Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> People (and I'm really not looking at you moos)

> correcting other people's spelling or grammar. In

> an essay or work email, okay. On here or the like,

> no no no, please don't! It's smug at best, and

> frankly cruel IMO.


I couldn't agree more. One of the girls on another forum I post on is forever getting ribbed by some people about her spelling and grammar and it's totally unnecessary. Everyone knows what she means. It's not witty or clever it's just patronizing.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It must have been said already, but after this

> morning...

>

> Feckin kids playing mobile phone music on the

> bus!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :X



Too right. This just really annoys me. It ruins my journey and i get so angry. If the kid issmaller than me I'll say something like "why don't you have headphones?" or "why do you think the whole carriage wants to listen to your music". If i put on a stern enough face they normally turn it off or get out their headphones (!!).


If the kid is bigger than me (not hard at my amazing height of 5 ft 2) i'll normally move carriages but get really annoyed that I have to move because some little sh** thinks he has the right to sit there listening to his music really loudly and that everyone else on the carriage should hear it too.

indiepanda Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Keef Wrote:

> It's smug at best, and frankly cruel IMO.

>

> I couldn't agree more. ... It's not witty or clever it's just

> patronizing.


Absolutement!

Maybe someone should inform one or two Members of the self-appointed cognescenti on here.

If it keeps them happy who are we.with bigger fish to fry,to complain...:))

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Carnell's post made both me and lady mac laugh out

> loud on the 176. . . Which deserves a prize of its

> own



Made me laugh too, but in the interests of balance, Tony's reply made me snigger as well.

What I internally label Threads of doom, where all therein seem destined to repeat themselves to an uncomprehending world until the power runs out. There's a particularly apposite example rumbling on at the moment.


Bloody spot on! I am not above being drawn in to such threads, but you are so spot on!

missd Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Keef Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It must have been said already, but after this

> > morning...

> >

> > Feckin kids playing mobile phone music on the

> > bus!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :X

>

>

> Too right. This just really annoys me. It ruins my

> journey and i get so angry. If the kid issmaller

> than me I'll say something like "why don't you

> have headphones?" or "why do you think the whole

> carriage wants to listen to your music". If i put

> on a stern enough face they normally turn it off

> or get out their headphones (!!).

>

> If the kid is bigger than me (not hard at my

> amazing height of 5 ft 2) i'll normally move

> carriages but get really annoyed that I have to

> move because some little sh** thinks he has the

> right to sit there listening to his music really

> loudly and that everyone else on the carriage

> should hear it too.



This is one of my pet hates too but what really irritates is the few times I have turned and asked the (normally) lads to turn it down I've had other passengers look at me as if I'm barmy for saying anything and no one backing me up, even if I get an earful back - if someone else said something I'd hope I'd back them up... no wonder the kids keep doing it.

I normally ask the annoying little brats if they have headphones and politely ask if they would use them please because I'm trying to read my book, thanks. If they refuse then I'll ask them if the offending phone is insured. If it is, throw it out the window. If not, just give cuff fecker around the ear, and threaten to shove the phone up his arse. Usually works for me.

Now this is petty - schoolchildren (OK, one particular school boy)on the bus who stand in the bus exit area and don't get out of the way with sufficient alacrity when we reach the stop. Extra annoying points as there are seats available within three paces.


Get. Out. Of. The. Way. I have a split second of my life to save here.

SimonM Wrote:btw: Who was tied to a rock and tortured by a

vulture in Greek Mythology? Its for the ?125,000 Millionaire question and I

have no idea?..Any idea M8

> Nobody. It was an eagle not a vulture. Prometheus

> had his liver eaten whilst so tied, and then it

> conveniently regenerated overnight so the bastard

> bird could feast again and again.

>

> SimonM (arrogant, supercilious grammar

> school-educated pedant....>:D<)


It was an EAGLE?? No wonder I didn't get it!::o

p.s.Greek Mythology wasn't too high on the agenda at my Grammar School.:)

There's a difference between getting annoyed with lazy misuse of language and actually diving in to correct other people's posts. (S'allright Keef, I didn't think you were having a pop)


I don't generally go in for the latter, although I have occasionally made jokes when other people's slips of the keyboard make funny reading, and I think (or hope) that it will make the poster smile rather than feel got at. I don't think I'd mind if someone did that to me, although I guess it's all in the context.


Another petty annoyance - spitting in the street. When did that become OK?

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Another petty annoyance - spitting in the street.

> When did that become OK?


Spitting in the street is of course appalling, but the Teddy Boy nose clear, whereby said Ted blocks one nostril and discharges a stream of mucus into the gutter is a thing of matchless wonder and skill.

After a completely dire weekend at work, of the sort that makes even a natural optimist start to doubt human nature, I made the mistake of venturing outside today and went to the supermarket.

My petty annoyances are....


The man carrying a baby in a sling (so its face was right under his chin) and smoking...


The man in Sainsburys who took a flapjack out a box on the shelf and ate it without buying the box...


The man at the checkout who ate his way through an entire bag of kettle chips and drank half a bottle of juice from his trolley, whilst flicking through a magazine off the shelf, in the five minutes he was queueing. FFS it's five minutes. Can you not just wait? Are you really going to starve? Are you really that busy and important?


And finally, the woman on the really busy 185 carrying nothing more than a handbag, but with her papers spread out on the luggage shelf, you know, so it's easier to read, who completely ignored me and didn't move and inch when I got on with three enourmous (reusable, don't panic) shopping bags.


And SeanMacGabhann, if you so much as whisper that it serves me right for going to Sainsburys, I'll.... well I don't know what, but just don't.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...