relaxed space

> - ie the opposite of GBK and it's elbows together

> noise-fest



Looks like a Wimpy Bar to me.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> La Locandera? I think it was called

>

> Where G&B is now and where Redgewells was?

>

> Best draw the curtain over that mis-fire. I only

> ever saw 2 people eat in there so I'd be surprised

> if many people can post belated reviews. I didn't

> know the sisters (I think they were anyway) who

> tried with the restaurant but I felt pretty bad

> for them every time I passed


I ate there once, just after it stopped being Redgewells (loved Redgewells, as I've said before I'm sure)and the food was wonderful, but we were the only people in there. I don't know why it didn't take off, I liked it (not as much as I liked Redgewells of course. Have I mentioned that I loved Redgewells?)

annaj Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> I ate there once, just after it stopped being

> Redgewells (loved Redgewells, as I've said before

> I'm sure)and the food was wonderful, but we were

> the only people in there. I don't know why it

> didn't take off, I liked it


xxxxxxxx


It probably didn't take off because it didn't look like a great place to eat - which was why I never ventured in ...... :-S

I like the Sea Cow although the last time myself and the boyfriend went in there, the fish kinda tasted like bleach and we both had the squits for about a week after.... I haven't been in there since, but before then, we had some lovely fish n chips, maybe they are just overly enthusiastic about cleaning, which is a good thing really...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...