Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I came in this morning to find the following memo


Staff absence due to adverse weather conditions / travel difficulties


Managers are reminded that those employees who are unable to attend work will be required to take annual leave or flexi leave. The only exceptions are disabled employees who may be granted up to 2 days special leave or where an employee is a primary carer of a child where the school has closed can be granted up to 2 days compassionate leave. Employees who attended work but have received approval for late arrivals/early departures should be recorded as a standard day without loss of pay or recording leave.


In my opinion, completely out of order for Monday, when there simply was no way to make it in! I shall be playing the disabled staff card (may as well get some good out of it), but think it is so bad for those who couldn't get in, just because they didn't happen to have a kid or a disability.


So, what do others think, has your work place been generous or tight?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5169-leave-for-the-bad-weather/
Share on other sites

This is bang out of order Keef. There was just no way to get anywhere from ED on Monday. Having said that, personally, if my employer asked me to work some extra hours to make up for Monday then I would do it. That's just give and take. But there's no way I would give up a day's holiday!

My office sent an email at 6.30 on Monday morning to Blackberries telling managers to get in touch with their staff and tell them not to struggle in against all odds and do what they could from home - luckily it's performance review time so everyone could claim to be considering their past performance and setting next year's goals for some of the time.


A similar mail went out yesterday also allowing people to go early if needed. Everyone is back today though and most are working through lunch etc to make up work etc


It is give and take - companies which act like jobsworths in every instance tend not to have the loyalty or morale of those which treat their employees like adults.

My firm has been great. Some people literally battled their way in through the blizzarding snow - one walked 7 miles, starting at 7 am. Most made an effort, even if it was eventually thwarted. A car pool was set up and (cheap) rooms were booked for staff who finished late or started early. I was allowed a taxi back home (which I shared with the snow-battling colleague). The bosses were appreciative, thanking us for our efforts.

As you say GG, making up some hours is fair, and to be fair to my employers, they do offer the option of flexi-leave, but it just seems so tight of them, when it was just impossible to get in to the office.


Thing that annoys me is that I would have actually called in sick (genuinely this time, not a sicky), and was off sick yesterday, but didn't on Monday because it didn't seem worth it at the time.


Not to worry, for once my dodgy eyes can do me a favour, and I shall claim my "special" leave... (does calling it "specis" seem to be taking the p!ss out of the disabled a bit?) ;-)

I was off on Monday anyway so I'm a bit gutted I didn't get an extra day off because of the adverse weather and travel conditions like everyone else. I think your firm is bang out of order. I'd have found it nigh on impossible to have got in if I'd been due in.
No, she works with me. I've assigned to a demo team and she's smashing up concrete fast than the excavator. You should see the determination on her face, especially when she heard most of the lads have bunked off to build snowmen.......muttered something about the economy. 'TEAS UP LOUISA,.........O.K carry on'.

Just spoke to Mrs Keef, and her place of work are talking about doing the same... She will be especially annoyed as they are not paying for her maternity leave, so this will effectively be taking a day of that away from her.


Grrr!!!


Makes me feel pleased that over that last 6 years I've probably pinched a good 2 years worth of hours off of my employers!

I think it's dead tight of the employers to do anything like this


And I think people not in essential jobs were basically right to take Monday off


BUT


we may be getting some insight into why councils have a bad name viz: efficiency


My global corporation were no better tho - a staff that would make a skeleton look well-fed turned up. Even on the Tuesday


On a related note, if anyone living in Dulwich (say north of the Harvester) works in the city, most of the west end or Docklands, saying it's IMPOSSIBLE to get to work... well that isn't really true is it? A pain in the arse, a hefty walk, yes.. impossible? nah

Sean - I think a 1 1/2 hour walk each way (3 hours) is pretty much impossible. Its perhaps a sign of the current job uncertainty that so many people actually considered this.


Fortunatly my employer also sent an email to blackberrys early Monday saying no need to "take risks to come in, to work from home (or play with the kids in the snow)" which I thought was understanding although very unusual for them.

really? 90 minutes each way impossible? that sounds a bit soft to me. and it's 90 minutes in the snow.. it's still only 4 miles or so. People walk a lot more than that every day just to get some water in some parts of the wold



sorry.. am I sounding like Louisa? It's just there is a difference between saying "it's snowing so much the traffic has stopped and we are better off messing around for the day" and saying "there is no way in the world I could walk 4 miles in 6 inches of snow"

Couldn't agree more Sean, and not just because MickMac has labelled be a "dogooder" elsewhere.


If people were happy to have the excuse to take a day off from a desk job, or couldn't get childcare for children with no school or nursery, fair enough. But claiming it's "impossible" to walk 4 miles, unless you have mobility problems, is nonsense.

On Sunday night / Monday morning my dad and a few of my friends, having failed to secure post Sup*rB*wl taxis, walked back to Addiscombe, South Croydon and Earlsfield*.


They'd had a fair few and did liberate a small bottle of Jack Daniels from my drinks cabinet for the journey but nonetheless, they made it back home within 3 hours, up hill and down dale, in the snow.


They did it for the economy.


*Haven't heard back from this guy since but as his wife hasn't come calling I assume he made it back in one piece.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...