Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So,s he,s been aquitted and thats the law of the land, but I still can,t make my mind up on this one, espicially following on from todays comments that he couldn,t have shot Ms Dando, as he was stalking another woman at that time. I know a lot has been made of his low intellect but it just makes one wonder that he,s doing himself no favours in trying to alleviate any lingering suspicion by comments such as these. Any views?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3910-barry-george/
Share on other sites

Seems a perfectly reasonable alibi.Surely no self-respecting Stalker can do a Professional job on 2 people at the same time..and as he was busy stalking a "person unknown" that would exonerate him as far as I'm concerned.

In fact he could approach the person who he is really stalking and ask them if they would not mind terribly veryifying his story.Sure they won't mind.

Case Dismissed! Next!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3910-barry-george/#findComment-122867
Share on other sites

I can't believe he did it, not proven is as good as guilty, it assumes you have committed the crime but there is not enough evidence against you for a conviction. Mind you all Scots are guilty in my opinion.


I think this is another case of the Police taking the easy way out. A clearly very inadequate individual with little ability to challenge them and their authority. Look at all the other cases, Birmingham six, that poor woman accused of killing her babies, when they were cot deaths and subsequently killed herself after she was freed. Christ, if we still had the death penalty, what then?


All you read about it points to a professional killing, the question is why, and of course who. There are loads of rumours, but unless the Police actually investigate the crime properly we?ll never know.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3910-barry-george/#findComment-122873
Share on other sites

What do peopel think about Scotland Yard's head of homicide statement:


"Commander Simon Foy, head of Scotland Yard's homicide and serious crime command, said: "We are disappointed by today's verdict but especially disappointed for Jill's family and friends. However, we respect the decision of the court." "


Sounded a bit defensive and inappropriate to me. Why didn't he just say "Barry George is still guilty in my eyes. Bloody do-gooders. It's political correctness gone MAD I tell thee!"

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3910-barry-george/#findComment-122874
Share on other sites

I agree with you Oldie, I don't think he did it either given the information about him. He was an easy target.

Professional hit from the way it was done. Maybe something to do with Crimewatch although why? Also I read she had received critical letters regarding her support for the Kosovans at the time but again, why bother with her?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3910-barry-george/#findComment-122877
Share on other sites

His convition always seemed iffy. This was a ruthless and seemingly planned execution style murder which took place in daylight. Given George's health and alleged general inability to organise his life it never seemed likely he would have the nous to pull it off.

A weird bloke and a nuisance, certainly but a killer, I don't think so.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3910-barry-george/#findComment-122881
Share on other sites

I agree with tony.suburbs the alibi of "it couldnt of been me gov, i was stalking someone else at the time" hardly makes me want to have this bloke back in society although take on board that this individual is rather complex etc etc... how do people feel about his compensation claim? i accept the man has lost 8 years of his life and there has been a miscarriage of justice but possibly half million? i read somewhere that the formula takes into account loss of earnings and emotional distress etc... i'd like to know what he did for a living....
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3910-barry-george/#findComment-123015
Share on other sites

Dunno what he did for a living but if I had done 8 years inside for murder that I did not do I would want a darn site more than ?500k. Have you ever been inside a prison? Dunno which one he was in but I have been in Pentonville and the Scrubs (professionally, not as an inmate) and they are fooking horrible places!


I always thought it a little too convenient that they arrested the local weirdo for this one. I guess we will never know the truth though.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3910-barry-george/#findComment-123036
Share on other sites

lordship_bod Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I agree with tony.suburbs the alibi of "it couldnt

> of been me gov, i was stalking someone else at the

> time" hardly makes me want to have this bloke back

> in society although take on board that this

> individual is rather complex etc etc... how do

> people feel about his compensation claim? i accept

> the man has lost 8 years of his life and there has

> been a miscarriage of justice but possibly half

> million? i read somewhere that the formula takes

> into account loss of earnings and emotional

> distress etc... i'd like to know what he did for a

> living....



how much would it take for you to spend the next 8 years in prison?


i wouldn't do it for half a million

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3910-barry-george/#findComment-123039
Share on other sites

There was also ?250,000 being talked about. The final figure may well be in between the two. Or it may not. Speculating about it at this stage seems pointless. Doing 8 years inside for a crime you've not done must be unimaginable.

Regardless of what he might have earned in the time, he deserves compensation for what he went through.

Still he's obviously started to seek charitable donations from the News Of The World and Sky TV.

Good to see Rupert Murdoch doing his bit.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3910-barry-george/#findComment-123052
Share on other sites

In the trade it is called, being framed, fitted up, put any sap in to release us to nick motorists and cigar butt droppers.

I remember having a conversation about this case when they stated they had found 'a loner' and Barry George fell into the hands of the police and from that moment he was gonna be 'it'.

Conveniently forgetting that one third of the population live alone, and are 'loners'.


He was a simple mark who had no help from any source except his solicitor, but he is not mentioned, why(?)

Is this another case where the solicitor and/or court is unfit for purpose(?)


British justice in this case, and most of the cases that Charles Dickens wrote about

from Pickwick Papers to Bleak House, just stinks.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3910-barry-george/#findComment-123115
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
    • There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda and far more across their briefs than any minister I've seen in years. The consensus was that Labour are so unpopular and untrusted by the electorate already, as are the Conservatives, that breaking the manifesto pledge on income tax wouldn't drive their approval ratings any lower, so they should, and I quote, 'Roll The Dice', hope for the best and see where we are in a couple of years time. As a strategy, i don't know whether I find that quite worrying or just an honest appraisal of what most governments actually do in practice.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...