Jump to content

Recommended Posts

totally fascinating to put some names to faces last night

some people are just like there forum personalities

and some seem to have constructed an alter ego for the fun of it


who are you online

1. nemesis?

2. alter ego

3. true self?

4. or a little bit naughtier self? (that's me!)

I'm definitely me and think i come across in my usual garbled manner but not as my forum name describes. Oddly I wasn't aware that chuff was a word for lady bits and now every time I post, I have a picture of myself as a sort of burger with legs in my head.


Hope nobody else thinks same.


Chuff

Strawbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am definitely me.. cant stand it when peeps take

> on a more brave or aggressive persona just because

> they are behind a screen..


Hope I did not give the wrong impression(!)

even though I said I was a 4. I do naturally have a bit of a minx-ish streak, was always getting into trouble at school for making people laugh in class and I guess that trait has never really gone away, so probably just me online and in person

4. is 3. as (in me) they are one!

I'm me, only uncensored by embarassment -


those rants that I wouldn't necessarily unload in person I feel I can let-fly on here. Or at least that was forum-me. Oddly, now I've got to know people in person, I don't have that comfortable anonimity anymore, so I'm starting to feel like censoring myself again.

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think I'm me and wouldn't say anything on the

> Forum that I wouldn't also say face to face.


well that's cool Moos, cos your posts are often funny and clever, a great combo:)

actually ???? I think that someone was me... but horrors, in hindsight think I had muddled your online persona with someone else's....(not now going to put my foot in any further and name names here!!!) think I mentioned "rough-tough and like satan incarnate" in what was meant to be a jokey way.


How totally totally daft and rude on my first EDF drinks!! foot in first, typical me!!! was not meant in anyway to be a bleedin' insult to the online you, though thinking back (ops ops ops and ops) I can see that you might have taken it that way, hope I am forgiven:-$

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Can we change the title of this thread please.  Every time I see it I think the pool has been closed again. 😆😆
    • Still a large patch of grit clearly visible in the middle of the pool yesterday (Tuesday).  On the plus side - the water was a lot warmer!
    • Thanks for the response and to some who PM’d me. I’m now included on the Patient Participation Group (meeting next in Dec) so I’m going to feed back the comments here, good and bad. Update today to PPG members is that, as some of you have said, there is a new contact in place with GP practices with effect from 1 Oct. That appears to be the driver for some of the changes we’ve seen at The Gardens. From the responses here, though, patients might be getting an inconsistent message from the Surgery; I was definitely told that appointments must be made through the app, and only the app. It was only when I expressed concern that a strictly online service would not be suitable for all, that I was told by the receptionist that she could complete the request for me (or others if needed). Even then, then patients would need to await a text from the Practice. Perhaps we are just teething problems with the new provision…Happy to bring any and all comments to the PPG meeting (although I’m aware that the most digitally-excluded people probably aren’t on EDF!) Thanks folks.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...